| Norway pages by quality | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | |||||||
| Total | |||||||
 FA
|
22 | ||||||
| FL
|
21 | ||||||
 A
|
2 | ||||||
 GA
|
278 | ||||||
| B | 644 | ||||||
| C | 1,512 | ||||||
| Start | 9,411 | ||||||
| Stub | 28,769 | ||||||
| List | 972 | ||||||
| Category | 9,626 | ||||||
| Disambig | 205 | ||||||
| File | 903 | ||||||
| Portal | 15 | ||||||
| Project | 53 | ||||||
| Redirect | 1,105 | ||||||
| Template | 1,093 | ||||||
| NA | 3 | ||||||
| Assessed | 54,634 | ||||||
| Unassessed | 16 | ||||||
| Total | 54,650 | ||||||
| WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 228,213 | Ω = 5.62 | |||||
Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Norway! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Norway related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Norway}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Norway articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questionsEdit
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of WikiProject Norway is free to add or change the rating of an article.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
InstructionsEdit
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Norway}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Norway|class=???}}
| The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria): | ||
| FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Norway articles) | FA |
|
| FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Norway articles) | FL |
|
| A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Norway articles) | A |
|
| GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Norway articles) | GA |
|
| B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Norway articles) | B | |
| C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Norway articles) | C | |
| Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Norway articles) | Start | |
| Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Norway articles) | Stub | |
| List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Norway articles) | List | |
| For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter: | ||
| Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Norway articles) | Category | |
| Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Norway articles) | Disambig | |
| Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Norway articles) | Draft | |
| File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Norway articles) | File | |
| Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Norway articles) | Portal | |
| Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Norway articles) | Project | |
| Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Norway articles) | Redirect | |
| Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Norway articles) | Template | |
| NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Norway articles) | NA | |
| ??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Norway articles) | ??? | |
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Quality scaleEdit
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Battle of Svolder |
| FL |
The article has attained featured list status. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
| A |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Norse mythology |
| GA |
The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
The article meets the good article criteria:
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Bjørnøya |
| B | The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
The article meets the six B-Class criteria:
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Bergen |
| C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
| Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Steinerud (station) |
| Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues. More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; however, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Stjernen I (As of July 2007) |
| List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of bridges in Norway by length |
| Category | Any category falls under this class. | Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. | Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. | Category:Bridges in Norway |
| Disambig | Any disambiguation page falls under this class. | The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. | Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. | Dovre (disambiguation) |
| Template | Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. | Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. | Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. | Template:Flytoget |
| NA | Any non-article page that fits no other classification. | The page contains no article content. | Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. | Portal:Norway |
Requesting an assessmentEdit
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to edit and list it below.
- Skiringssal: I'm sure this is no longer a stub; I'd like to improve it further but have limited access to sources and have not learned to read Norwegian, other than very slowly with the help of online grammars and dictionaries. Cheers. Nortonius (talk) 14:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've completely translated and expanded the article for the NTNU University Museum and would love a new rating! AndersLeo (talk) 14:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Assessment logEdit
| Norway articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
 | This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record. |
May 21, 2022Edit
ReassessedEdit
- Henning Throne-Holst (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Johan Throne Holst (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Norway–Sweden border (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Norway–Sweden relations (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- Gitarkameratene (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
RemovedEdit
- File:Fast S&T logo.png (talk) removed.
May 20, 2022Edit
ReassessedEdit
- Bjørn Ihler (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Kirsten Flagstad (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- Anita Nergaard (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
May 19, 2022Edit
ReassessedEdit
- Melodi Grand Prix 2022 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- Buddy (electric car) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Kewet (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Norwegian people of Jamaican descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Lom, Norway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Savnet siden mandag (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Think City (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
RemovedEdit
- Category:People from Lom (talk) removed.
May 18, 2022Edit
AssessedEdit
- Alfred Larsen (sailor) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Andreas Holm (politician) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Ivar Svendsen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Svalbardbutikken (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
RemovedEdit
- Alfred Larsen (talk) removed.
- Andreas Holm (talk) removed.
- Republicans Abroad Norway (talk) removed.
May 17, 2022Edit
ReassessedEdit
- Flags of Norwegian counties (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- Category:Newspaper people by newspaper in Norway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Norway women's national under-17 football team (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
May 16, 2022Edit
ReassessedEdit
- Trygve Lie (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- Coffin Cheaters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Karoline Brændjord (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Agder (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Bergen in health professions (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Giske (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Indre Fosen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Innlandet (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Oslo in health professions (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Skodje (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Troms og Finnmark (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Vestfold og Telemark (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Vestland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Vestnes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Vigmostad (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Viken (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:People from Ørskog (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Sophie Roman Haug (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople by county in Norway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Agder (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Innlandet (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Kongsvinger (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Kristiansund (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Møre og Romsdal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Nordland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Porsgrunn (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Rogaland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Troms og Finnmark (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Trøndelag (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Tønsberg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Vestfold og Telemark (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Vestland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Viken (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Veps (band) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
May 15, 2022Edit
RenamedEdit
- Alan Walker (music producer) renamed to Alan Walker.
ReassessedEdit
- 2013 Norwegian Sámi parliamentary election (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Edgar Antonsen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Lena Tyriberget (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Norway women's national under-19 volleyball team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Norway women's national volleyball team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Østfold Hospital Trust (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- 2017 Norwegian Sámi parliamentary election (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Alan Walker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Australian people of Norwegian descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
- Einar Lurås Oftebro (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)