Mattias321

Home	Talk	Contributions	Sandbox (2)	Barnstars

Probably going inactive on Wikipedia

Since I pretty much lost the ambition to work on stuff on Wikipedia since @Qed237: "leadership", which have caused a lot of frustration and anger by several ambitious wikipedians, I think I won't feel ambitious to be updating the summary section on 2016 IFK Göteborg season anymore. If you want to keep the summary up and running, since Wikipedia often wants the articles to contain more texts than stats, then it's fine. IF not, you or I should probably delete the section. Thank you. // Psemmler (talk) 00:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Psemmler! Sorry to hear that you have lost your motivation, you have really been a great asset and help for me with the IFK Göteborg articles, especially since Reckless182 has retired. I'm guessing you're aiming on your discussion with Qed237 about the status of the matches against Estonia and Finland, and I don't think you should be so hard on him, I think he's just trying to to his job here on Wikipedia and he's doing it well. And I will absolutely update 2016 IFK Göteborg season, both stats, text and pictures. Have a nice day! :) // Mattias321 (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Career statistics for 2016

Hello,

I've added & updated career statistics on some Swedish players, for example Kevin Bisse. However, I stopped, because I didn't know if I should add a row for the 2016-season, since the season haven't begun yet and where they're playing for 2016 isn't certain. However, there's a 2016-season on-going around the world, and many career statistics have included numbers for 2016, so I felt that was right from the beginning. But what's your view of it? // Psemmler (talk) 20:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Glad too see you back att Wikipedia! I think it would be good to add the 2016 season, but only if the player has a confirmed contract with the club during that season! Have a nice weekend! // Mattias321 (talk) 14:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you and you too! That sounds like a good idea! // Psemmler (talk) 18:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Seger / oavgjort idag

Hej. Ska inte segern idag räknas som seger och inte oavgjort, även om den avgjordes efter 90min? Det skrivs ju ändå in som att IFK besegrade midtjylland efter straffar? //Psemmler (talk) 20:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Tjena, Psemmler! Jag var också lite tveksam till det för nåt år sedan, men det är tydligen praxis att använda sig av den färgen som resultatet var efter full tid. // Mattias321 (talk) 20:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Hej. Ledsen om jag blandar mig i er diskussion men jag vet att detta har diskuterats hos Football Project och därifrån är consensus att inte inkludera straffar. Under en normal match (ej försäsong) är straffar till för att avgöra vilket lag som går vidare och när det är dubbelmöten kan ett lag förlora under spelet men ändå vinna straffarna, vad ska man visa då? Vinst trots att man förlorade själva matchen? Därför inkluderas ej straffar (enligt vad jag har lärt mig), men jag har full förståelse för att i dessa speciella försäsongsmatcher, kan det kännas som en vinst. Samma ska för IFK Norrköping i Atlantic Cup, men jag har inte lagt in försäsong på den artikeln. Qed237 (talk) 21:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Du är jättevälkommen att blanda dig i. Jag håller ej med WP:Football, vilket iofs inte är någon skräll. En normal utslagningsmatch som exempelvis en VM-semifinal så kan ju matchen ej sluta oavgjort (ej avgörande), vilket betyder att matchen avgörs och vinns/förloras efter förlängning/straffar vid oavgjort vid full tid. Håller inte med om att straffar bara avgör vilket lag som går vidare, tycker mig att det klassas som vilket lag som vinnar matchen när matchen måste avgöras (icke oavgjort). Vid dubbelmöten är det ju särskilt då det är två matcher som slås ihop till ett o samma resultat, därav ser jag inte parallellen som du lägger fram som väsentlig. Jämför dagens match med exempelvis basket/baseballmatcher där det ej kan sluta oavgjort och lagen kan vinna/förlora efter förlängning. Hur jag bedömer fotbollsresultat vann IFK Göteborg dagens match i de regler som finns för turneringen. Oavgjort hade matchen blivit om den ej hade avgjorts, men det gjorde den ju. // Psemmler (talk) 21:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

En av motiveringarna är också att FIFA anser matcher som avgjorts på straffar som oavgjorda, vilket kan ses på deras statistik osv från t.ex. VM-turneringarna och många tycker om att följa FIFA. Om det är rätt eller fel finns olika synpunkter dock, men jag brukar ta för vana att lista de matcherna som oavgjorda. Qed237 (talk) 23:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Please explain your undos on my edits

Good afternoon,

Would you please mind why you undid my two edits on Billy Nordström & Victor Sköld? Firstly, from what I know, there's no agree upon on WP:Football to not include a division tab in your Career Statistics section, in fact - it's favoured to do, which is shown on the biggest football pages such as Cristiano Ronaldo. In my opinion, it's an important information to have on a Career Statistic page. To score 20 goals is easier to do for Östers IF, for an example, when they play in Division 1 rather than Allsvenskan. The second edit that I find wierd was that you also undid my tab for the 2016 season, which we agreed upon on this talk page was okay to do for players that had a contract with the club for the season to come. // Psemmler (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh, sorry! I didn't mean to revert them! I was just going to see what you'd changed! I'll fix it! // Mattias321 (talk) 14:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Ah, okay, it's fine, thank you for reverting back! Forza blåvitt idag. // Psemmler (talk) 14:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Forza Blåvitt indeed! :) Mot Futsalguld och seger mot Degerfors! // Mattias321 (talk) 14:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Futsal-guld i alla fall. Likt ifjol kryssar vi första cupenmatchen. Jag lade till spelare att skapa på din profil som uppnått notability-nivå, hoppas det var ok. Din profil är en bra samlingsplats för artiklar att skapa! // Psemmler (talk) 17:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

@Psemmler, Mm, förhoppningsvis går det bättre mot Frej. Jättebra att du lägger in spelare, men grejen är den är de spelarna inte är "notable". För att en spelare ska bli det krävs att den har spelat i någon av dessa ligor. Såvitt jag vet räcker inte en Svenska Cupen-match. // Mattias321 (talk) 17:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Jodå, det ska de vara enligt WP:FOOTYN punkt 2. // Psemmler (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Jaha, där ser man! Frågan är bara vilka klubbar räknas som "fully proffesional". Have played in a competitive fixture between two fully professional clubs in a domestic, Continental or Intercontinental club competition. Är både Allsvenskan och Superettan "fully proffesional" eller kör man på bara Allsvenskan här? // Mattias321 (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Jag har antagit att det bara är Allsvenska klubbar som räknas som professionellt, då det är den enda ligan på herrsidan i Sverige som är listad professionell på Wikipedia. Eftersom Östersund numer är allsvenskt bör alltså gårdagens match räknas in som en professionell match mellan två proffsklubbar, och spelarna som deltagade vara erkända nog för en artikel. Dock matcher där lag från superettan involverats i bör inte nå den statusen då själva ligan inte gör det enligt WP:Football. //Psemmler (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)*

Hmm, vet du varför inte nationalteams statsen visas i infoboxen på Andreas Vaikla? // Psemmler (talk) 02:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Enligt WP:FPL är endast Allsvenskan helt professionell, men som Psemmler skriver så räknas alla tävlingsmatcher mellan professionella klubbar (de som spelar i en liga listade i WP:FPL) så de som spelat i en cupmatch mellan två Allsvenska lag är notabla och kan ha en artikel. Sedan när det blir Europa matcher får man kolla WP:FPL om de allsvenska lagen har mött någon professionellt lag eller inte, att ha mött ett lag från till exempel Andorra räcker inte då de inte är listade, men möter man t.ex ett lag från högsta ligan i Skottland då är det nog för notabilitet. WP:NFOOTBALL och WP:FPL är nyckeln när man kollar notabilitet (tillsammans med WP:GNG förstås). Qed237 (talk) 11:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Divisionstab på Career Statistics

Hej,

Synd att du arkiverade din gamla tråd, hade varit enklare att fortsätta där med ett sådant litet ämne. Men hur står du dig till divionstab på spelarsidornas Career Statistics? Jag hade gärna velat lägga till det på befintliga IFK-spelares sidor, vvad tycker du? // Psemmler (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

2016–17 UEFA Europa League

Hi, hope you dont mind that I reverted your changes on 2016–17 UEFA Europa League where you removed the greek cup. Since nothing official has been released on how things will change, I added a note instead and I hope that was okay. Qed237 (talk) 22:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

re:Referees and cities

Hi. Sorry, I know I should be better on using edit summaries. Sometimes I am simply to lazy. Regarding the referees and cities, I usually link to the association they come from. In a European competition like CL or nationalteam match they represent a nation, such as Swedish Football Association, and in domestic matches they represent regional associations like West Riding County Football Association for referee Jon Moss in 2015 FA Cup Final. I have never myself used a link to just a city as I have not seen any reason for it, but I see now that is has been done before in Svenska Cupen for some reason. From what I have seen in those cup that has this extra information they often only uses it in final matches and then use regional associations (in sweden they are listed in Swedish Football Association#District Football Associations), but if you feel like we should use city it is definately not something I would argue over as it has been done before. It does not matter to me and I have never seen any discussion about it. Qed237 (talk) 12:45, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lawson Sabah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lawson Sabah, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:07, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Filip Sachpekidis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman

Ungdomslandskaper

Hur och var hittar du statistik för ungdomslandskaper? // Psemmler (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Hej, @Psemmler! Jag tar all min information från SvFF! Jag klickar mig vidare till det landslaget jag är intresserat av, tex P19/97 och där hittar jag statistiken. Under varje år ligger oftast statistik under "Spelare" följt av året. Annars hittar man statistiken vid varje landslagsuttagning. Trevlig helg! :) // Mattias321 (talk) 14:40, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Tack så mycket! Och trevlig helg på dig med:) // Psemmler (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 31 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Östersunds FK page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hahaha

Hahaha, gråter av skratt. Hysteriskt roligt att du uppdaterade matchinformationen utifrån vårt aprilskämt. Gud så bra. Hahaha! Ha en fin fredag och tagga premiär nu. // Psemmler (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Haha, trodde jag kunde lite på Alltid Blåvitt, men icke. ;) Detsamma! Krossa Falkenberg! // Mattias321 (talk) 16:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

16.00 på en vardag för hemmapremiär och derby vore något! ;-) // Psemmler (talk) 16:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Såja vad gött! // Psemmler (talk) 23:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Snyggt jobbat!

Snyggt jobbat att du uppdaterar säsongsartikel trots skrivbords- & motivationsförluster. kämpa! // Psemmler (talk) 22:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Júlio César

Júlio César can still play for Brazil. Do you have a source to support your claim? SLBedit (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello SLBedit! Yes, he still CAN play for Brazil, but after the 2014 FIFA World Cup, he stated that his international career was over. He hasn't been called up since then, so I think we can see that his Brazil career has ended. // Mattias321 (talk) 09:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)t

I see your point but "This is probably my last World Cup" is not definitive and also WP:FUTURE. See Jonas, for instance. SLBedit (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Brwa Nuri

Hi, this player now play with IraqI Natinal Team football. He is Iraqi Player , now he is trainnig with Iraqi Team in Erbil in North Iraq (Iraqi Kurdistan) , this player is Iraqi

I wait your answer

Thank you

Kurdistantolive (talk) 15:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello Kurdistantolive! I can see that he is in the Iraq national team at the moment, but he hasn't played any matches for them yet. The latest international game he played was for the Swedish U19 team and thus the flag should be Swedish. All according to Wikipedia praxis. // Mattias321 (talk) 15:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

If he play with Iraqi Team any matches we must change flag because he will become Iraqi player

Kurdistantolive (talk) 15:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, absolute! Just like I said. // Mattias321 (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Tack så mycket

Hej då

Kurdistantolive (talk) 17:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi , tonight i saw Brwa Nuri and spoke with him . I took this picture

Kurdistantolive (talk) 21:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Notability

Regarding your comment at this edit, neither Jonathan Lundberg nor Sebastian Ring have articles on the Swedish project, but there could be several reasons for this. WP:NFOOTBALL is the English project's guideline for notability. Have the players played in a fully professional league? If so, they deserve an article. You may want to follow the process at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:52, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Walter Görlitz! Both of them have played in Allsvenskan which is considered a notable league (Lundberg, Ring). Here can you find a list of all Allsvenskan players that should have an article. Cheers! // Mattias321 (talk) 20:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC) 14:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome home!

Skönt att du är hemma. Hoppas du hade det bra i Tyskland. Du får gärna avsluta med att utforska världen när det är säsong, dina uppdateringar behövs haha! // Psemmler (talk) 20:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mattias321. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Notability in football

If they're notable, that will be demonstrated when they have an article (see Wikipedia:NFOOTBALL). If they are not, placing a hidden comment is not going to make them notable. In other words, shut me up by writing the article not placing a comment. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Walter Görlitz, they have both played in Allsvenskan and that makes them notable according to WP:NFOOTBALL. I will create the page when I have time, but I actually don't see any problems with placing a hidden comment as a reminder. It's not bothering anybody, does it? But if it makes you happy I won't do it. ;) // Mattias321 (talk) 14:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

If player do not have an article, then there's no need to add a hidden comment. It sends the wrong message to editors. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Olympia

Hello Mattias ! I can see you might be interested in HIF , could you just have a look at Talk:Olympia (Helsingborg) please. Sorry if I disturbed. Boeing720 (talk) 23:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nicklas Bärkroth, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Oleola (talk) 22:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Örebro SK. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

This is just a formality. I don't disagree with the change, as long as it's made at the player article (and it sticks there) as I was reverted there as well. WP:BRD either on the player page or the team article and gain consensus.

