Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2011/September

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting‎ | Proposals‎ | Archive‎ | 2011

Proposals, September 2011

{{jazz-festival-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Portuguese castle stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:45, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

support - its tag, {{Portugal-castle-stub}}, has 166 transclusions. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:42, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Agathoclea (talk) 19:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{Germany-festival-stub}} and Category:German festival stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Seems very appropriate.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:17, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Support a subcat for this, too - a quick scan finds 118 stubs in an oversized parent stub category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:43, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:02, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Support Agathoclea (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Comment Film or music? Does it make a difference? Lugnuts (talk) 13:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German building and structure stubs by state

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
As we have templates for half of Germany's sixteen states, and categories for seven of those eight, it seems worthwhile to look at the other eight states. CatScan searches on articles already stub-tagged and other small articles gives the following results:

I propose templates for them all, and categories if they exceed 60 threshold. SeveroTC 06:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Support I can also try to ensure the others get over 60.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:27, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

There's quite a few undercategorized articles here: I've just been going through Category:German sports venue stubs and found over 100 with no location category so I wouldn't be surprised if we have a similar situation for other building types. SeveroTC 13:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:03, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Support Agathoclea (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Portuguese history stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Portugal-hist-stub}} - (see sample), feeding into Category:Portuguese history stubs. I count 60 in the first 100 at Portugal-stubs, so more than 100, I bet close to 150 - Nabla (talk) 01:09, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Support both - finding 60 is plenty for a category, and a high likelyhood of ever reaching this threshhold is plenty for a tag. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:03, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Queensland geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category has 833 entries. I propose the creation of Category: Queensland airport stubs which has 50 articles tagged as stubs, Category:Queensland river stubs which currently has 46 rivers and 10 creeks tagged as stubs and at least 35 river articles remaining to be created, Category:Queensland dam stubs which would have 26 dams, 2 weirs and 9 lakes tagged with a stub template as well as with many weir articles remaining to created and finally islands Category:Queensland island stubs which has 52 islands and 2 islets currently marked as stubs. This would reduce the Category:Queensland geography stubs by one quarter. - Shiftchange (talk) 04:12, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Support, even though some of these are sligghtly undersized. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm a bit late here, but is it not better to divide based upon Category:Regions of Queensland? SeveroTC 07:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

South Korean railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose Category:South Korean railway station stubs/{{SouthKorea-railstation-stub}} - a quick scan finds 480 stubs here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Support Agathoclea (talk) 18:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Dinosaur stubs split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I thjink that maybe we should create an Category:Ornithischian stubs category, populated mostly by upmerged templates for the major groups of Ornithischian dinosaurs - {{ceratopsian-stub}} has 28, {{pachycephalosaur-stub}} has 9, {{ornithopod-stub}} has 56, {{ankylosaur-stub}} has 23, and {{stegosaur-stub}} has 11, which brings us up to 127.We could also create an {{ornithischian-stub}}, to catch the other 19 (bring the stub articles up to a total of 146.

Additionally (or in stead), we could create an Category:Dinosaur ichnogenus stubs/{{dinosaur-ichnogenus-stub}}, to handle all the 97 stubs about dinosaur trace fossils. (while we currently don't have an {{ichnogenus-stub}}, we could have one of those, too.)

Any opinions about either or both of these proposals? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:20, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Support either. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Temnospondyl stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:Prehistoric amphibian stubs is getting big - has already passed 400 pages. Category:Temnospondyl stubs/{{temnospondyl-stub}} should catch 118 of these. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Iranian airports

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose {{Iran-airport-stub}} (49 stubs) as an upmerged tag - looks like soon we may need a category here, but not quite yet. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:28, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Chinese provincial templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Lost count of how many times I added one of these to an article and seen them red linked. China is a massive country and perfectly reasonable to have templates on provinces and their buildings. If needs be a stub count can be done and I can try to make each province viable for separate structure categories too.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


Support all, as needed. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Support Agathoclea (talk) 18:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German building and structure stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
There is undersorting in Category:German railway station stubs and prior to sorting, the following seem worthwhile (with estimates on usage based on current transclusions of asbox and categories iff 60):

Of these, all except Brandenburg and Lower Saxony have structure stub categories. There should be enough here for new Brandenburg and Lower Saxony categories:

SeveroTC 06:56, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Support Agathoclea (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:United States biography book stubs / {{US-bio-book-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
There are over 100 articles on books about people from the U.S., and Category:Biography book stubs is 5+ pages (814 articles). The permcat is subdivided by nationality, subject, or occupation, and I think nationality is the most clear-cut way to break up the stubs as well. Pegship (talk) 23:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Not opposed. I'd wait to hear other opinions before building. Just make sure it's clear how this is to be used. The way you've stated this, the subject of the biography is/was a US citizen/denizen. Author's or publisher's country does not matter. (For instance, a biography of Queen Elizabeth written by an American would not count, while a biography of George Washington written by a German would) Dawynn (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
    • Point well taken, thanks. Pegship (talk) 22:45, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Support, as per Dawynn. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New Russian geography stub categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. Last of my catch-up geography requests (for now).

Dawynn (talk) 18:23, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Support Agathoclea (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New subcategories for Category:American journalist, 20th century birth stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Dawynn (talk) 15:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New sports categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request:

Dawynn (talk) 14:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

As discussed quite recently, the USSR one would make Category:Soviet sport stubs very undersized. It may be worth deleted Category:Soviet sport stubs, upmerging it to Category:Soviet Union stubs and creating Category:Soviet football competition stubs. SeveroTC 06:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
How would it be undersized? Category:Soviet sport stubs would still be a parent category for Category:Soviet sportspeople stubs and Category:Soviet football competition stubs. Parent categories with valid child(ren) categories are not undersized. Dawynn (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Not everyone agrees there - most people don't worry so much about a strict 60 threshold, but this split would reduce Category:Soviet sport stubs to around 10 articles, which is, in my opinion, too small when there is only a single subcat. SeveroTC 11:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
But, on the other hand, I think we can get Category:Soviet sport stubs up to something respectable anyway. SeveroTC 12:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
There's now 22 articles tagged with {{USSR-sport-stub}} which I think is just about enough with two subcats. The permcat is Category:Defunct football competitions in the Soviet Union, by the way. SeveroTC 16:09, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

National Register of Historic Places in New York

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request:

Dawynn (talk) 12:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

United States geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request:

Dawynn (talk) 12:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Chinese geography stub categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request.

Dawynn (talk) 11:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I notice none of the existing categories includes "province". Dawynn (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Support Agathoclea (talk) 18:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Zoology Stub Categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request:

Dawynn (talk) 09:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Newspaper stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Change of pace. More speedy requests:

Dawynn (talk) 02:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Azerbaijan geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request:

Dawynn (talk) 02:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

===Slovakian geography categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request.

Dawynn (talk) 02:12, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indian geography categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request for new India categories:

Dawynn (talk) 12:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Support Agathoclea (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Scattered geography categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request:

Dawynn (talk) 11:57, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

A few changes made as I was createing these categories. Needed to keep consistent with existing categories. Dawynn (talk) 20:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Russian rail (transport) stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I just noticed thatr Russia has no stub category or template in the Category:Asia rail stubs/Category:Europe rail stubs stub trees. I propose these as a speedy, once an SfD discussion about the names is resolved. Note that this should have 83 stubs, excluding Category:Russian railway station stubs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:18, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Support but don't forget about Category:Russian rapid transit stubs which would also be a subcat and would take the main category down to 70. SeveroTC 07:29, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Northern Thailand geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request:

Dawynn (talk) 13:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:12, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Germany geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was request tabled because of upcoming potential changes.

Speedy request.

Dawynn (talk) 13:23, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:12, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
My original source was unreliable. I have crossed off those that do not have sufficient article counts yet. Dawynn (talk) 18:41, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment. I support this in principle, but suggest that we wait. Several German regions will be redefining/reorganising their districts in the next few months - including several of the ones listed above in less than two months time. May be worth waiting rather than having to do this twice - cf. the recent Mecklenburg-Vorpommern changes. This page has a lot of the details of what WP:G is coping with - unfortunately a lot of it is in German, so I'm not sure how far-ranging some of the changes are. Grutness...wha? 01:06, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Slovenia geography stub categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request.

