Economy of Myanmar
Myanmar (also known as Burma) is an emerging economy with a nominal GDP of $69.322 billion in 2017 and an estimated purchasing power adjusted GDP of $327.629 billion in 2017 according to World Bank. For 2018 estimate, the country's per capita will be $6,509 in PPP per capita and $1,490 in nominal per capita.
Sakura Tower in Yangon
|1 October– 30 September|
|WTO, ASEAN, BIMSTEC|
|GDP||$69.322 billion (nominal) (2017 est.)|
$327.629 billion (PPP) (2017 est.)
|GDP rank||70th (nominal)|
|7.0% (2015), 5.9% (2016), |
6.4% (2017e), 6.7% (2018f) 
GDP per capita
|$6,509 (PPP) (2018 est) $1,490 (Nominal) (2018 est)|
GDP by sector
|agriculture: 24.8%, industry: 35.4%, services: 39.9% (2017 est.)|
|5.9% (2014 est.)|
Population below poverty line
|19.4% (2015) |
|33.00 million (2011 est.)|
Labour force by occupation
|agriculture: 70%, industry: 8%, services: 22% (2001)|
|Unemployment||4% (2017) |
|agricultural processing; wood and wood products; copper, tin, tungsten, iron; cement, construction materials; pharmaceuticals; fertiliser; petroleum and natural gas; garments, jade and gems|
|Exports||$14.84 billion(2018 official figure) note: official export figures are grossly underestimated due to the value of timber, gems, narcotics, rice, and other products smuggled to Thailand, China, and Bangladesh|
|natural gas, wood products, pulses, beans, fish, rice, clothing, jade and gems|
Main export partners
| China 42.13% |
Singapore 3.94% (2017 official figures.)
|Imports||$18.68 billion (2018 official figure) note: import figures are grossly underestimated due to the value of consumer goods, diesel fuel, and other products smuggled in from Thailand, China, Malaysia, and India|
|fabric, petroleum products, plastics, fertiliser, machinery, transport equipment, cement, construction materials, crude oil; food products, edible oil|
Main import partners
| China 33.4% |
(2017 official figures.)
|$11 billion (2012)|
|Expenses||$4.272 billion (2011 est.)|
|Economic aid||recipient: $127 million (2001 est.)|
|$8 billion (as of January 2013)|
According to Michael Adas, Ian Brown, and other economic historians of Burma, Burma's pre-colonial economy in Burma was essentially a subsistence economy, with the majority of the population involved in rice production and other forms of agriculture. Burma also lacked a formal monetary system until the reign of King Mindon Min in the middle 19th century.
All land was technically owned by the Burmese monarch. Exports, along with oil wells, gem mining and teak production were controlled by the monarch. Burma was vitally involved in the Indian Ocean trade. Logged teak was a prized export that was used in European shipbuilding, because of its durability, and became the focal point of the Burmese export trade from the 1700s to the 1800s.
British Burma (1885–1948)Edit
After Burma was conquered by the British, it became the second wealthiest country in Southeast Asia, after the Philippines. It was also once the world's largest exporter of rice. During British administration, Burma supplied oil through the Burmah Oil Company. This supplying market received a setback through the great depression in the 1930s. Burma suffered, like other countries in this region, from the decline in the total level of global trade. Burma also had a wealth of natural and labour resources. It produced 75% of the world's teak and had a highly literate population. The country was believed to be on the fast track to development.
After a parliamentary government was formed in 1948, Prime Minister U Nu embarked upon a policy of nationalisation. He attempted to make Burma a welfare state by adopting central planning measures. The government also tried to implement a poorly thought out Eight-Year plan. But by the 1950s, rice exports had increased by two thirds and mineral exports by over 96%. Plans were implemented in setting up light consumer industries by private sector. The 1962 Burmese coup d'état, was followed by an economic scheme called the Burmese Way to Socialism, a plan to nationalise all industries, with the exception of agriculture. The catastrophic program turned Burma into one of the world's most impoverished countries. Burma's admittance to least developed country status by the United Nations in 1987 highlighted its economic bankruptcy.
Military rule (1988–2011)Edit
After 1988, the regime retreated from totalitarian socialism. It permitted modest expansion of the private sector, allowed some foreign investment, and received much needed foreign exchange. The economy was rated in 2009 as the least free in Asia (tied with North Korea). All fundamental market institutions are suppressed. Private enterprises are often co-owned or indirectly owned by state. The corruption watchdog organisation Transparency International in its 2007 Corruption Perceptions Index released on 26 September 2007 ranked Burma the most corrupt country in the world, tied with Somalia.
The national currency is the kyat. Burma currently has a dual exchange rate system similar to Cuba. The market rate was around two hundred times below the government-set rate in 2006. In 2011, the Burmese government enlisted the aid of International Monetary Fund to evaluate options to reform the current exchange rate system, to stabilise the domestic foreign exchange trading market and creates economic distortions. The dual exchange rate system allows for the government and state-owned enterprises to divert funds and revenues, but also gives the government more control over the local economy and temporarily subdue inflation.
Inflation averaged 30.1% between 2005 and 2007. Inflation is a serious problem for the economy. In April 2007, the National League for Democracy organised a two-day workshop on the economy. The workshop concluded that skyrocketing inflation was impeding economic growth. "Basic commodity prices have increased from 30% to 60% since the military regime promoted a salary increase for government workers in April 2006," said Soe Win, the moderator of the workshop. "Inflation is also correlated with corruption." Myint Thein, an NLD spokesperson, added: "Inflation is the critical source of the current economic crisis."
In recent years, both China and India have attempted to strengthen ties with the government for economic benefit. Many nations, including the United States and Canada, and the European Union, have imposed investment and trade sanctions on Burma. The United States banned all imports from Burma, though this restriction was since lifted. Foreign investment comes primarily from People's Republic of China, Singapore, South Korea, India, and Thailand.
Economic liberalisation (2011–present)Edit
In 2011, when new President Thein Sein's government came to power, Burma embarked on a major policy of reforms including anti-corruption, currency exchange rate, foreign investment laws and taxation. Foreign investments increased from US$300 million in 2009-10 to a US$20 billion in 2010-11 by about 6567%. Large inflow of capital results in stronger Burmese currency, kyat by about 25%. In response, the government relaxed import restrictions and abolished export taxes. Despite current currency problems, Burmese economy is expected to grow by about 8.8% in 2011. After the completion of 58-billion dollar Dawei deep seaport, Burma is expected be at the hub of trade connecting Southeast Asia and the South China Sea, via the Andaman Sea, to the Indian Ocean receiving goods from countries in the Middle East, Europe and Africa, and spurring growth in the ASEAN region.
In 2012, the Asian Development Bank formally began re-engaging with the country, to finance infrastructure and development projects in the country. The $512 million loan is the first issued by the ADB to Myanmar in 30 years and will target banking services, ultimately leading to other major investments in road, energy, irrigation and education projects.
In March 2012, a draft foreign investment law emerged, the first in more than 2 decades. This law oversees unprecedented liberalisation of the economy. It for example stipulates that foreigners no longer require a local partner to start a business in the country, and are able to legally lease land. The draft law also stipulates that Burmese citizens must constitute at least 25% of the firm's skilled workforce, and with subsequent training, up to 50-75%.
On 28 January 2013, the government of Myanmar announced deals with international lenders to cancel or refinance nearly $6 billion of its debt, almost 60 per cent of what it owes to foreign lenders. Japan wrote off US$3 Billion, nations in the group of Paris Club wrote off US$2.2 Billion and Norway wrote off US$534 Million.
Myanmar's inward foreign direct investment has steadily increased since its reform. The country approved US$4.4 billion worth of investment projects between January and November 2014.
According to one report released on 30 May 2013, by the McKinsey Global Institute, Burma's future looks bright, with its economy expected to quadruple by 2030 if it invests in more high-tech industries. This however does assume that other factors (such as drug trade, the continuing war of the government with specific ethnic groups, etc.) do not interfere.
As of October 2017, less than 10% of Myanmar‘s population has a bank account. As of 2016-17 approximately 98 percent of the population has smartphones and mobile money schemes are being implemented without the use of banks similar to African countries.
Still unresolved internal problemsEdit
In a first ever countrywide study the Myanmar government found that 37 per cent of the nation’s population are unemployed and an average of 26 per cent live in poverty.
The current state of the Burmese economy has also had a significant impact on the people of Burma, as economic hardship results in extreme delays of marriage and family building. The average age of marriage in Burma is 27.5 for men, 26.4 for women, almost unparalleled in the region, with the exception of developed countries like Singapore.
Burma also has a low fertility rate, of 2.07 children per woman (2010), especially as compared to other Southeast Asian countries of similar economic standing, like Cambodia (3.18) and Laos (4.41), representing a significant decline from 4.7 in 1983, despite the absence of a national population policy. This is at least partly attributed to the economic strain that additional children place on the family income, and has resulted in the prevalence of illegal abortions in the country, as well as use of other forms of birth control.
The 2012 foreign investment law draft, included a proposal to transform the Myanmar Investment Commission from a government-appointed body into an independent board. This could bring greater transparency to the process of issuing investment licenses, according to the proposed reforms drafted by experts and senior officials. However, even with this draft, it will still remain a question on whether corruption in the government can be addressed (links have been shown between certain key individuals inside the government and the drug trade, as well as many industries that use forced labour -for example the mining industry-).
The major agricultural produce is rice which covers about 60% of the country's total cultivated land area. Rice accounts for 97% of total food grain production by weight. Through collaboration with the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), 52 modern rice varieties were released in the country between 1966 and 1997, helping increase national rice production to 14 million tons in 1987 and to 19 million tons in 1996. By 1988, modern varieties were planted on half of the country's rice fields, including 98% of the irrigated areas. In 2011, Myanmar's total milled rice production accounted for 10.26 million tons, an increase from the 1.8 per cent back in 2010.
In northern Burma opium bans have ended a century old tradition of growing poppy. Between 20,000 and 30,000 ex-poppyfarmers left the Kokang region as a result of the ban in 2002. People from the Wa region, where the ban was implemented in 2005, fled to areas where growing opium is still possible. Other ex-poppyfarmers are being relocated to areas near rubber plantations. These are often mono-plantations from Chinese investors.
The lack of an educated workforce skilled in modern technology contributes to the growing problems of the economy.
Lately, the country lacks adequate infrastructure. Goods travel primarily across Thai and China borders and through the main port in Yangon.
Railroads are old and rudimentary, with few repairs since their construction in the late nineteenth century. Presently China and Japan are providing aid to upgrade rail transport. Highways are normally paved, except in the remote border regions. Energy shortages are common throughout the country including in Yangon. About 30 percent of the country's population is without electricity, with 70 per cent of people living in rural areas.The civilian government has indicated that electricity will be imported from Laos to fulfill demand.
