Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kiribati
 | Micronesia: Kiribati Project‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Based on a search of Wikipedia's articles related to Kiribati, I've found some articles that I believe are about places in Kiribati, and could usefully have geographical coordinates added.
The articles in question are listed in Category:Kiribati articles missing geocoordinate data. At the time of writing, some examples included:
At the time of posting this notice, there were 22 articles in this category needing geographical coordinates.
Why add coordinates? edit
By adding coordinates, a Wikipedia reader can easily view the location on a street map, nautical chart, topographic map, by satellite photo, realtime weather map, and in many other ways. Coordinate data makes an article eventually appear in various services such as Google Maps' Wikipedia overlay, Google Earth, and Wikipedia's own internal map service. Coordinate data also helps readers looking for geographically-based data, such as locations near a reference point, or related information.
How can I do it? edit
The articles are all marked with {{coord missing}} tags, which need to be replaced with {{coord}} tags that contain the location's latitude/longitude coordinates; or you might be able to add coordinates to an existing infobox. You can find out how to do this at the Wikipedia:Geocoding how-to for WikiProject members.
Please let me know if this is useful, or if I can help in any way. -- The Anome (talk) 22:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Coordinators' working group edit
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:19, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
Proposal for a 200-WikiProject contest edit
A proposal has been posted for a contest between all 200 country WikiProjects. We're looking for judges, coordinators, ideas, and feedback.
The Transhumanist 00:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
WP 1.0 bot announcement edit
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:30, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced living people articles bot edit
User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles (BLPs) related to your project. There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.
The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>>Wikipedia:WikiProject Kiribati/Unreferenced BLPs<<<
If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.
Thank you. Okip 02:48, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Kiribati articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release edit
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Kiribati articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:13, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject cleanup listing edit
I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 21:05, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Island article updates edit
I'm working my way North to South, updating and cleaning up articles and adding references; so far I have revised Makin, Butaritari, Marakei and Abaiang. Which brings me to the hardest one of all, Tarawa. I believe that the Tarawa article should be mainly about the geography of Tarawa and its lagoon; most of the history, economic and cultural aspects are quite distinct between South Tarawa and North Tarawa (an article that doesn't exist yet, but I think the right thing to do is create it). I hope this doesn't appear to others as a sweeping change, and of course I will confer or revert if anyone disagrees. Thanks, --Obkiribati1 (talk) 09:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles within Category:LGBT in Oceania may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Comment on the WikiProject X proposal edit
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject X is live! edit
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject edit
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
Background edit
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you. — The Transhumanist 07:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
RfC on election/referendum naming format edit
An RfC on moving the year from the end to the start of article titles (e.g. South African general election, 2019 to 2019 South African general election) has been reopened for further comment, including on whether a bot could be used move the articles if it closed in favour of the change: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Proposed change to election/referendum naming format. Cheers, Number 57 15:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
A new newsletter directory is out! edit
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
- – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:Kiribati edit
Portal:Kiribati, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Kiribati and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Kiribati during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool edit
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
I-Kiribati or Gilbertese. A Demonym not well understood edit
“I-Kiribati” means in the Gilbertese language, a people from Kiribati 🇰🇮. This is not an adjective or a qualifier. To say a French guy, you say I-Buranti; a Japanese woman, I-Tiaban; a New Zealander, I-Niutian… and so. But because some people may think that I-Kiribati could also have other uses. To tell the truth, we shouldn’t adopt in English forms that have their own grammar and use. We cannot write I-Kiribatis (plural) because -s is not the mark of plurality in Gilbertese. Today I have discovered the Category “I-Kiribati law”… a complete non-sense. In the same case, why should an old men who died in 1944, be placed in the category « I-Kiribati people », a complete anachronism. Kiribati word started to be written in European languages publications not before 50s. Some clean up has to be done, if you all agree on the topic.-Arorae (talk) 14:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:KI" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:KI. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:KI until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources edit
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Informal requested move 14 October 2022 edit
Wikipedia:WikiProject Kiribati/member → Template:User WikiProject Kiribati – default namespace, as per naming convention — currently a redirect. So {{User WikiProject Kiribati}} instead of {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Kiribati/member}}, basically, keeping the redirect. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 06:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request. Comments left there (permalink) are copied below. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 23:44, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Est. 2021: Template:User WP Kiribati is another related WikiProject template to which it redirected for a long time until a retargeting by you. So, I'm not willing to support the move as it gets confusing. In my opinion, it should be retargeted to its original target. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 12:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @CX Zoom: The redidect had no transclusion back when I uncontroversially retargeted it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Kiribati/member, an already-existing userbox made by the project itself. The people now using it instead of Template:User WP Kiribati clearly preferred this layout. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 17:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Fair thing, but I'm still wary of the suggestion that two this closely named templates have different userboxes. Although I do not oppose any move request you make, I'd suggest discussing it at the WikiProject talk page, if there is no opposition, of which I don't expect any because of its semi-active status, feel free to go ahead. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 22:34, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @CX Zoom: The redidect had no transclusion back when I uncontroversially retargeted it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Kiribati/member, an already-existing userbox made by the project itself. The people now using it instead of Template:User WP Kiribati clearly preferred this layout. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 17:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Est. 2021: Template:User WP Kiribati is another related WikiProject template to which it redirected for a long time until a retargeting by you. So, I'm not willing to support the move as it gets confusing. In my opinion, it should be retargeted to its original target. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 12:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
End of comments copied from WP:RMT. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 23:44, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon edit
Hello WikiProject Kiribati:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 13:15, 21 September 2023 (UTC)