Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 15

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 14
June 16 >

June 15 edit

Template:DB-ICE stations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A few transclusions left. Replace with the relevant Module:Adjacent stations module call with {{stl}}. Gonnym (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused s-line templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused s-line templates. --Gonnym (talk) 21:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Powderfinger Collab edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

contents entirely inside of <noinclude>...</noinclude>. should be moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Powderfinger/Collab and marked historical. Frietjes (talk) 18:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No need to move or mark historical. This is a defunct project for something that doesn't seem to have ever really gone anywhere. Gonnym (talk) 20:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sydney NYE TV presenter line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused outside of one user's sandbox Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete. Also Template:Sydney NYE soundtrack line for the same reasons. Gonnym (talk) 20:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
added. Frietjes (talk) 22:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:As-shukuru edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused in article-space Frietjes (talk) 16:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frietjes, you can go ahead with the deletion. I actually created it for learning purpose.I am grateful for the concern. Hope to learn more from you. Young Lecturer (talk) 09:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cape Sōya weatherbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

single-use template, should be merged with the parent article Frietjes (talk) 16:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Postchronicle edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

looks like this was last used back in March 2008 and not being used anymore. not really a cleanup template, so depending on the issue, either {{spam link}} or {{redacted}}? Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete It looks like the uses are talk pages that included a link to the site before it was spam-blacklisted, so neither of those really quite fit. On the other hand this is a purely static template that will never have any more uses, so there's no reason to keep it as a template rather than substing. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Phoenician and Greek alphabets edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use content template. Suggest subst and delete. Izno (talk) 04:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Salian dynasty edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sidebar used only on 3 pages and apparently with potential only for 5. WP:NENAN. Izno (talk) 03:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:U.S. Congress committee assignments edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An infobox-like template that has clearly not caught on in nearly 10 years since existence with only 4 pages currently using the template. I expect in most cases these are being presented as part of the general biography of each politician or could be such, and as such I'd recommend removing the sidebarish and then substing/deleting. Izno (talk) 02:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indian Army Corps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template is insufficiently complex to need a template separate from Template:Military unit sidebar. I've already made it a passthrough to indicate how simple it is. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 02:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US Corps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template is insufficiently complex to need a template separate from Template:Military unit sidebar. I've already made it a passthrough to indicate how simple it is. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 02:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US Armor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template is insufficiently complex to need a template separate from Template:Military unit sidebar. I've already made it a passthrough to indicate how simple it is. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 02:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox/Impeachment process edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remains unused after a couple of weeks left for opportunity for use. Also uses the wrong name and parameters do not match en.wp's {{infobox}} template. Izno (talk) 01:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New Zealand voting method referendum, 2011 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now single-use template after I merged the child article content into the parent. The rationale for not using the standard template here doesn't hold merit for me, as multi-choice is explicitly supported (if perhaps with less content). Suggest subst and deletion. Izno (talk) 01:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom. I would still support subst/delete even if this were an ad-hoc table as it originally were, as purely static content with no possibility for more uses, but I acknowledge that's a fringe position. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Stagecraft ToDo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently unused for anything but a demonstration on a talk page. Izno (talk) 00:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_15&oldid=1161483085"