Other industries include agricultural goods, textiles, wood products, construction materials, gems, metals, oil and natural gas.
The garment industry is a major job creator in the Yangon area, with around 200,000 workers employed in total in mid-2015. The Myanmar Government has introduced minimum wage of MMK 4,800 (US$3.18) per day for the garment workers from March 2018.
The Myanmar garments sector has seen significant influx of foreign direct investment, if measured by the number of entries rather than their value. In March 2012, six of Thailand's largest garment manufacturers announced that they would move production to Burma, principally to the Yangon area, citing lower labour costs. In mid-2015, about 55% of officially registered garment firms in Myanmar were known to be fully or partly foreign-owned, with about 25% of the foreign firms from China and 17% from Hong Kong. Foreign-linked firms supply almost all garment exports, and these have risen rapidly in recent years, especially since EU sanctions were lifted in 2012. Myanmar exported $1.6 billion worth of garment and textiles in 2016.
Illegal drug tradeEdit
Burma (Myanmar) is the largest producer of methamphetamines in the world, with the majority of ya ba found in Thailand produced in Burma, particularly in the Golden Triangle and Northeastern Shan State, which borders Thailand, Laos and China. Burmese-produced Ya ba is typically trafficked to Thailand via Laos, before being transported through the northeastern Thai region of Isan.
In 2010, Burma trafficked 1 billion tablets to neighbouring Thailand. In 2009, Chinese authorities seized over 40 million tablets that had been illegally trafficked from Burma. Ethnic militias and rebel groups (in particular the United Wa State Army) are responsible for much of this production; however, the Burmese military units are believed to be heavily involved in the trafficking of the drugs.
Burma is also the 2nd largest supplier of opium (following Afghanistan) in the world, with 95% of opium grown in Shan State. Illegal narcotics have generated $1 to $2 billion USD in exports annually, with estimates of 40% of the country's foreign exchange coming from drugs. Efforts to eradicate opium cultivation have pushed many ethnic rebel groups, including the United Wa State Army and the Kokang to diversify into methamphetamine production.
Prior to the 1980s, heroin was typically transported from Burma to Thailand, before being trafficked by sea to Hong Kong, which was and still remains the major transit point at which heroin enters the international market. Now, drug trafficking has circumvented to southern China (from Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangxi, Guangdong) because of a growing market for drugs in China, before reaching Hong Kong.
The prominence of major drug traffickers have allowed them to penetrate other sectors of the Burmese economy, including the banking, airline, hotel and infrastructure industries. Their investment in infrastructure have allowed them to make more profits, facilitate drug trafficking and money laundering. The share of informal economy in Myanmar is one of the largest in the world that feeds into trade in illegal drugs.
Oil and gasEdit
- Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise (MOGE) is a national oil and gas company of Burma. The company is a sole operator of oil and gas exploration and production, as well as domestic gas transmission through a 1,900-kilometre (1,200 mi) onshore pipeline grid.
- The Yadana Project is a project to exploit the Yadana gas field in the Andaman Sea and to carry natural gas to Thailand through Myanmar.
- Sino-Burma pipelines refers to planned oil and natural gas pipelines linking the Burma's deep-water port of Kyaukphyu (Sittwe) in the Bay of Bengal with Kunming in Yunnan province, China.
- The Norwegian company Seadrill owned by John Fredriksen is involved in offshore oildrilling, expected to give the Burmese Military Junta oil and oil export revenues.
- Myanmar exported $3.5 billion worth of gas, mostly to Thailand in the fiscal year up to March 2012.
- Initiation to bid on oil exploration licenses for 18 of Myanmar’s onshore oil blocks has been released on 18 January 2013.
Myanmar has rich solar power and hydropower potential. Country's technical solar power potential is the highest among the nations of the Greater Mekong Subregion. Wind energy, biogas and biomass have limited potential and weakly developed.
The Union of Myanmar's rulers depend on sales of precious stones such as sapphires, pearls and jade to fund their regime. Rubies are the biggest earner; 90% of the world's rubies come from the country, whose red stones are prized for their purity and hue. Thailand buys the majority of the country's gems. Burma's "Valley of Rubies", the mountainous Mogok area, 200 km (120 mi) north of Mandalay, is noted for its rare pigeon's blood rubies and blue sapphires.
Myanmar is famed for its production of Golden South Sea Pearls. In recent years, the countries has auctioned its production in Hong Kong, first organized by Belpearl company in 2013 to critical acclaim and premium prices due to strong Chinese demand. Notable pearls include the New Dawn of Myanmar, a 19mm round golden pearl which sold to an anonymous buyer for undisclosed price.
In 2007, following the crackdown on pro-democracy protests in Myanmar, human rights organisations, gem dealers, and US First Lady Laura Bush called for a boycott of a Myanmar gem auction held twice yearly, arguing that the sale of the stones profits the dictatorial regime in that country. Debbie Stothard of the Alternative ASEAN Network on Burma stated that mining operators used drugs on employees to improve productivity, with needles shared, raising the risk of HIV infection: "These rubies are red with the blood of young people." Brian Leber (41-year-old jeweller who founded The Jewellers' Burma Relief Project) stated that: "For the time being, Burmese gems should not be something to be proud of. They should be an object of revulsion. It's the only country where one obtains really top quality rubies, but I stopped dealing in them. I don't want to be part of a nation's misery. If someone asks for a ruby now I show them a nice pink sapphire."
Richard W. Hughes, author of Ruby and Sapphire, a Bangkok-based gemologist who has made many trips to Burma makes the point that for every ruby sold through the junta, another gem that supports subsistence mining is smuggled over the Thai border. Burma's gemstone industry is a cornerstone of the Burmese economy with exports topping $1 billion.
The permits for new gem mines in Mogoke, Mineshu and Nanyar state will be issued by the ministry according to a statement issued by the ministry on 11 February. While many sanctions placed on the former regime were eased or lifted in 2012, the US has left restrictions on importing rubies and jade from Myanmar intact. According to recent amendments to the new Myanmar foreign investment law, there is no longer a minimum capital requirement for investments, except in mining ventures, which require substantial proof of capital and must be documented through a domestic bank. Another important clarification in the investment law is the dropping of foreign ownership restrictions in joint ventures, except in restricted sectors, such as mining, where FDI will be capped at 80 per cent.
Since 1992, the government has encouraged tourism. Until 2008, fewer than 750,000 tourists entered the country annually, but there has been substantial growth over the past years. In 2012, 1.06 million tourists visited the country, and 1.8 million are expected to visit by the end of 2013.
Tourism is thus a growing sector of the economy of Burma. Burma has diverse and varied tourist attractions and is served internationally by numerous airlines via direct flights. Domestic and foreign airlines also operate flights within the country. Cruise ships also dock at Yangon. Overland entry with a border pass is permitted at several border checkpoints. The government requires a valid passport with an entry visa for all tourists and business people. As of May 2010, foreign business visitors from any country can apply for a visa on arrival when passing through Yangon and Mandalay international airports without having to make any prior arrangements with travel agencies. Both the tourist visa and business visa are valid for 28 days, renewable for an additional 14 days for tourism and three months for business. Seeing Burma through a personal tour guide is popular. Travelers can hire guides through travel agencies.
 Aung San Suu Kyi has requested that international tourists not visit Burma. The junta's forced labour programmes were focused around tourist destinations which have been heavily criticised for their human rights records. Even disregarding the obviously governmental fees, Burma’s Minister of Hotels and Tourism Major-General Saw Lwin recently admitted that the government receives a significant percentage of the income of private sector tourism services. Not to mention the fact that only a very small minority of impoverished ordinary people in Burma ever see any money with any relation to tourism.
Before 2012, much of the country was completely off-limits to tourists, and the military very tightly controlled interactions between foreigners and the people of Burma. Locals were not allowed to discuss politics with foreigners, under penalty of imprisonment, and in 2001, the Myanmar Tourism Promotion Board issued an order for local officials to protect tourists and limit "unnecessary contact" between foreigners and ordinary Burmese people. Since 2012, Burma has opened up to more tourism and foreign capital, synonymous with the country's transition to democracy.
The Myanmar Infrastructure Summit 2018 noted that Myanmar has an urgent need to “close its infrastructure gap”, with an anticipated expenditure of US$120 billion funding its infrastructural projects between now and 2030. More specifically, infrastructural development in Myanmar should address three major challenges over the upcoming years: 1) Road modernization and integration with neighboring roads and transportation networks; 2) Development of regional airports and expansion of existing airport capacity, and 3) Maintenance and consolidation of urban transport infrastructure, through instalments of innovative transportation tools including but not limited to water-taxis and air-conditioned buses. Myanmar needs to scale up its enabling infrastructure like transport, power supply and public utilities. 
|Sr. No.||Description||2006–2007 Budget Trade Volume||2006–2007 Real Trade Volume|
|Export||Import||Trade Volume||Export||Import||Trade Volume|
|No||Financial Year||Export Value||Import Value||Trade Value (US$, 000,000)|
|Year||Gross Domestic Product||US dollar exchange||Inflation index (2000=100)|
The following table shows the main economic indicators in 2004–2017.
|GDP in $
|97.56 Bln.||114.34 Bln.||133.29 Bln.||153.24 Bln.||161.87 Bln.||171.49 Bln.||182.87 Bln.||197.08 Bln.||215.42 Bln.||237.35 Bln.||260.92 Bln.||282.19 Bln.||302.57 Bln.||328.71 Bln.|
|GDP per capita in $
|13.6 %||13.6 %||13.1 %||12.0 %||3.6 %||5.1 %||5.3 %||5.6 %||7.3 %||8.4 %||8.0 %||7.0 %||5.9 %||6.7 %|
|3.8 %||10.7 %||26.3 %||30.9 %||11.5 %||2.2 %||8.2 %||2.8 %||2.8 %||5.7 %||5.1 %||10.0 %||6.8 %||5.1 %|
(Percentage of GDP)
|119 %||110 %||90 %||62 %||53 %||55 %||50 %||46 %||41 %||33 %||30 %||34 %||36 %||35 %|
Though foreign investment has been encouraged, it has so far met with only moderate success. This is because foreign investors have been adversely affected by the junta government policies and because of international pressure to boycott the junta government. The United States has placed trade sanctions on Burma. The European Union has placed embargoes on arms, non-humanitarian aid, visa bans on military regime leaders, and limited investment bans. Both the European Union and the US have placed sanctions on grounds of human rights violations in the country. Many nations in Asia, particularly India, Thailand and China have actively traded with Burma. However, on 22 April the EU suspended economic and political sanctions against Burma.
