This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Britney Spears, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Britney Spears on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Britney SpearsWikipedia:WikiProject Britney SpearsTemplate:WikiProject Britney SpearsBritney Spears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Should we be using low-quality sources such as BuzzFeed, RadarOnline, The Blast, TMZ, and Us Weekly for a topic that's this contentious? KyleJoantalk 04:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
No. We should be using high-quality sources, as that is the standard on Wikipedia. Shoestringnomad (talk) 20:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
No, the sources should come from credible and reliable authority. The news sources cited (e.g., BuzzFeed, Us Weekly, etc.) may not be credible, though they are current.Idelmund (talk) 23:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Merge. Obviously related topics and it never made sense to me that they were separated in the first place. Regarding length, I think both articles could benefit from some serious trimming in any case. Popcornfud (talk) 19:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Merge, as per my submitted request. The prose size of the resulting article is certainly a cause for concern, but a lot of the content in "Free Britney movement" is already contained in the "Britney Spears conservatorship dispute" article, and hence when merged correctly, the prose size of the latter article should be well within the guidelines stated in WP:SIZERULE. Theknine2 (talk) 14:34, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Merge, per previous messages. The topics are extremely similar, and I too have wondered for a while why they were ever separate to begin with. benǝʇᴉɯ 21:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Merge, given the extremely similar nature of both topics. The only thing I'm curious about is what will the final merged article's name be? Thanks. shanghai.talk to me 19:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I think the existing article title, Britney Spears conservatorship dispute, covers all the topics sufficiently. The Free Britney movement was part of the dispute. Popcornfud (talk) 15:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article doesn't really go into the religious dynamic, but the conservatorship has been seen in terms of conservative religous assumptions that a father should control his daughter's life. There's an interesting take on it here. --Doric Loon (talk) 10:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't really see at all how that has any relevance. 71.129.228.139 (talk) 21:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
