Talk:Anders Sandberg

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

AFAIK, http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ is Anders current main page, not http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/main.html (which it was previous to my edit), if someone knows better than me, please revert.

Notability criteria edit

Removed notability tag. Notability is clearly met under WP:PROF criterion #7:

"7. The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.

Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area. A small number of quotations, especially in local news media, is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark."

Some examples of "frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area" are Deutsche Welle, Euronews, The Register, Daily Mail, Telegraph, New Scientist, Quartz, New Yorker, CNN, Popular Mechanics, Vice, Physics Today, Wired, BBC, Quartz, New Scientist, Daily Mail, Telegraph, Spectator, Popular Mechanics, The Guardian, Vice, NewsTalk, IB Times, The Atlantic, Science Focus, National Post, Daily Mail, The Guardian, Times of India, IB Times, Alphr, Live Science, Daily Mail, Ars Technica, Marketing Magazine, Daily Mail, The Guardian, Popular Mechanics, Financial Times.

(Note that the criterion is "being quoted as an academic expert", so these references count towards this, even if many might be trivial mentions under WP:GNG.) Spectra239 (talk) 23:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I agree with removing the notability tag, but for a simpler reason: we've already discussed whether he is notable in an AfD, which he passed. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anders Sandberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anders Sandberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply