Talk:Adrianople vilayet

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

---

Edirne Vilayet → Adrianople Vilayet – per WP:COMMONNAME and Wikipedia:USEENGLISH

• "Vilayet of Adrianople" -Llc (1960-2011) 187 results
• "Adrianople Vilayet" -Llc (1960-2011) 107 results
• "Edirne Vilayet" -Llc (1960-2011) 76 results
• "Vilayet of Edirne" -Llc (1960-2011) 56 results

Cf. "Vilayet of Adrianople" -Llc (1800-2011) 1,340 results

Takabeg (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adrianople Vilayet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525090909/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Adrianople%2C_Turkey_%28Capital%29 to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Adrianople%2C_Turkey_%28Capital%29

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adrianople Vilayet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007185405/http://www.tsk.tr/8_TARIHTEN_KESITLER/8_1_Ermeni_Sorunu/konular/ermeni_faaliyetleri_pdf/Arsiv_Belgeleriyle_Ermeni_Faaliyetleri_Cilt_1.pdf to http://www.tsk.tr/8_TARIHTEN_KESITLER/8_1_Ermeni_Sorunu/konular/ermeni_faaliyetleri_pdf/Arsiv_Belgeleriyle_Ermeni_Faaliyetleri_Cilt_1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 2 February 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 21:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

---

• Adrianople Vilayet → Adrianople vilayet
• Bosnia Vilayet → Bosnia vilayet
• Constantinople Vilayet → Constantinople vilayet
• Danube Vilayet → Danube vilayet
• Janina Vilayet → Janina vilayet
• Kosovo Vilayet → Kosovo vilayet
• Manastir Vilayet → Manastir vilayet
• Montenegro Vilayet → Montenegro vilayet
• Salonica Vilayet → Salonica vilayet
• Scutari Vilayet → Scutari vilayet
• Aleppo Vilayet → Aleppo vilayet
• Basra Vilayet → Basra vilayet
• Beirut Vilayet → Beirut vilayet
• Hejaz Vilayet → Hejaz vilayet
• Mosul Vilayet → Mosul vilayet
• Syria Vilayet → Syria vilayet
• Yemen Vilayet → Yemen vilayet
• Adana Vilayet → Adana vilayet
• Angora Vilayet → Angora vilayet
• Bitlis Vilayet → Bitlis vilayet
• Diyarbekir Vilayet → Diyarbekir vilayet
• Erzurum Vilayet → Erzurum vilayet
• Hüdavendigâr Vilayet → Hüdavendigâr vilayet
• Kastamonu Vilayet → Kastamonu vilayet
• Konya Vilayet → Konya vilayet
• Mamuret-ul-Aziz Vilayet → Mamuret-ul-Aziz vilayet
• Sivas Vilayet → Sivas vilayet
• Van Vilayet → Van vilayet
• Trebizond Vilayet → Trebizond vilayet

– For all of these vilayets that I checked, there is either no consistent capitalization or the lowercase predominates. For example, see the ngrams for Mosul vilayet, Van vilayet, Aleppo vilayet, Bitlis vilayet, Salonica vilayet, or Adana vilayet. Per MOS:CAPS/WP:NCCAPS, the article title should only be capitalized if it is consistently capitalized in reliable sources. This proposed move only affects the capitalization. (t · c) buidhe 11:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

• Support: the evidence is compelling. Cinderella157 (talk) 13:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
• Support: go for it. What about the Eyalets, maybe expand move to them as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paradise Chronicle (talk • contribs)
• Support, but not until after I did my own research... Dicklyon (talk) 01:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.