Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 October 28

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< October 27 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 29 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 28

edit

01:46:59, 28 October 2020 review of submission by Forwardus1969

edit

A submission by me, User Forwardus1969, was followed by a notification: "Submission rejected on 26 October 2020 by Dan arndt (talk). The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined". My inquiry is about reasons for the rejection, as approver Dan arndt has not left any note or comment of it. The article that I wrote was modeled on many similar stub articles already existing in the Russian version of Wikipedia. I truly appreciate the time that approver Dan arndt took to review the article, yet I'm curious what exactly triggered the rejection.

Sincerely Oleg Yurchenko, MSc. Evanston, IL USA

Forwardus1969 (talk) 01:46, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Forwardus1969: I assume the article was rejected because it's not written in English, and you submitted it for review at the English Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:28:54, 28 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by MOST REV DR SUNNY ALAPPAT

edit


Request to publish Article on Most Rev Dr Sunny Alappat — Preceding unsigned comment added by MOST REV DR SUNNY ALAPPAT (talk • contribs)

MOST REV DR SUNNY ALAPPAT (talk) 06:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

edit


Category:Metropolitan Archbishops Category:Ecumencial Catholic of Christ in India

06:58:05, 28 October 2020 review of submission by Jain94075

edit

My name is arpit jain I was born on 3 August 2005... I study in class 10 in Vandana International School

Jain94075 (talk) 06:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jain94075. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Unlike social media websites such as Facebook, it is not a place to write about yourself, other than a small relevant amount on your user page. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07:00:49, 28 October 2020 review of submission by VikramReddy143

edit


VikramReddy143 (talk) 07:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:30:05, 28 October 2020 review of draft by Matthewzilch

edit


Hello, I submitted a draft for review on the 18th September. I have had no response yet to as weather it has been approved. Is there anyway of finding out if this is going to be reviewed soon?

Matthewzilch (talk) 10:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthewzilch: The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed since 18 September. Other drafts have been in the pool since 23 July. So you can anticipate a review within about two months of now. You are welcome to continue improving the draft while you wait, or to work on other articles. If you aren't sure where to start, there are many ways to help at the Wikipedia:Task Center. --Worldbruce (talk) 11:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:49:45, 28 October 2020 review of submission by Wera-Selenowa

edit


Dear Wikipedia review team,

Thank you for reviewing this article about the book ‘Satyendra Pakhalé Culture of Creation’. It is a seminal design book at the time of Corona virus published by nai010 Publishers Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Please see links of the book below: • https://www.nai010.com/nl/publicaties/satyendra-pakhale/245779 • https://www.artbook.com/9789462085145.html • https://www.amazon.co.uk/Satyendra-Pakhale-Creation-Juhani-Pallasmaa/dp/9462085145

It is the outcome of three years’ labour of love, with contributions from a number of prominent design thinkers such as Juhani Pallasmaa, Paola Antonelli, René Spitz, Aric Chen, Jacques Barsac, Tiziana Proietti and Stefano Marzano, who delve deeply into wide range of topics, such as the culture of making, social modernity, social cohesion, poetic analogy, perception and atmosphere, in the book. The book sheds a new light on ‘sensorial design’ resulting in social cohesion. It aims to initiate a new debate about design and its plurality and diversity in the contemporary cultural context.

Though at the time of its writing, the Covid-19 crisis hadn’t yet unfolded, it seems this book takes on a more significant relevance now with the current world crisis. It subtly challenges the current assumptions and belief system that are taken for granted and hardly ever questioned including traditionalism, individualism and more.

Now the COVID-19 pandemic has changed our world as we knew it, exposing faults in our society, a new book explores the role of design in fostering the common good, uniting us all in today’s divided world. Thank you for reviewing this page, I look forward to see this article about this seminal publication ‘Culture of Creation’ published on Wikipedia. I remain, Wera


Wera-Selenowa (talk) 11:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence of WP:NBOOK would be? Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Your post here, having an identical tone to the article, only damns the draft and your chances of continuing to edit here. What is your connexion to the author or publisher? —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 19:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:14:41, 28 October 2020 review of draft by Robert Hercules

edit


Robert Hercules (talk) 14:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon. The page I submitted on Callan Method was rejected because it was deemed to be too advertorial. I am eager to keep it balanced and would appreciate more specific feedback on the areas that are causimg the problem. I will take immediate steps to remove or amend the sections in question. Thank you for your help.

14:18:34, 28 October 2020 review of draft by Click0987

edit


Hi,

I just wondered if I need to remove more from my article than I have alreday for it to be approved. Draft:Chums (company) Thanks user (talk) 14:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also asked at Teahouse. David notMD (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yust a note, @Click0987: you may want to check out named references. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:28:51, 28 October 2020 review of submission by Javed3367

edit


Javed3367 (talk) 14:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Upon first view, this does look like a WP:PROMO case, though I have definitely seen worse. The Introduction section needs a rewrite. If you are affilated with this company in anyway, please check WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the required disclosures. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:11:35, 28 October 2020 review of submission by Brotato The Great

edit

I don't understand why my article isn't notable. Why is Onefootball notable but not Fotmob? Brotato The Great (talk) 16:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Brotato The Great: Let me ask you a parallel question: Why is John Lennon notable, whereas my uncle, a popular local plumber is not? It boils down to press/publishing coverage. My uncle never attracted the attention of The Guardian or a biographer contracted by Random House. In order for an article to survive here, you need to demonstrate that a subject has received signficant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. So this means that major mainstream sources need to write about the subject in detail, and it must be an independent coverage, meaning that interviews don't count, press releases don't count, an entity announcing a partnership with the article subject doesn't count. (I don't think that raw datasheets like what you find at Crunchbase typically count toward notability either.)
Also, it's possible that Onefootball does not meet our notability guidelines. The existence of an article at Wikipedia doesn't mean that the subject is de facto notable. A lot of articles get created that don't always get scrutinised by the community. A better way to gauge quality would be to look for sample articles in our Good Article or Featured Article collections. These typically get a great deal of community attention. Hope that helps. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Cyphoidbomb: So what should I do to improve my draft? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brotato The Great (talk • contribs) 19:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Brotato The Great: Simply, you need to find sources that speak in great detail about this company, and add those references to the article. If no quality sources exist, then perhaps it's too early for the article to exist. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:45:13, 28 October 2020 review of submission by 112.198.11.115

edit


112.198.11.115 (talk) 16:45, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't ask a question. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:40:30, 28 October 2020 review of submission by 70.54.104.165

edit


70.54.104.165 (talk) 19:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't ask a question. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:45, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:47:20, 28 October 2020 review of submission by Volleyball enthusiast

edit

Hi! How come other player's submission was accepted and this one was rejected on the basis of notability? One such example of an account is Mohan Ukkrapandian What has to be done to be notable?

Volleyball enthusiast (talk) 19:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(1) We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. You need sources for every claim the article makes. (2) Mohan Ukkrapandian never went through Articles for Creation (drafting was not made mandatory until early 2018). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 19:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

=

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_October_28&oldid=986797433"