Talk:Armacell

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Justlettersandnumbers in topic Conflict-of-interest editing

Untitled

edit

Sehr geehrter Autor, über Armacell gibt es teilweise neuere, ergänzende Informationen. Sind Sie damit einverstanden, dass ich diese einfüge/korregiere?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Armacell

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, vielen Dank für die freundliche Benachrichtigung. Selbstverständlich sind Sie von mir herzlich dazu eingeladen, den Artikel jederzeit zu erweitern und/oder zu aktualisieren.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
The man from Nordhorn 18:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NordhornerII (talkcontribs)

edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.offshore-technology.com/contractors/corrosion/armacell/
    Triggered by \boffshore-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 22:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Article updated according to new information available

edit

Thank you for the time and interest invested in writing the artcile about Armacell. We have come across outdated information and have updated the article accordingly. Further reference links will be added. Thanks again. Best Regards, Armacell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.5.201.117 (talk) 15:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Armacell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

Working at the corporate communications and press department of Armacell, I would like to help keeping information on the company current and correct according to Wikipedia’s guidelines including those on WP:COI, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:NPOV. Working at the company, I am aware of my conflict of interest. So, all my edits will be restricted to talk pages, and I will not engage in editing directly any Armacell-related page. That’s why in a first step I want to make some suggestions on how to update and correct some details. Also, as a reaction to the template that is currently displayed on top of the page, I want to provide some more references and add some independent references to foster the NPOV principle and make Armacell's Wikipedia entry a reliable source. I am aware of my conflict of interest. So, could please take a moment to review my following suggestions. Then, if applicable, could you please declare the reference problem stated in the template as solved and remove the template? Thank you!

content redacted, copyright violations
<content redacted, copyright violations>

External links

  • Official Website > Link is not current anymore, current one: [1]
  • Armacell: Our Stories > Link is not current anymore, current one: [2]
  • Company Brochure > Company Brochure is not current anymore. Most current corporate document is the 2016 Annual Report that also includes a company presentation part: [3]

References
Some of the old references can be deleted as they are not current anymore.
For some there are additional external and independent references that I already mentioned in the changes above.
So the below are all sources that already appear in the suggestions above but for an easy overview and transparency I want to write them down again, here:

1. old one: http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=12827995

https://corporate.armacell.com/en/about-armacell/facts/

2. old one: http://corporate.armacell.com/en/about-armacell/facts/

3. old one: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-07-07. Retrieved 2011-06-19.

4. old one: https://www.bloomberg.com/profiles/companies/865176Z:GR-armacell-international-gmbh

6. old one: http://www.sunwindenergy.com/review/armacell-acquires-industrial-thermo-polymers-limited-itp

7. old one: Armacell acquires OneFlex – a leading Turkish insulation materials manufacturer

8. http://corporate.armacell.com/en/about-armacell/locations/

9. old one: http://corporate.armacell.com/en/press-room/press-releases/detail/view/armacell-presents-environmental-product-declarations-epds-for-its-elastomeric-insulation-materials/

10. http://corporate.armacell.com/en/about-armacell/sustainability/

11. old one: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2014-10-23. Retrieved 2014-10-23.

12. old one: http://corporate.armacell.com/en/products-solutions/advanced-insulation/

13. old one: http://corporate.armacell.com/en/products-solutions/engineered-foams/

14. old one: http://corporate.armacell.com/en/about-armacell/history/
I suggest to add various independent sources:

Tania from Armacell (talk) 18:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

  Partially implemented  Spintendo  ᔦᔭ  22:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Conflict-of-interest editing

edit

More than one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.

Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply