Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 July 26

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 25
July 27 >

July 26 edit

Template:Unicode chart/PDFs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. This may belong as part of a documentation page or could be moved to a WikiProject subpage if it is useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and merge into Unicode or WikiProject subpage per nom. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 20:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unichar/errorcheck/general category and sibling subpages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2020. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Template parameter usage/templatename-normalised and siblings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2020. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table by article quality/legend article quality edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This appears to be code that was superseded by something better. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of Marvel Civil War Comics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or meaningful template parameters. Looks like article content. Created in 2008. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because the general reference at the bottom of the table is a link to another wiki hosting user-submitted content. I don't know if the policies were more lax in 2008, but this would not be acceptable in an article today. Rjjiii (talk) 01:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, we apparently already voted to delete this per WP:OR here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel Comic's Civil War reading list
A user converted the article to be deleted into a template and inserted it into another article [1] where it was removed again per WP:OR.[2] Rjjiii (talk) 02:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Link to page and redirects edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Possibly useful and might be salvageable, but without documentation, it is difficult to tell. Created in 2010. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox periodic table group/category format edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2017. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HBWQ2016OG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:49, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Results table used in three articles about a 2016 sporting event. Contains no template parameters. Since the results will not change, subst into the three articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HBQ2016OG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Results table used in two articles about a 2016 sporting event. Contains no template parameters. Since the results will not change, subst into the two articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HasMaps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No documentation or categories or incoming links from discussions. The only mention and use of this template is from a 2014 Signpost article. Based on the lack of other incoming links, it is unclear whether this template was actually used. The link in the Signpost article results in a 404 error. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A copy of the Commons template c:Template:HasMaps, which was heavily used on index pages on Commons like c:Commons:British Library/Mechanical Curator collection/Synoptic index, UK and Ireland to document which books from the BL 'Mechanical Curator' upload of 1 million images to Flickr contained maps.
When filled out, the template could be used to link to all the map images on Flickr from the particular book.
Unfortunately, Flickr seems to have broken its "machine tags" search urls, so a bit of work will be needed to mend the template. Annoyingly the Flickr change has also broken the links used to navigate between the pages on Flickr, eg from a map image like this to other images or other maps from the same book. This is really annoying, given the work people put in to do that tagging!
I have only just found out about this breakage. With luck, it may be possible to find a way to restore these searches and make the template work again. But it will need some experimentation.
As for the en-wiki copy of the template, it is currently only used on Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-10-29/Maps tagathon. It was quite a big project -- we went through a million images and found all the maps -- so I would quite like to leave the Signpost page as it was, as part of the documenting of what was done. But I suppose one could replace the template with a link, if the template really offends you. Jheald (talk) 22:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have pinged a Twitter thread to the people at Flickr who now are meant to be dealing with GLAMs and big cultural uploads, and they say they'll file a ticket based on the report. But there may have been problems for a while, and I'm not sure the management have been rushing to fix them, so it may be a while before the template, even on Commons, can produce a link that actually works again (ie returns a Flickr search for all the images tagged as maps from a particular book).
But, as others say, more a problem for Commons than here, where the template has only been used once, in the Signpost article. Jheald (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jheald the template can always be subst into the Signpost page so you can still have the link there. Gonnym (talk) 05:27, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If we go that way, as easy just to make a link. (Probably also worth leaving an invisible comment to say how the original text has been modified, and a visible note that as of 2023-07-27 the linked search is not working). Jheald (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:H:pron-en edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2009. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Copyrightexaminationrejected edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undocumented template used on a few talk pages in 2005 and then forgotten. Time to subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parisstreetcat2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:50, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assigns a category to articles, contrary to WP:TEMPLATECAT. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lenin Prize Icon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A simple File: invocation with no template parameters. No transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cvt2m edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:52, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created in 2018. Just one transclusion used as a demonstration in a talk page. This template invokes a module named for editor RexxS which is marked "Lua functions for personal use". – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Michelin green star edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links explaining what this template is or why it exists. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013–14 AHL Eastern Conference standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No other AHL season uses a template and the information is easily contained in a table on the main page –uncleben85 (talk) 19:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013–14 AHL Western Conference standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No other AHL season uses a template and the information is easily contained in a table on the main page –uncleben85 (talk) 19:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spectral lines of the elements edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst into article and delete. It may be useful to keep and move the /row template, which makes table formatting easier. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ship/special edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2018. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ship/doc/fixed prefix: documentation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This appears to be old or abandoned documentation of some sort. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RGBtoHSV.HSV edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except in one editor's sandbox page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table legend/Category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These were all test pages or marked as deprecated. I replaced all existing usages with the recommended new parameter value in order to use the updated template in any affected pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95: What is the updated tempate you're referring to? Is it {{Periodic table legend}}? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Look at the documentation for the template at the top of the list. It explains that |theme=Category (or similar) should be replaced with |theme=block, which I have done. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table by article quality/legend article importance edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. This appears to be abandoned code from 2013 that was replaced by something better. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table by article quality/2013-12-31 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. If this is wanted for WikiProject history, it should be moved to project space. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move to project space. YBG (talk) 19:57, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox periodic table group/periodic table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2017. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table (32 columns, micro)/headercell edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in late 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table (32 columns, compact)/tool edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just one transclusion in a template that is listed for deletion. No documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nuclide/overview edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in mid-2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table/blind1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2018. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table/black-and-white/32-column edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2018 and 2020. Possibly an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table/ptg-blind-zh-char/extend-categories edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table/talk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2020. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of currency symbols/row/checks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of oxidation states of the elements/datacheck edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 August 2. Izno (talk) 17:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 15924/overview-4id/checks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in February 2021. If this is useful, it should probably be incorporated into template documentation or moved to a WikiProject subpage.– Jonesey95 (talk) 16:57, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 15924/overview-4id-relations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or template code. Created in February 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 15924/overview-Latn in Unicode edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This page was previously TFD'd in December 2021 and for some reason moved, but it's still not a template or used as part of a documentation page. It should probably be incorporated into template documentation or moved to a WikiProject subpage. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IPA vowels audio/unit test edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. It only meaningful contents are a template that is likely to be deleted soon. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/symbol-to-simple-substance/overview edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is either an abandoned template page from mid-2022 or it should be moved to a WikiProject page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/var edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cathead sailing yachts built in edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused category template. Gonnym (talk) 14:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Newark Penn Station Platform Layout edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and contrary to multiple consensuses that platform layout templates should not be used, e.g. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Platform layouts, again: June 2023. Thryduulf (talk) 09:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1971 Quebec provincial by-elections/Chambly edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. ✗plicit 14:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Canada election template. Gonnym (talk) 08:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This template was accidentally removed from a mainspace page as the result of a page move. This has now been corrected (and it's included on two mainspace pages). CJCurrie (talk) 19:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Withdraw nomination. Gonnym (talk) 19:57, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2023 WAC–ASUN Challenge football standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. If this should be used, feel free to transclude it in the correct location. Gonnym (talk) 08:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the UAC template is used instead.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 08:54, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2023 Western Athletic Conference football standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. If this should be used, feel free to transclude it in the correct location. Gonnym (talk) 08:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The UAC template is used instead.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 08:54, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2023 Super Rugby standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as Template:2023 Super Rugby Pacific standings is the one used. Gonnym (talk) 08:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2018 Vitality Blast North Division edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as 2018 T20 Blast#North Group uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 08:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused latest software release templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete all except Template:Latest stable software release/cairo, which is in use. ✗plicit 06:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above are all unused software release version templates. See also previous TfDs from 2023 March 3 and 2022 July 10. --Gonnym (talk) 08:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Isotopes table/2019 update NUBASE2016 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table legend/Predicted edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2013. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table (metals and nonmetals) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2012. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete regardless.-WP:NOTATEXTBOOK.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 08:59, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periodic table (irregular symbols) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete regardless.-WP:NOTATEXTBOOK.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 08:59, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of hieroglyphs/gardiner-TOC/row edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Letters with acute edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content; all of these are used in just one article. Subst each into their corresponding article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No objection, I suspect that the reason was to have a consistent style and independent protection option. But single use templates can't really be justified.
[How] does this interact with {{letters with diacritic}}? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 07:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That template is unused. Gonnym (talk) 07:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did not nominate {{letters with diacritic}} because it has at least one subpage that is used in articles. I left it for a separate nomination. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge into corresponding articles per nom. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 18:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unicode navigation/colors edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused subpage. Either delete, or subst into the template's documentation page if it is useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unicode name aliases correction edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links from discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unicode chart Specials edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 August 2. Izno (talk) 16:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unicode blocks/overview edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The documentation subpage says that this is not a template, and that it is not intended for transclusion. This should either be deleted or moved to a WikiProject space. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unicode chart edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 August 2. ✗plicit 06:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox isotope/mass number edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Created in early 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox rail line/tracking edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overly complex subtemplate no longer needed after this edit. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox rail line/routemap demo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. This appears to be an abandoned experiment from 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox rail line/doc/parameter list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. If this is useful, it should be substed into the template's documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:07, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox punctuation mark/top edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. Created in early 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:07, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox German railway vehicle/Parameter translation (locomotives) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This appears to be an abandoned experiment from 2017. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Script/doc/list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. Abandoned documentation attempt by a now-indefinitely-banned editor. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/symbol-to-etymology--overview and related edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except within this self-contained set of templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom. Gonnym (talk) 09:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Comic strip reference edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 04:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Comic strip reference with Template:Cite comic.
There has been discussion about merging these two templates for years. Comic strip reference is used on less than 50 articles. I've synced both templates so that they currently accept the same parameters and output the same reference. Using the "strip" parameter (a required parameter of comic strip reference that is used in all of its citations) in {{Cite comic}} will generate the same newspaper-type formatting. Comic strip reference usages can now all be redirected to the more widely used and maintained template. Feel free to ask questions, Rjjiii (talk) 02:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rjjiii both templates have very long doc pages so I can't quickly find what changes. Can you provide an example of an old version citation and a new one after the merge is completed? Gonnym (talk) 19:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you mean by "changes". As I said, both templates accept the same parameters and output the same reference. Here is an example for the documentation page:
Using template:comic strip reference:
Using template:cite comic:
Let me know if you have more questions, Rjjiii (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym: Forgot to ping. There's no change in the reference input or output. Rjjiii (talk) 01:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! So there really isn't anything to merge here as they already do both. Then I agree, redirect one to the other. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PT group table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2018. Used only in each other. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/symbol-to--overview-pymol edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This template page's subpage may be in use; it could be substed or moved. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/symbol-to--overview-isotopes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except within this set of templates. Created in 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/symbol-to-category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions outside of User space. Created in 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/symbol-from-pagename edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/2023 taskforce isobox reuse/what-is-this edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/CAS number edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 04:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/periodic table/var edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 04:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A set of templates with no transclusions except within one another. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/isotopes stable edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 04:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marked as deprecated in March 2023. Time to delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/random-element edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 04:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in January 2023. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_July_26&oldid=1168483009"