This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
If Luykx was a member of the Waffen-SS and was charged and convicted to 20 years' imprisonment, then why is it necessary to insert accused, per the recent edit? I think he could only get defined as accused former Nazi because of a supposition about his Waffen-SS membership. However, that does not imply membership of the Nazi party, AFAIK. And the success of the Belgian authorities' conviction would eliminate the need for us to state such an accusation, right? But in any case, it's not clear what he was actually convicted of. I suggest changing the text to former Nazi sympathizer. jxm (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have accessed the Vincent Browne article in the Sunday Business Post (the link in the article is dead), and neither it nor the Dáil debate are the source for 90% of the article. I am removing all the unsourced content i.e. nearly everything. Scolaire (talk) 10:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
