Talk:Boughton Monchelsea Place

Boughton Monchelsea Place has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 30, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Boughton Monchelsea Place/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:47, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lead

Do we have a year for the completion of the house? You should say the oldest part of the house dates to 1567–75, but there was a manor before this.
- Probably the closest thing to a completion date would be when the north and west wings were replaced - 1819. Done--DavidCane (talk) 22:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
"It has been a home to a number of members of parliament for Maidstone or for Kent." Can you please list some of the most notable owners and the dates they owned it as an effective summary.
Do we have an architectural style for this building which could be noted in the infobox? The infobox seems a bit empty. Please add the building dates at least.
- Added the four MPs who have articles into the lead.
- It does not really fit into a particular style of architecture; none is specifically identified in the listing details.
- I have added the dates into the box.--DavidCane (talk) 22:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Park

"The estate is private property and is not usually open to the public,". Do we know the name of the current owner?♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:59, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Boughton Monchelsea Place and Stately-homes.com websites list the owners as the Kendrick family. I was in two minds as to whether this should be included in the article, but I suppose, as they advertise this on the websites, there shouldn't be a problem with it going into the article. Thanks for the review.--DavidCane (talk) 22:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

No problem, thanks for addressing the points.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

This appears to meet the GA requirements. The history is quite impressive and informative. Good job. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Many Thanks. I'm pleased you enjoyed it.--DavidCane (talk) 10:13, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic