Talk:Arameisk-Syrianska IF
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Arameiska-Syrianska Botkyrka IF home ground or team photo be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Sweden may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Requested move 1 March 2017 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved.(non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 05:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Arameiska-Syrianska IF → Arameisk-Syrianska IF – They were previously known as Arameiska-Syrianska IF. Now they are called Arameisk-Syrianska IF. [1]
References
Gryf (talk) 08:48, 1 March 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 00:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: Gryf, the ref you cite does show that they are officially renamed, but has this rename been reflected in English usage? Andrewa (talk) 00:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. This is an obscure linguistic change removing an inflection, and possibly correcting an error but the evidence is that it has not taken hold even in Sweden. My attempt to Google the new name returned 107,000 ghits for the old name. Forcing the new name reduced this to 57,800, which will have included many false hits (owing to the fact that the name is shortened rather than lengthened). Andrewa (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arameiska-Syrianska IF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120311213525/http://www.gais.se/fotboll/GAIS.nsf/StatisticsByTeam?ReadForm&Lag=Arameiska-Syrianska%20KIF to http://www.gais.se/fotboll/GAIS.nsf/StatisticsByTeam?ReadForm&Lag=Arameiska-Syrianska%20KIF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 20 August 2017 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. The consensus is that when Google results are examined carefully, they tell us that Swedish sources generally used the proposed form, which has also the advantage of official status. — Amakuru (talk) 14:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Arameiska-Syrianska IF → Arameisk-Syrianska IF – This is the official name of the club according to many, and in my book reliable, sources, e.g. the official club site (including their official Facebook page) and The Swedish Football Association's official site. If we take a look at Google results, we find that the proposed name provides 256,000 results while the current name only provides 119,000 results. In the "news" section, the proposed name beats the current name with 240 to 179. Therefore, I believe that it would be wise to move this article. Mattias321 (talk) 09:41, 20 August 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 16:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Relisting considering that this same move was discussed in March of this year.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 16:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. It is disturbing that nom refers to the official name and to primary sources in their rationale. Both of these arguments were debunked in the previous RM. In view of this and the lack of participation I don't propose to waste time checking the other claims. Ping me again if there is any significant support. Andrewa (talk) 18:22, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Please, dear Andrewa, give me ONE good argument that this article should have an inaccurate name? If you look at the Google results, the proposed name is obviously more common? Do you think we should move FC Barcelona to Barcelona FC, Real Madrid C.F. to FC Real Madrid? // Mattias321 (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- Please, dear user:Mattias321, if you have evidence that the name is inaccurate in terms of the article naming policy then provide it. Links to your google searches would be a good start. All we need is the evidence. But I'm afraid that your opinion that it is obviously more common doesn't count for much, so until someone does this the article should not be moved, as there is no case for a move. Is that a good enough argument? Andrewa (talk) 03:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, Andrewa, here are the links: Arameiska-Syrianska IF (127,000 results), Arameisk-Syrianska IF (198,000 results). If we take a look at the news search: Arameiska-Syrianska IF (193 results), Arameisk-Syrianska IF (249 results). Therefore I believe that the article should be moved, all according to WP:COMMONNAME. // Mattias321 (talk) 12:05, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Please, dear user:Mattias321, if you have evidence that the name is inaccurate in terms of the article naming policy then provide it. Links to your google searches would be a good start. All we need is the evidence. But I'm afraid that your opinion that it is obviously more common doesn't count for much, so until someone does this the article should not be moved, as there is no case for a move. Is that a good enough argument? Andrewa (talk) 03:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Please, dear Andrewa, give me ONE good argument that this article should have an inaccurate name? If you look at the Google results, the proposed name is obviously more common? Do you think we should move FC Barcelona to Barcelona FC, Real Madrid C.F. to FC Real Madrid? // Mattias321 (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support per nom. I don't quite understand the above quarreling, but it's OK as I brought the popcorn with me. This club does not seem to have a common English name, and a significant (take a look at the pages rather than trusting Google's estimates at the top) majority of Swedish news sources, as well as the club's official name, supports the proposed change. No such user (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support It's the correct name. Number 57 20:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.