The public sector enterprises remain highly inefficient and also privatisation efforts have stalled. The estimates of Burmese foreign trade are highly ambiguous because of the great volume of black market trading. A major ongoing problem is the failure to achieve monetary and fiscal stability. Due to this, Burma remains a poor country with no improvement of living standards for the majority of the population over the past decade. The main causes for continued sluggish growth are poor government planning, internal unrest, minimal foreign investment and the large trade deficit. One of the recent government initiatives is to utilise Burma's large natural gas deposits. Currently, Burma has attracted investment from Thai, Malaysian, Filipino, Russian, Australian, Indian, and Singaporean companies. Trade with the US amounted to $243.56 million as of February 2013, accounting for 15 projects and just 0.58 per cent of the total, according to government statistics.
The Economist's special report on Burma points to increased economic activity resulting from Burma's political transformation and influx of foreign direct investment from Asian neighbours. Near the Mingaladon Industrial Park, for example, Japanese-owned factories have risen from the "debris" caused by "decades of sanctions and economic mismanagement." Japanese Prime Minister Shinzō Abe has identified Burma as economically attractive market that will help stimulate the Japanese economy. Among its various enterprises, Japan is helping build the Thilawa Port, which is part of the Thilawa Special Economic Zone, and helping fix the electricity supply in Yangon.
Japan is not the largest investor in Myanmar. "Thailand, for instance, the second biggest investor in Myanmar after China, is forging ahead with a bigger version of Thilawa at Dawei, on Myanmar's Tenasserim Coast ... Thai rulers have for centuries been toying with the idea of building a canal across the Kra Isthmus, linking the Gulf of Thailand directly to the Andaman Sea and the Indian Ocean to avoid the journey round peninsular Malaysia through the Strait of Malacca."
Dawei would give Thailand that connection. China, by far the biggest investor in Burma, has focused on constructing oil and gas pipelines that "crisscross the country, starting from a new terminus at Kyaukphyu, just below Sittwe, up to Mandalay and on to the Chinese border town of Ruili and then Kunming, the capital of Yunnan province". This would prevent China from "having to funnel oil from Africa and the Middle East through the bottleneck around Singapore".
According to the CIA World Factbook,
Burma, a resource-rich country, suffers from pervasive government controls, inefficient economic policies, and rural poverty. The junta took steps in the early 1990s to liberalize the economy after decades of failure under the "Burmese Way to Socialism," but those efforts stalled, and some of the liberalization measures were rescinded. Burma does not have monetary or fiscal stability, so the economy suffers from serious macroeconomic imbalances - including inflation, multiple official exchange rates that overvalue the Burmese kyat, and a distorted interest rate regime. Most overseas development assistance ceased after the junta began to suppress the democracy movement in 1988 and subsequently refused to honor the results of the 1990 legislative elections. In response to the government of Burma's attack in May 2003 on Aung San Suu Kyi and her convoy, the US imposed new economic sanctions against Burma - including a ban on imports of Burmese products and a ban on provision of financial services by US persons. A poor investment climate further slowed the inflow of foreign exchange. The most productive sectors will continue to be in extractive industries, especially oil and gas, mining, and timber. Other areas, such as manufacturing and services, are struggling with inadequate infrastructure, unpredictable import/export policies, deteriorating health and education systems, and corruption. A major banking crisis in 2003 shuttered the country's 20 private banks and disrupted the economy. As of December 2005, the largest private banks operate under tight restrictions limiting the private sector's access to formal credit. Official statistics are inaccurate. Published statistics on foreign trade are greatly understated because of the size of the black market and unofficial border trade – often estimated to be as large as the official economy. Burma's trade with Thailand, China, and India is rising. Though the Burmese government has good economic relations with its neighbors, better investment and business climates and an improved political situation are needed to promote foreign investment, exports, and tourism.
Financing Geothermal projects in Myanmar use an estimated break even power cost of 5.3–8.6 U.S cents/kWh or in Myanmar Kyat 53–86K per kWh. This pegs a non-fluctuating $1=1000K, which is a main concern for power project funding. The main drawback with depreciation pressures, in the current FX market. Between June 2012 and October 2015, the Myanmar Kyat depreciated by approximately 35%, from 850 down to 1300 against the US Dollar. Local businesses with foreign denominated loans from abroad suddenly found themselves rushing for a strategy to mitigate currency risks. Myanmar's current lack of available currency hedging solutions presents a real challenge for Geothermal project financing.
The level of international aid to Burma ranks amongst the lowest in the world (and the lowest in the Southeast Asian region)—Burma receives $4 per capita in development assistance, as compared to the average of $42.30 per capita.
In April 2007, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) identified the financial and other restrictions that the military government places on international humanitarian assistance in the Southeast Asian country. The GAO report, entitled "Assistance Programs Constrained in Burma," outlines the specific efforts of the Burmese government to hinder the humanitarian work of international organisations, including by restricting the free movement of international staff within the country. The report notes that the regime has tightened its control over assistance work since former Prime Minister Khin Nyunt was purged in October 2004.
Furthermore, the reports states that the military government passed guidelines in February 2006, which formalised Burma's restrictive policies. According to the report, the guidelines require that programs run by humanitarian groups "enhance and safeguard the national interest" and that international organisations co-ordinate with state agents and select their Burmese staff from government-prepared lists of individuals. United Nations officials have declared these restrictions unacceptable.
