This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! | ![]() |
![]() | A fact from Alison Hughes appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 January 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Undue
editThis is not terrible by any stretch, especially when compared to some of the stuff that gets added to to umpire/referee articles, but the single sentence saying that a player disputed a call she made seems little undue. We have an umpire with over 20 years of top level officiating so to mention a single incident in this career (even briefly) seems to violate WP:BALASP. This also lacks some context and any indication that the incident had any lasting effect on her career. AIRcorn (talk) 18:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
I looked at the associated 2015 Wimbledon Championships article and could not find a mention of the incident there. This seems like a better place to put this inforamtion as it can be expanded on without as much fear of becoming WP:undue. AIRcorn (talk)
- Fine by me if others agree. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Joseph2302 and Aircorn: I have just reviewed that article at DYK. I think that Aircorn make a good point and that the sentence should be removed. – Ianblair23 (talk) 12:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Removed. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)