Talk:Artoon

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was: not moved; redirect created. Station1 (talk) 01:49, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

---

Artoon → ARTOON CO., LTD. — Either a full move or have the new name redirect to the current one is fine. The new name is the proper name as shown in the official website's copyright. Hero of legend (talk) 22:53, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose move per WP:MOSTM: companies don't get to decide that it's "official" for Wikipedia to give them free promotional capitalization. --Closeapple (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

  That being said: A redirect from the full name to the short name might be appropriate, though one should consider whether that name, especially an all-caps version, is ever actually going to be wikilinked from an article. Also, I should clarify that it is sometime more common for Asian companies to use all-caps when writing Latin-character text, because the letter forms are more quickly understandable by Asians, not because they are attempting to stand out every time their brand name is mentioned, like some non-Asian companies. It is more likely that company doesn't even have an official position on whether their name should be capitalized in normal English usage. --Closeapple (talk) 02:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose per Wikipedia:Article titles#Standard English and trademarks. The full company name, however, should probably be used at the beginning of the lead (not in all caps, though) per WP:NCCORP. I'm neutral on the matter of the redirect; entering "ARTOON" in the search box already brings one to this article, and I'm not sure that "Artoon Co., Ltd." is really a likely search term, all caps or no. Deor (talk) 15:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Artoon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080804192910/http://www.artoon.co.jp:80/jp/profile.htm to http://www.artoon.co.jp/jp/profile.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080612200847/http://www.artoon.co.jp:80/eng/profile.htm to http://www.artoon.co.jp/eng/profile.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)