The shameful behavior of Burma's military regime in tying the hand of humanitarian organizations is laid out in these pages for all to see, and it must come to an end," said U.S. Representative Tom Lantos (D-CA). "In eastern Burma, where the military regime has burned or otherwise destroyed over 3,000 villages, humanitarian relief has been decimated. At least one million people have fled their homes and many are simply being left to die in the jungle."
US Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) said that the report "underscores the need for democratic change in Burma, whose military regime arbitrarily arrests, tortures, rapes and executes its own people, ruthlessly persecutes ethnic minorities, and bizarrely builds itself a new capital city while failing to address the increasingly urgent challenges of refugee flows, illicit narcotics and human trafficking, and the spread of HIV/AIDS and other communicable diseases."
Electricity - production: 5.961 billion kWh (2006 est.)
Electricity - consumption: 4.298 billion kWh (2006 est.)
Electricity - exports: 0 kWh (2007)
Electricity - imports: 0 kWh (2007)
Agriculture - products: rice, pulses, beans, sesame, groundnuts, sugarcane; hardwood; fish and fish products
Currency: 1 kyat (K) = 100 pyas
Exchange rates: kyats per US dollar - 1,205 (2008 est.), 1,296 (2007), 1,280 (2006), 5.82 (2005), 5.7459 (2004), 6.0764 (2003) note: unofficial exchange rates ranged in 2004 from 815 kyat/US dollar to nearly 970 kyat/US dollar, and by year end 2005, the unofficial exchange rate was 1,075 kyat/US dollar; data shown for 2003-05 are official exchange rates
Foreign Direct Investment In the first nine months of 2012-2013, Myanmar has received investment of USD 794 million. China has biggest of investment commitments for this fiscal.
Foreign Trade Total foreign trade for 2012 was recorded to USD 13.3 billion. It was 27% of Myanmar's GDP.
- "World Bank forecasts for Myanmar, June 2018 (p. 151)" (PDF). World Bank. Retrieved 6 September 2018.
- "Ease of Doing Business: Bangladesh slips a notch in WB ranking". The Daily Star. 1 November 2017. Retrieved 29 December 2017.
- "Burma Unemployment rate". index mundi. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
- "Ease of Doing Business in Myanmar". Doingbusiness.org. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
- "TRADE SITUATION OF MYANMAR IN 2012-2013 FISCAL YEAR TO 2017-2018 FISCAL YEAR (UP TO MARCH MONTHLY)". Ministry of Commerce.
- "NATIONAL TRADE SITUATION OF MYANMAR IN 2011-2012 FICAL YEAR TO 2017-2018 FICAL YEAR (MARCH MONTHLY) (OVERSEA + BORDER)". Myanmar Ministry of Commerce. 2017.
- "TRADE SITUATION OF MYANMAR IN 2012-2013 FISCAL YEAR TO 2017-2018 FISCAL YEAR (UP TO MARCH MONTHLY)". Ministry of Commerce.
- "NATIONAL TRADE SITUATION OF MYANMAR IN 2011-2012 FICAL YEAR TO 2017-2018 FICAL YEAR (MARCH MONTHLY) (OVERSEA + BORDER)". Myanmar Ministry of Commerce. 2017.
- "Burma reveals international debt". Mizzima News. 3 February 2012. Archived from the original on 19 February 2012. Retrieved 19 February 2012. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Upbeat forecast for Myanmar's economy assumes price stability, low inflation". Eleven Myanmar. 31 January 2013. Archived from the original on 5 February 2013. Retrieved 13 October 2013. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "world bank indicator". World Bank.
- Taylor, Robert H. (2009). The State in Myanmar. NUS Press. pp. 38–40. ISBN 978-9971-69-466-1.
- Steinberg, David I. (2001). Burma, the state of Myanmar. Georgetown University Press. pp. 125–127. ISBN 978-0-87840-893-1.
- Goodman, Michael K. (2010). Consuming space: placing consumption in perspective. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 241. ISBN 978-0-7546-7229-6.
- Baten, Jörg (2016). A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. pp. 331–332. ISBN 9781107507180.
- Watkins, Thayer. "Political and Economic History of Myanmar (Burma) Economics". San José State University. Retrieved 8 July 2006.
- Tallentire, Mark (28 September 2007). "The Burma road to ruin". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
- Kate Woodsome. "'Burmese Way to Socialism' Drives Country into Poverty". Archived from the original on 8 December 2012. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "List of Least Developed Countries". UN-OHRLLS. 2005. Archived from the original on 26 October 2013. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Stephen Codrington (2005). Planet geography. Solid Star Press. p. 559. ISBN 0-9579819-3-7.
- "Burma Economy: Population, GDP, Inflation, Business, Trade, FDI, Corruption". Heritage.org. Retrieved 16 January 2018.
- Sean Turnell (29 March 2006). "Burma's Economic Prospects - Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 January 2010. Retrieved 22 January 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Research - CPI - Overview". Transparency.org. Retrieved 16 January 2018.
- Sean Turnell (2 May 2008). "The rape of Burma: where did the wealth go?". The Japan Times.
- Feng Yingqiu (1 August 2011). "Myanmar starts to deal with official forex rate". Xinhua. Retrieved 8 August 2011.
- McCartan, Brian (20 August 2008). "Myanmar exchange scam fleeces UN". Asia Times. Retrieved 8 August 2011.
- "Myanmar Considers Foreign-Exchange Overhaul". Wall Street Journal. 8 August 2011. Retrieved 8 August 2011.
