Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 20 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Maddiemac800.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled edit

Sorry princess, but a giggly girl review is not what Wikipedia is all about.

Perhaps, but remember: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. I have made an attempt to restore some useful NPOV information from the "giggly girl review" you deleted; it is often worth trying to NPOV, even when it seems impossible, rather than just reverting. Glenn Willen (Talk) [[]] 05:41, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hear hear. No-one wants to be intimidated and seeing one's work deleted is off putting and surely unecessary. XCSDDFSGCAitlin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.75.63.232 (talk) 19:45, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

The plot was over detailed and subjectivley writen.

Once again: The plot is still (or again) incredibly unobjective, juvenile and unneeded bloated! Please remove the plot and leave a remark!

working to improve this page edit

I am a student who will be working on this page for the next few weeks as a part of a class assignment. I will be attempting to primarily improve the plot summary, in terms of length and objectivity.I will also attempt to introduce new information about the film to this page. Feedback is welcome to any of my edits or additions, as I am learning the platform and doing the best I can. Thanks Maddiemac800 (talk) 17:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply