Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/May 1

Latest comment: 7 days ago by Linhart.stephen
Today's featured article for May 1, 2025
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 1, 2025
Picture of the day for May 1, 2025

The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen.

In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines.

Expanded membership of the European Untion
Expanded membership of the European Untion

Shouldn't May Day maybe come first? It's a lot more international in scope.--Pharos 23:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I fully agree. --Soman 21:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
May Day a.k.a. Labour Day or International Workers Day is the most prominent worldwide event of the day. This should come first. Linhart.stephen (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yom HaShoah (2008) in Israel

(begins at sunset the previous day). It needs to be moved to May 1 as the Israeli government advanced it one day this year due to it's adjacency to the Jewish Sabbath.[1] (it doesn't say the reason for it at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but they, and everywhere else, mark the day this year as the 26th of Nisan, sunset April 30-May 1). Thanks, Valley2city 16:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Marriage of Figaro edit

Please remove the File:Marriage of Figaro.ogg (an arrangement for winds) and replace it with File:Overture low.ogg (a proper chamber orchestra). -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

2012 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 07:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

2013 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 16:13, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

2014 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 06:43, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Birthday of Ali ibn abi taleb edit

Hello @Howcheng:, this year (2015), the birthday of Ali which is of a great importance for both shia and sunni muslims, coincides with the 1 of May, based on this link. Please consider that his birthday is not based on Georgian calendar it changes from year to year. How can we include it here in "on this day"? Mhhossein (talk) 12:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Mhhossein:: First of all, the article is currently ineligible to be listed due to the {{external links}} template at the bottom. Secondly, it is already listed on WP:Selected anniversaries/January 27. As the rules state, an article may only be featured once per year, so if we were to include the article on his birthday annually, we would have to remove it from the other day. Which is fine, and I don't mind doing that, as long as you understand how this works. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 07:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

2015 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 03:07, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

2016 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 08:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Howcheng, references have now been added for the 1 May date regarding the Norman invasion of Ireland. ~Asarlaí 18:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

2017 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 07:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

International Workers' Day edit

Shouldn't International Workers' Day be mentioned maybe? There are three holidays or festivals in specific countries mentioned, but International Workers' Day is observed all over the world and an official public holiday in most of the world! (see the little map in the article!). On top of that the Loyalty Day mentioned in the USA that is included is, according to its article, only some ploy to prevent International Workers' Day from being celebrated. It isn't a holiday and doesn't seem to have any widespread traditions associated with it. --83.128.131.207 (talk) 09:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, I already figured out what happened. --83.128.131.207 (talk) 10:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
I have removed the refimprove tag that was added yesterday (problematic timing) from the article and added the entry to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/May 1, as I found ~75 refs to be sufficient—please use inline tags for any specific issues. As mentioned, Loyalty Day has just as many issues, including but not limited to: CN in the lead section, a ref with Missing or empty |title= (help), as well as a section without any citations whatsoever. El_C 11:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
In the past year, the consensus has been to begin ensuring that articles featured in OTD are of high quality. We have taken out a number of high-profile holidays/observances, including Mother's Day, Father's Day, and a number of major religious holidays including Passover and Easter. Nobody is targeting International Worker's Day specifically. @El C: Two of the faults that you mentioned ({{cn}} tag in the lead and the malformed reference) are not enough to disqualify the article from appearing. The section that you identify has having no references does in fact have a reference to the law itself as an external link instead of footnote. However, one could make the argument that because Loyalty Day was created specifically in opposition to Int'l Workers Day, it doesn't make sense to include it if the thing it opposes also omitted, so I'm fine with taking that out. howcheng {chat} 16:39, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

2018 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 05:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

2019 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 17:56, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Asian Pacific American Heritage Month edit

@Howcheng: Should Asian Pacific American Heritage Month be mentioned on this date?--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 02:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

@RightCowLeftCoast: I don't think it's good enough quality. The Introduction to Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage section is clearly a straight copy-paste from a National Park Service web site (someone just pasted in the HTML). howcheng {chat} 02:35, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Gotcha.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 02:39, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

2020 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 18:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

2021 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 07:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

2022 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 07:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply