Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 12

April 12 edit

Template:Sidebar 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar and redundant to Template:Campaignbox Russo-Ukrainian War and Template:Campaignbox 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Especially the latter as it already covers the entire war with virtually the same amount of links to the related articles. Adding this sidebar would add more template/sidebar clutter on articles. Not to mention the main infobox Template:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine infobox already takes a sizable amount on the main article for the conflict and transcluded on template space for obvious reasons. And three sidebars are already on the main article. More are not needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was a draft for an RfC that has not been seen through so it can be deleted. It's of course substantially different from the campaignboxes in that it covers more than just battles and offensives, but as it has been decided the articles are only using the navbox and an campaignbox instead of a sidebar. Phiarc (talk) 15:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chinese Time:Number edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete for all but Ctime:03 for which there is no consensus to delete, but feel free to renominate it if you still feel it should be deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Chinese time templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Some of these are transcluded in a user page. Is the nominator suggesting that those templates be substed and then deleted? – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, outright deletion. Transcluding in userspace is not really seen as beneficial unless it is part of the user subpage of the creator. That is if the userpage is a work in progress or for testing grounds. But these don't provide any benefit. None of these used on any articles which is what other Chinese Time templates are for the most part. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 in Sri Lanka edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A rare group of templates covering topics about events in Sri Lanka for a certain year. At the moment, the 2022 template has fewer than five links related to events for the year in the country. But for all of them, the same rationale applies. The respective year in country categories is a better way to group the related articles. We don't need navboxes for every year for events in a country. This falls into template creep. And most of the articles linked in the navboxes are already in other navboxes better suited to the article topic. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, I don't see any similar templates for any other countries in the region. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Year films cat row edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused category row list templates. Was removed back on April 2 of this year due to duplicating category content. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Those templates duplicated the category entries listed in the same category. Very pointless and requires maintaining a parallel list. Gonnym (talk) 08:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:National anthems of Belarus (sidebar) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete , appears to have been replaced by Template:National anthems of Belarus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar template with only three articles that are Belarus national anthem related. The bottom three articles are Belarus-related. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Warner Bros. Discovery evolution edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information about Warner Bros. Discovery's history is covered better on the articles it is used on, WarnerMedia and Discovery, Inc.. This sidebar is redundant in presenting the subject at hand. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:13, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it's kinda pointless to have. RedMastersHD (talk) 00:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Disney evolution edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of The Walt Disney Company already covers the history of the Disney company in detail and better serves what this sidebar is trying to do. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with the nom here. This template will either be huge or like it is now, a selective list based on the editor's preference. Both options are bad. The timeline article should handle this kind of list. Gonnym (talk) 20:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although it was probably created in response to this template, which is probably also not useful if some of the details on that particular could similarly be retooled into a timeline page made for Paramount Global events since it was formed in 1952 / 1971, the specific template seems to be similar to Disney’s own timeline page, and with the example linked previously here, it could be used for someone to write a timeline page for other media companies that have enough events to warrant such a page to be created or written. Paramount1106 (talk) 04:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Diplomatic missions of the Maldives edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No links other than one redirect and to Japanese Wikipedia articles for the diplomatic offices. Can't aid on Wikipedia. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Burmese alphabet edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, filled with redirects to the main topic, and mainly stylish rather than fulfilling any navigational purpose. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Ankara Metro left/M1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and phased out S-line template for Module:Adjacent stations/Ankara Metro. Was supposed to be deleted back on April 2, but merging the nominations into one mass bundle, it got lost. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Probably also speedy-able. Gonnym (talk) 20:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northamptonshire districts map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 07:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused maps. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Võrumaa-cat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 07:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed after it was being transcluded wrongfully in category space and all links are being served better by Template:Võrumaa. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Categories don't really need navigation templates like this. Just go up one level the category tree and you will find them anyways. Removes the need to maintain two parallel navigation schemes. Gonnym (talk) 09:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIS Freestyle Junior World Ski Championships edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 07:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one valid link in the navbox. Fails navigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIS Snowboarding Junior World Championships edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 07:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with only one valid blue link outside of the title of the navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too early for a navbox with only 2 links. Gonnym (talk) 09:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ZZM color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 07:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Zhengzhou Metro. Gonnym (talk) 06:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Austin John Winkler edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge, but feel free to renominate for deletion or further merger discussion Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Austin John Winkler with Template:Hinder.
Too much duplicated content from the {{Hinder}} navbox. Articles directly relating to Austin John Winkler can be merged into a related articles section in that navbox. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 08:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not merge but remove entries that don't belong. I haven't checked the articles but in general, anything that belongs to Hinder should not be in Template:Austin John Winkler and anything that has nothing to do with Hinder and is only related to Austin John Winkler should not be in Template:Hinder. Also, the entire "Related articles" section should not be in the navbox. If after this, either template does not have enough links then the template should be deleted. Gonnym (talk) 12:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Cleaned up the Winkler one. Could still merge the solo EP, but if delete is better option, so be it. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 14:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ÜrümqiM stations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Ürümqi Metro Frietjes (talk) 18:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WuxiM color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Wuxi Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Xi'an Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Xiamen Metro, and Module:Adjacent stations/Xuzhou Metro. Gonnym (talk) 20:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).