Dawynn (talk) 13:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:12, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Vietnamese geography categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following should be speediable. Should we include "Province" in the name? None of the current Vietnamese Province categories do:

Dawynn (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Support as they are now, I think. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ski mountaineers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A {{Skimountaineering-bio-stub}} would pick up 132 articles already tagged with something and so qualify for Category:Ski mountaineering biography stubs. SeveroTC 10:23, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Agathoclea (talk) 19:03, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Labrisomidae stubs/Template:labrisomidae-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose this stub type to help reduce the size of Category:Perciformes stubs, which has over 4 pages. A scan shows 138 stubs here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Support. Dawynn (talk) 02:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New hotel categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create Africa, do not create others.
The following should be speediable:

Dawynn (talk) 16:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Looks like my sources were not accurate. The African category has enough for a category, but the other two do not have sufficient articles. Dawynn (talk) 18:20, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New play stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following should be speediable:

Dawynn (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Windsurfing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose a {{windsurfing-bio-stub}} thgat would take around 35 articles (30 already tagged with something) and a {{windsurfing-stub}} that would take around 15 articles, upmerged to Category:Water sports biography stubs and Category:Water sports stubs respectively. A Category:Windsurfing stubs looks a little off for the moment, but iff 60... SeveroTC 14:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Television stubs ready for de-upmerging

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Speediable, anything thoughts? SeveroTC 21:08, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Looks fine to me. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:10, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Support. Just one question, what's the rule for program vs. programme in non-English speaking countries? Dawynn (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure how it works in all countries but Philippines (as per recent discussion at CfD about Transport/Transportation in the Philippines) uses US English and for European countries we use Br English. SeveroTC 06:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Arthropod stubs split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following split of arthropods:

Article counts are based on what is currently tagged with {{arthropod-stub}}. More articles may exist. Dawynn (talk) 13:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:46, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Mayfly stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposal. To pick up {{mayfly-stub}}. 65 articles. Dawynn (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Canadian Anglican bishop stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Template: {{Canada-Anglican-bishop-stub}}. Not sure on count here, because I'm having trouble finding a perm cat. However, there seemed to be a lot of these as I went through Category:Canadian Christian clergy stubs. Willing to build template first, and save category until at least 60 found. Dawynn (talk) 12:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Support - ISTR making some similar suggestion when the Canadian clergy stuff came up at SFD. Grutness...wha? 01:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
That was for {{Canada-bishop-stub}} (and, I assume, Category:Canadian bishop stubs). I'd be willing to create that as a parent, if I hear support. However, we already have an RC bishop category. We should have enough Anglican bishops for a full category. I would estimate only a dozen or so other Canadaian bishops currently tagged. Dawynn (talk) 11:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Prehistoric ray-finned fish stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following {{paleo-rayfinned-fish-stub}}/Category:Prehistoric ray-finned fish stubs - this should have 190 stubs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:06, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Support Dawynn (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Template:Philippines-airport-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose an upmerged {{Philippines-airport-stub}} stub tag - upmerged into Category:Philippines building and structure stubs, Category:Asian airport stubs and the soon-to-be-created Philippines transport(ation) stubs - there are already 39 stubs for this tag. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Support. Dawynn (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Changes to Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The German region of M-V has been reorganised into new districts as of the beginning of this month - this will require a reorganisation of the stubs, with the 18 old districts now combined into eight new districts. Looks like one or two will remain very similar (Rostock is still Rostock, Schwerin is still Schwerin, and Nordwestmecklenberg is still there, too), though even then the boundaries may have altered. We will at the very least need five new templates, and almost certainly five new categories, and can slowly change the current stub types over to them:

Grutness...wha? 00:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Make that {{MecklenburgischeSeenplatte-geo-stub}} please. Most of the changes are pretty straightforward (complete districts merging into a new district), except Category:Demmin geography stubs, which will have to be divided over Category:Mecklenburgische Seenplatte (district) geography stubs and Category:Vorpommern-Greifswald geography stubs. I think this applies to 10-15 articles, I can do that manually once the categories and the templates have been created. Note that currently some of the district-specific stub templates categorize into the state category Category:Mecklenburg-Vorpommern geography stubs. If you need more info, let me know. Markussep Talk 08:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Oopos - yes, missed an "e" - thanks for spotting that. If it's a simple case of whole districts moving to new names, we can simply redirect the old templates to the new ones, so it should be a fairly simple task. Grutness...wha? 01:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:08, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
An estimate of how populous the new categories will be:
What's the procedure here, is it OK to create the templates already, and let them point to the main category for the time being? Markussep Talk 16:22, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
I think these are pretty uncontroversial changes, so we might as well go ahead and make them. All the categories are going to be well past the threshold of 60 stubs as well. I'll start making the new templates/categories and once that's done propose deletion of the old ones at SFD. I'm also making a redirect at {{RostockDistrict-geo-stub}}, since the term "Landkreis" isn't used in the English WP article name. Grutness...wha? 01:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
What about the remaining upmerged templates - {{Neubrandenburg-geo-stub}}, {{Greifswald-geo-stub}}, and {{Stralsund-geo-stub}}? Where do they go - or do they stay in the main stub category? Grutness...wha? 07:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Ah - don't worry - I checked the articles and see that Neubrandenburg is in Mecklenburgische Seenplatte, Griefswald is (not surprisingly) in Vorpommern-Greifswald, and Stralsund is in Vorpommern-Rügen. Grutness...wha? 07:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
correct! Markussep Talk 07:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
:) OK, the new templates and categories are all made - now it's simply a case of tidying up Demmim and seeing whether many (or any) of the ones left in the main category should have the more precise district/city stub templates. The articles should slowly transfer over to the new category (depending on the length of the server queues etc)... then once the old categories are empty they can go to WP:SFD. Grutness...wha? 07:49, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! I've emptied Category:Demmin geography stubs, and {{Demmin-geo-stub}} is unused now. It looks like most of the articles in Category:Mecklenburg-Vorpommern geography stubs now are lakes (there are many in MV ;-)), I'll go through the other articles. Markussep Talk 09:25, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
True - and annoyingly a lot of them simply say "a lake in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern" (which I'm finally learning to spell without looking it up ;) some of them are fairly clear as to which district(s) they're in, though, so it'll still cut down a little. I'm surprised just how few of the stubs are in the two cities. Grutness...wha? 00:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

National/continental transport(ation) stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I think we should have continent- and country-level transport stub tags, as well as categories where there are at least 60 stubs (named either "transport" or "transportation", based on the national trnasport(ation) permcat name). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

This was on my mental to-do list so I support (with all stub tags at -transport- and categories based on the permcats). There's a lot of things categorised by county below which would bring them all together. SeveroTC 19:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
I'd suggest, for the sake of consistency, that the template is at -transport- in each case, but with redirects at -transportation- for all of them. That way, no matter which term an editor is more used to, they'll be able to find the template. Grutness...wha? 00:08, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

The category for the Philippines should probably wait until the permcat's CfR discussion is closed. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:02, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tidy up of Category:Rugby union biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
we already have three continental categories fed by some nation templates, a bunch of national categories and another bunch of nationality templates for continents without enough bios for a category, I suggest with a likely upswing in numbers (2011 rugby world cup due to start) it might be an idea to add templates for all countries that have competed in the final;

and continent wide templates where we have a category;

any opinions. Waacstats (talk) 18:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Support (from a place that seems even more rugby crazy than normal) Grutness...wha? 00:41, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:British conductor (music) stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose Category:British conductor (music) stubs, - to pick up 72 stubs tagged with {{UK-conductor-stub}}. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2 more baseball bios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
the following are both viable

any objections to speedy? Waacstats (talk) 22:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Support - none here. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Lizard stubs split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Even after the recent {{paleo-lizard-stub}} split, there are still over 3 pages of Category:Lizard stubs. I propose the following split:

How's that? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2011/September&oldid=1077709957"