Talk:2004 United States men's Olympic basketball team
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2004 United States men's Olympic basketball team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111101085351/http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly1_box.html to http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly1_box.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131417140900/http://www.usabasketball.com/ to http://www.usabasketball.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 2004 United States men's Olympic basketball team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100103175736/http://usabasketball.com/news.php?news_page=moly_2004 to http://usabasketball.com/news.php?news_page=moly_2004
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105005631/http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly2_box.html to http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly2_box.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105005708/http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly3_box.html to http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly3_box.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121220023300/http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly4_box.html to http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly4_box.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120214112339/http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly5_box.html to http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly5_box.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105005644/http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly6_box.html to http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly6_box.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105005652/http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly83_box.html to http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2004/04_moly83_box.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Heavily favored
edit@JimKaatFan: Reagrding the point that 81.9.126.76 brought up at User_talk:Bagumba#Dream_Team about whether this team was "heavily favored", I do have some concerns looking at the curent article. I have to agree that Social Psychology in Sport and the Miami Herald article is unclear whether they were referring to the odds for the gold medal or just the Puerto Rico game. While Creativity in Groups was explicit that they were referring to gold, I also think that if this was a widely-held opinion, we should be able to find expert basketball sources that than relying on sociology books. We also need to balance that in hindsight, many sources after the fact are saying that 2004 was perhaps the weakest teem talent-wise the US has fielded in the Olympics since the Dream Team. Let me know your thoughts.—Bagumba (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sure there's more sources around. I'll take a look. JimKaatFan (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hey Bagumba, I also was wondering about the "biggest loss" bit while I was editing this article, but with all the trouble from that IP I lost track of it. It's been sitting there unsourced since the article was created 6 years ago. Your "citation needed" tag reminded me it was there - I have a feeling it might not even be accurate, and I certainly can't find a source for it myself. I did find a different factoid in a CNN article about how that loss broke a 24-game winning streak in the Olympics for the USA team. I can just replace it with that; if you think it needs something else, feel free to revert. Thanks. JimKaatFan (talk) 14:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
I removed "heavily" from "favored". I added an SI source, which said they were in danger of being upset.—Bagumba (talk) 13:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)