- "High Inflation Impeding Burma's Economy, Says NLD". The Irrawaddy. 30 April 2007. Archived from the original on 16 January 2009. Retrieved 30 April 2007. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Fullbrook, David (4 November 2004). "So long US, hello China, India". Asia Times. Retrieved 14 July 2006.
- Joseph Allchin (20 September 2011). "Taste of democracy sends Burma's fragile economy into freefall". The Independent. Retrieved 25 September 2011.
- JOSEPH ALLCHINJOSEPH (23 September 2011). "Burma tells IMF of economic optimism". DVD. Archived from the original on 26 September 2011. Retrieved 25 September 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- CHATRUDEE THEPARAT (28 August 2011). "Big-shift-to-dawei-predicted". Bangkok Post. Retrieved 27 August 2011.[permanent dead link]
- Thein Linn (15–21 November 2010). "Dawei deep-sea port, SEZ gets green light". Myanmar times. Retrieved 25 September 2011.[permanent dead link]
- Yap, Karl Lester M. (1 March 2012). "ADB Preparing First Myanmar Projects in 25 Years as Thein Opens". Bloomberg. Retrieved 15 March 2012.
- "ADB ends 30-year hiatus in Myanmar". Investvine.com. 28 January 2013. Retrieved 8 February 2013.
- Aung Hla Htun (16 March 2012). "Exclusive: Myanmar drafts new foreign investment rules". Reuters. Retrieved 17 March 2012.
- "Myanmar clears 60% of foreign debt". Investvine.com. 29 January 2013. Retrieved 29 January 2013.
- "Myanmar FDI Expected to Jump 70%". InvestAsian.com. 7 January 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
- Calderon, Justin (30 May 2013). "Myanmar's economy to quadruple by 2030". Inside Investor. Archived from the original on 2 January 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2013.
- "In dirt-poor Myanmar, smartphones are transforming finance". The Economist. 12 October 2017.
- "37% jobless in Myanmar, study finds". Investvine.com. 26 January 2013. Retrieved 27 January 2013.
- Myat Mon (2008). "The Economic Position of Women in Burma". Asian Studies Review. Wiley. 24 (2): 243–255. doi:10.1111/1467-8403.00076.
- "World Marriage Patterns 2000" (PDF). Un.org. Retrieved 16 January 2018.
- Jones, Gavin W. (2007). "Delayed Marriage and Very Low Fertility in Pacific Asia" (PDF). Population and Development Review. The Population Council, Inc. 33 (33): 453–478. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00180.x.[permanent dead link]
- Ba-Thike, Katherine (1997). "Abortion: A Public Health Problem in Myanmar". Reproductive Health Matters. Reproductive Health Matters. 5 (9): 94–100. doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(97)90010-0. JSTOR 3775140.
- "Myanmar to reform investment body". Investvine.com. 5 February 2013. Retrieved 11 February 2013.
- "Burma: Rubies and Religion - Java Films". Javafilms.fr. Retrieved 16 January 2018.
- "On Patrol With Myanmar Rebels Fighting Both the Army and Drug Addiction - VICE News". Vice.com. Retrieved 16 January 2018.
- "Myanmar and IRRI" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 September 2005. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help) (21.2 KB), Facts About Cooperation, International Rice Research Institute. Retrieved on 25 September 2007.
- Calderon, Justin (21 June 2013). "Myanmar rice exports could double by 2020". Inside Investor. Archived from the original on 4 November 2013. Retrieved 21 June 2013.
- "Drugs and Democracy - From Golden Triangle to Rubber Belt?". Tni.org. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
- Brown, Ian (2005). A Colonial Economy In Crisis. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-30580-2.
- "Challenges to Democratization in Burma" (PDF). International IDEA. November 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 July 2006. Retrieved 12 July 2006. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Calderon, Justin (6 June 2013). "Energy: Myanmar's greatest challenge". Inside Investor. Archived from the original on 14 February 2014. Retrieved 6 June 2013.
- Stokke, Kristian; Vakulchuk, Roman and Indra Overland (2018) Myanmar: A Political Economy Analysis. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI). Report commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
- Gelb, S., Calabrese, L. and Tang. X. (2017). Foreign direct investment and economic transformation in Myanmar. London: Supporting Economic Transformation programme
- Aung, Nyan Linn; Phyo, Pyae Thet (6 March 2008). "Government sets new daily minimum wage at K4800". Myanmar Times. Retrieved 9 December 2018.
- Pratruangkrai, Petchanet (17 March 2012). "Six top garment makers fleeing to low-wage Burma". The Nation. Retrieved 17 March 2012.
- Thornton, Phil (12 February 2012). "Myanmar's rising drug trade". Bangkok Post. Retrieved 19 February 2012.
- McCartan, Brian (13 July 2010). "Holes in Thailand's drug fences". Asia Times. Retrieved 19 February 2012.
- Macan-Markar, Marwaan (4 January 2011). "Myanmar's drug 'exports' to China test ties". Asia Times. Retrieved 19 February 2012.
- "MYANMAR: Producing drugs for the region, fuelling addiction at home". IRIN. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. 25 June 2010. Retrieved 19 February 2012.
- Kurlantzick, Joshua (16 February 2012). "Myanmar's Drug Problem". Asia Unbound. Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 19 February 2012. Retrieved 19 February 2012. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Sun Wyler, Liana (21 August 2008). "Burma and Transnational Crime" (PDF). CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service.