For the record, you are at three reverts now and so am I. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Julian Kristoffersen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 14:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mattias321. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mattias321. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

March 2019

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify content, especially about living people. You didn't explain your chnages to Viktor Gyökeres or use a source. GiantSnowman 10:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Stats in football players' infoboxes

Hello, I'm Jaellee. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alexander Farnerud were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, --Jaellee (talk) 14:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

I concur with this, on Lasse Vibe. Beatpoet (talk) 12:21, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas Isherwood, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. GiantSnowman 10:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Henrik Larsson. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 10:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Coronavirus

I noticed that you updated the statistics of Belgium without referencing a source. Please cite a source the next time. I've reverted your edit with a relevant source. M nurhaikal (talk) 12:37, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Jesper Tolinsson

Hello, Mattias321

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nehme1499 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jesper Tolinsson, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesper Tolinsson.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nehme1499}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 17:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

@Nehme1499: If you look at the sources in the article, it's very clear that he does NOT fail WP:NFOOTY. He has played a game in Svenska Cupen between Allsvenskan teams IFK Göteborg and IK Sirius. And, because "players who have played in a competitive game between two teams from fully professional leagues will generally be regarded as notable", this article should not be deleted. // Mattias321 (talk) 17:46, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sead Hakšabanović, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 11:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sead Hakšabanović, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Needs a verifiable source in the article. Egghead06 (talk) 14:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

DEFAULTSORT space missing

Hey, I've been doing some WP:WCW work and several new articles you've created have had this issue. There should be a space after the comma in DEFAULTSORT. It makes it function incorrectly without the space. Jerod Lycett (talk) 16:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Piping

There is no convention for Swedish clubs in the same way as there is with German clubs (WP:KARLSRUHER), so please stop removing piped links. GiantSnowman 10:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Norrköping

Hi there. I don't really mind whether we pipe "IFK Norrköping" or not. But IFK Norrköping currently states "Idrottsföreningen Kamraterna Norrköping, more commonly known as IFK Norrköping or simply Norrköping"… That lead me to assume piping to "Norrköping" is okay. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Zlatan

Re Special:Diff/1013822597: Praxis per what guideline?Jonteemil (talk) 15:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Ping.Jonteemil (talk) 23:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Jonteemil, the national team career always spans from the first to the last cap in the infobox. It doesn't matter if the player in question retired from the national team and later returned. For example, even though Henrik Larsson retired from the national team in 2002, 2003 and 2006, his total Sweden career was between 1993 and 2009. // Mattias321 (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Per what Wikipedia guideline?Jonteemil (talk) 19:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Not sure, but that's nonetheless how everyone writes it. Ask at WP:WikiProject Football if your curious. // Mattias321 (talk) 12:07, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Erik Gunnarsson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erik Gunnarsson, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Gunnarsson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN

Hi there. Per WP:NOTBROKEN [[Left-back]] is to be preferred over [[Defender (association football)#Full-back|Left-back]]. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 13:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Women's team

Hallå Mattias! I know you do a lot of work on Sweden national football team, but is there any chance you could have a look at Sweden women's national football team if you find yourself having some extra time at some point? IP's there have been attempting to seemingly update the squad but have been struggling with the templates, I had a quick look at it but couldn't figure out why their edits made it come out the way it did. I ask you because I know you are experienced with working with these templates and types of articles. Thanks in advance. --TylerBurden (talk) 18:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi @TylerBurden! Sorry for the late response. I have prioritized Sweden and Sweden U21 since these are the national teams that I follow the most, but I can definitely take a look at the women's team as well! I might not have the time to go through the entire article, but I can at least update the squad. // Mattias321 (talk) 13:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Yea that's perfectly understandable, sorting out the squad would be great and more than enough as that seems to have been the main issue lately on that article. I appreciate it and no rush, you can do it whenever you have time to. TylerBurden (talk) 14:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Hussein Carneil

Hello, Mattias321,

Thank you for creating Hussein Carneil.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Facebook and Soccerway - none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tim van Assema

The article Tim van Assema has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Is now an amateur footballer at Tvååkers IF, only played 24 minutes professionally, lack of GNG sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Alexander Tengryd moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alexander Tengryd, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

William Lundin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, William Lundin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Ola Larsson moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ola Larsson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Tim van Assema for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim van Assema, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim van Assema until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Featured article review for IFK Goteborg

I have nominated IFK Göteborg for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 20:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Malick Yalcouyé moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Malick Yalcouyé. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 04:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi @JTtheOG! I have added more sources and content now, and have sent the article for review. // Mattias321 (talk) 17:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Lion Beqiri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lion Beqiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion Beqiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

zoglophie^•talk• 10:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)