Talk:Birthright (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 25 October 2020
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Lack of Legal or Philosophical Doctrines/Ideas edit

It seems odd that the disambiguation page does not contain legal ideas or the historical (and one imagines philosophical) origins of the notion(s) of birth right.

ConcernedScientist (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seconded. Junuxx (talk) 10:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 25 October 2020 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 02:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply



BirthrightBirthright (disambiguation)Draft:Birthright is in sufficient shape to move to mainspace as the clear primary topic of the term. Move the current disambiguation page to make way for the draft. BD2412 T 03:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Support, with thanks to BD for nursing this draft through a long gestation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. For this to to be a primary I'd like to see some data backing up the claim that this is the primary topic, which I highly doubt. Let's see in a few months after it moves from draft if it pulls the numbers that show it. --Gonnym (talk) 01:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • After it moves from draft to what title? BD2412 T 01:14, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support It seems like a valid broad concept article and therefore the de facto primary topic.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 00:24, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.