Talk:2015 Japanese military legislation

A news item involving 2015 Japanese military legislation was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 21 September 2015.

Wikipedia

Japan: Law & government / Military history / Update Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:22, July 3, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Law and government task force.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

This article is supported by the Update task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Military history: Asian / Japanese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 12 February 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus is that current title is more recognizable. Reminder: WP:COMMONNAMEs generally trump WP:OFFICIAL names on WP in title decision-making. (non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 19:30, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

2015 Japanese military legislation → Legislation for Peace and Security – This name is used in official Japanese government documents/presentations released to the public. Ominae (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Inclined to oppose due to lower recognizability. Is the proposed title in common use? (It's a redlink at this point.) It also seems like a euphemism. Dekimasuよ! 05:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Oppose due to recognizability. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Not a vote on this matter. I'm updating to say that I forgot to mention the name is given out in official Japanese government documentation in English by the MOFA/MOD. Ominae (talk) 04:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic