Talk:Absa Bank (Mauritius) Limited

(Redirected from Talk:Barclays Bank Mauritius)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Pbsouthwood in topic Name Change - Absa Bank Mauritius

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barclays Bank Mauritius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Name Change - Absa Bank Mauritius edit

Good day,

I work for Corporate Image, Absa Group Limited's corporate communications agency.

Barclays Bank Mauritius has recently changed its name to Absa Bank Mauritius[1]. Please can the page name be modified accordingly.

Many thanks

Nicola Mawson (talk) 12:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

Reply 25-FEB-2020 edit

   Please use WP:RMCM  

  • Requests to change an article's title should be submitted using the {{requested move}} template specifically as a controversial move request process requiring discussion amongst the wider community.
  • A controversial requested move typically takes about 7 days to complete. Before taking this step, please ensure that you are acquainted with the requested move process by thoroughly reviewing its procedures. More information can be found at requested moves.

Regards,  Spintendo  11:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Spintendo, Why is this a controversial move? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 12:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unexceptionable move edit

This is proceduralism for its own sake. It is easy to Google to verify that the item is correct. There is no conflict of interest or paid editing issue when the editor is reporting a fact. Acad Ronin (talk) 12:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quite so. It is a bank, the name has been changed, it has been reported in several newspapers and news websites. There is no obvious reason why this should be controversial. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 12:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 February 2020 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Nicola Mawson, thank you for declaring your association with your employer and its relevance to your Wikipedia editing. If editing Wikipedia is part of your job, in that you get paid for your edits, please ensure you disclose it on your userpage in accordance with our paid editing guideline. On Wikipedia, even if a company's official name changes, we still use the most common name which is used by reliable sources to refer to the company. While you have provided a few press releases documenting the name change, you have not provided evidence that sources which are independent of the company and are considered reliable routinely refer to the company by its new name. My advice would be to find existing independent, reliable coverage of the company under its new name and cite it in the article, and then come back and make the proposal again. Should such coverage not yet exist, I'm afraid it will be a case of waiting until it does. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 11:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply



Barclays Bank MauritiusAbsa Bank Mauritius Good day,

I work for Corporate Image, Absa Group Limited's corporate communications agency.

Barclays Bank Mauritius has recently changed its name to Absa Bank Mauritius[1]. Please can the page name be modified accordingly.

Many thanks

Nicola Mawson (talk) 11:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC) Relisted. PI Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 03:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Note: members of WikiProjects "Companies" and "Business" have been notified of this request. PI Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 04:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose move. No evidence has been provided that the common name has changed. O.N.R. (talk) 07:51, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Re: Oppose move. Hi Old Naval Rooftops

There are quite a few articles on the name change, and all branches have been rebranded.

Here are some more articles:

1. https://www.lexpress.mu/article/371187/devoilement-lidentite-dabsa-bank-pravind-jugnauth-annonce-revision-bank-mauritius-act 2. https://defimedia.info/ravin-dajee-managing-director-dabsa-bank-mauritius-limited-etre-une-banque-africaine-en-phase-avec-lere-numerique 3. https://defimedia.info/voici-la-une-du-defi-quotidien-de-ce-jeudi-27-fevrier-2020 4. https://defimedia.info/voici-la-une-du-defi-quotidien-de-ce-jeudi-27-fevrier-2020 5. https://www.inside.news/la-barclays-operera-sous-le-nom-dabsa-bank-mauritius-limited-a-partir-du-10-fevrier/ 6. https://www.inside.news/la-barclays-sapprete-a-devenir-absa/ 7. https://www.lexpress.mu/article/334165/secteur-bancaire-goodbye-barclays-welcome-absa-bank

Trust this assists

Nicola Mawson (talk) 09:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.