Talk:Amber Tamblyn

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Indiecred in topic In Personal Life

Vegetarian edit

She is a vegetarian but wanted the spider to be killed?

She was 11 at the time, more than half her lifetime ago. This is just what various articles were reporting, that she wanted the character of the spider killed off, not the actual spider. Really, she just didn't want to have to work with a spider. No ill will toward the spider itself. -Siradia 20:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hmm. I could have sworn there was a bit of info about her having Arachnophobia on the main page before. It has since been cured by Paul McKenna when she appeared on the Ellen talk show. She held a tarantula in her hands without any visible signs of distress. Her favorite person is Tyler Norton.

Stephanie Daley edit

I think her role in the movie Stephanie Daley is worth mentioning in the first paragraph. Anyone who has watched the movie should agree with me, leaving aside the awards she bagged. Capo (talk) 17:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

No source... edit

She hasn't made references to her religious beliefs, if she has any, so leave it out of the categories please. IMDb and the articles and sites that link to it (e.g., Facebook) are not reliable. 98.198.83.12 (talk) 10:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I removed the "atheist" claim a few weeks ago but missed the agnostic category (which has been in for many years say 2006 or more). She has done some interviews and has mentioned religion (obviously) but nothing that precisely narrows her own views enough for it to be reliable enough for WP:BLP. Ttiotsw (talk) 06:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Personal life regarding David Cross edit

The article states she's "dating David Cross" - the famous, very Gay comedian? Gimme a break! It is an insult to Dave Cross. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theaternearyou (talkcontribs) 22:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is well supported by references. He does say it slightly differently here [1]. Though perhaps we could update the David Cross article with his own words, on this one we can stay with "dating" as that is how the media refer to it. Ttiotsw (talk) 06:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

First: David Cross is not gay. Second: they have been dating. Third: this Wikipedia entry says the two have split up, and cites an article that mentions nothing of the sort, and just says that they're dating. Fourth: I just saw his stand-up act last night where he says he's in a committed relationship with her. Sorry, but I'm going to edit this one myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.181.222 (talk) 13:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fifth, they're now married ... but the stupidity of the comment above lives on. -- 70.109.46.5 (talk) 20:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Soles edit

Amber Tamblyn proves she has very sexy feet in The Ring. There should be picture of her beautiful feet all over the page, and probably her ring too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.68.7 (talk) 22:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Photo edit

The photo at the top of the article today (photo) is the least representative, least recognizable photo of Amber Tamblyn that I have ever seen. Compare EVERY photo at Google image search. Somebody please. Whiner01 (talk) 06:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

just in the news/sexual assault edit

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Amber Tamblyn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Acceptable sources for birth date edit

Hiya! It does seem like Amber's birthday is May 14, 1983. The first reference on the Amber Tamblyn article page - i.e. http://www.filmreference.com/film/58/Amber-Tamblyn.html - confirms it, and matches the IMDB entry. Are either of these websites acceptable for Wikipedia? I can add and cite this if you think it's acceptable. If not - where should I be looking? JellieCat (talk) 06:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't look like a WP:RS to me. It seems to have used IMDB and Wikipedia as its sources, neither of which make it a reliable source. Who publishes it, and is there any reason to consider it reliable? TJRC (talk) 23:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm having a hard time finding an acceptable source for her birthday. Is there a site that Wikipedians generally use? Can you site their official Facebook page? (i.e. https://www.facebook.com/pg/officialambertamblyn/about/?ref=page_internal) That page does state: "The only official facebook page and group for Amber Tamblyn - Actress, poet and professional sunbather. Maintained and run by Amber and her minion." and lists her birthday as "Born on May 14, 1983" JellieCat (talk) 00:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If it's really her Facebook page, I think that's acceptable.
On the more general question of having trouble finding an acceptable source: that's really not a problem. If there's no acceptable source, we just leave the information out. If a fact about a subject is not generally reported, we shouldn't be in the business of reporting it first. That's not Wikipedia's mission. But in this case, I think you found a good source. TJRC (talk) 00:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amber Tamblyn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

In Personal Life edit

The last paragraph in Personal life is one long sentence, the beginning of which makes no sense:

“ In a series of September 2017 later reiterated in an open letter published in Teen Vogue, Tamblyn said that actor James Woods tried to seduce her and a friend, as well as take them to Las Vegas, when both were sixteen and Woods was aware of the fact; the three were at a restaurant.[39][40]”

Anyone have any idea what it’s supposed to mean? “In a series of September 2017 INTERVIEWS AND”? Could that be what it means? Indiecred (talk) 08:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply