Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 26

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 25 November 27 >

November 26 edit

Template:Official languages of U.S. states and territories edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use table which we can easily merge with the parent article Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This used to also be referenced from Languages of the United States which is a fine place to include the information. It was removed here without comment. There was some discussion mentioning the template long before its removal. -- ke4roh (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
keep. I put the table back in Languages of the United States. -- ke4roh (talk) 19:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Substitute this as being content for articles. This is not appropriate use of template space. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suppose one article could refer to the other for the table, but I would hate to see the information duplicated in both places. -- ke4roh (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Now that this table is being used in more than one article, keeping it as a template will allow the table to be updated on each article by updating the template, rather than having to manually update the table on each article, which would be more tedious and could also lead to inconsistencies at times. --Zander251 (talk) 01:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, used in more than one article. Erinius (talk) 08:58, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as per Zander251 & Erinius BSMIsEditing (talk) 18:09, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Singaporean name edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Grundorf modules edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused {{Adjacent stations}} modules and no obvious place to use them. Mackensen (talk) 21:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Category scope edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Had only one transclusion at Category:Sport by region which I've replaced with a {{Hatnote}} call. Gonnym (talk) 11:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cleanup taxobox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note - the template is currently used on four pages, and has the {{transclusionless}} template added. --awkwafaba (📥) 15:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the template is occasionally used to flag problems in taxoboxes. Not used frequently, but certainly not unused. YorkshireExpat (talk) 21:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Template category may be empty most of the time, but is still required to notify taxobox editors of articles needing attention. Loopy30 (talk) 01:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep since it's been used as of now. It is relevant. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Constituencies of Corse-du-Sud edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only has two links and fails WP:NENAN anyway Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:52, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Archive top yellow/old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused __ Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: History merged. I am interested in opinions on what to do with the template now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the history has been merged. Gonnym (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cfr3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Year in country category/old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in use. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be histmerged with Template:Year in country category instead of deleted. Fram (talk) 08:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I've taken care of the hist merge and would like opinions on what to do with the template now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the history has been merged. Gonnym (talk) 11:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hungary squad 1958 World Men's Handball Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:License change edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_26&oldid=1058613980"