- Chin, Ko-lin; Sheldon X. Zhang (April 2007). "The Chinese Connection: Cross-border Drug Trafficking between Myanmar and China" (PDF). U.S. Department of Justice: 98. Cite journal requires
- Chin, Ko-lin (2009). The Golden Triangle: inside Southeast Asia's drug trade. Cornell University Press. pp. 239–240. ISBN 978-0-8014-7521-4.
- Lyman, Michael D.; Gary W. Potter (14 October 2010). Drugs in Society: Causes, Concepts and Control. Elsevier. ISBN 978-1-4377-4450-7.
"Oil and Gas in Myanmar". Total S.A. Archived from the original on 12 December 2003. Retrieved 20 January 2009. Cite uses deprecated parameter
Ye Lwin (21 July 2008). "Oil and gas ranks second largest FDI at $3.24 billion". The Myanmar Times. Archived from the original on 4 January 2010. Retrieved 20 January 2009. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Myanmar opens bids for 18 oil blocks". Investvine.com. 23 January 2013. Retrieved 24 January 2013.
- Vakulchuk, Roman; Kyaw Kyaw Hlaing; Edward Ziwa Naing; Indra Overland; Beni Suryadi and Sanjayan Velautham (2017). Myanmar’s Attractiveness for Investment in the Energy Sector. A Comparative International Perspective. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and Myanmar Institute of Strategic and International Studies (MISIS) Report.
- Gems of Burma and their Environmental Impact Archived 26 May 2010 at the Wayback Machine
- "CBC - Gem dealers push to ban Burmese rubies after bloody crackdown". Cbc.ca. Retrieved 16 January 2018.
- "Reuters, Move over, blood diamonds". Features.us.reuters.com. Archived from the original on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 16 January 2018. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Richard Hughes. "Burma Embargo & the Gem Trade". Ruby-sapphire.com. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
- "Myanmar's Jade Millionaires Fuel Property Surge: Southeast Asia". The Jakarta Globe. Archived from the original on 7 October 2012. Retrieved 3 March 2015. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Mining block permits issued in Myanmar". Investvine.com. 20 February 2013. Retrieved 20 February 2013.
- Henderson, Joan C. "The Politics of Tourism in Myanmar" (PDF). Nanyang Technological University. Retrieved 17 October 2008.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 29 July 2013. Retrieved 25 July 2013. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|dead-url=(help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 21 June 2011. Retrieved 28 June 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|dead-url=(help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- Henderson, Joan C. "The Politics of Tourism in Myanmar" (PDF). Nanyang Technological University. Retrieved 8 July 2006.
- "Tayzathuria". Tayzathuria.org.uk. Archived from the original on 30 April 2011. Retrieved 3 March 2015. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- The Tourism Campaign - Campaigns - The Burma Campaign UK Archived 29 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- World Bank Group. Myanmar Economic Monitor May 2018
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 13 October 2008. Retrieved 25 October 2008. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|dead-url=(help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects". Retrieved 27 August 2018.
- Calderon, Justin (24 April 2013). "End of EU sanctions augurs Myanmar rush". Inside Investor. Retrieved 29 April 2013.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 27 December 2006. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|dead-url=(help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- Calderon, Justin (29 April 2013). "US to boost Myanmar trade, investment". Inside Investor. Retrieved 29 April 2013.
- "Geopolitical consequences: Rite of passage". The Economist. 25 May 2013. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- "The World Factbook". Cia.gov. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
- DuByne, David (November 2015), "How Myanmar can Hedge Foreign Loans for Geothermal Projects to Mitigate Kyat Devaluation Risks" (PDF), OilSeedCrops.org
- Wade, Francis (2 March 2011). "UK to become top donor to Burma". Democratic Voice of Burma. Archived from the original on 27 September 2011. Retrieved 8 August 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Burma". Refugees International. Retrieved 8 August 2011.
- "Australia's aid to Burma—Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)". AusAid. Government of Australia. 30 June 2011. Archived from the original on 17 November 2011. Retrieved 8 August 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Myanmar's rulers implement increasingly restrictive regulations for aid-giving agencies". International Herald Tribune. 19 April 2007.
- "Latest FDI in Myanmar close to $800m". Investvine.com. 12 February 2013. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
- Myanmar Business Today; Print Edition, 5 November 2015. Geothermal Energy in Myanmar, Securing Electricity for Eastern Border Development, by David DuByne & Hishamuddin Koh
- Myanmar Business Today; Print Edition, 19 June 2014. Myanmar’s Institutional Infrastructure Constraints and How to Fill the Gaps, by David DuByne & Hishamuddin Koh
- Myanmar Business Today; Print Edition, 27 February 2014. A Roadmap to Building Myanmar into the Food Basket of Asia, by David DuByne & Hishamuddin Koh
- Taipei American Chamber of Commerce; Topics Magazine, Analysis, November 2012. Myanmar: Southeast Asia's Last Frontier for Investment, by David DuByne
- Taiwan ASEAN Studies Center; ASEAN Outlook Magazine, May 2013. Myanmar’s Overlooked Industry Opportunities and Investment Climate, by David DuByne
- Google Earth Map of oil and gas infrastructure in Myanmar
- Myanmar Ministry of Commerce (MMC) News, information, journals, magazines related to Burmese business and commerce
- Myanmar-US Chamber of Commerce
- Union of Myanmar Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry (UMFCCI) 
- World Bank Summary Trade Statistics Myanmar