Talk:Beagle-Harrier

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Me, Talking

edit

I assume you know you need some more refs. : )A mcmurray (talkcontribs) 08:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I'm working on them :) Calineed 08:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I finally managed to get quotations for all the facts you flagged up :) Calineed 20:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry

edit

I think we had an edit conflict but I had already lost my edit once due to it so I just went ahead. Sorry.A mcmurray (talkcontribs) 09:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

That's fine, I was just adding a citation. I re-added it. Calineed 09:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Cool. That's what I thought after I saw the second one you added. Whew. ::Wipes brow.::A mcmurray (talkcontribs) 09:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Refs: You could probably combine the refs that go to the same link.... IvoShandor 12:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beagle-Harrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply