Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 27
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Template is orphaned and exactly the same as Template:Political corruption sidebar. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unused and not required. Nigej (talk) 16:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I can't think of a situation where it would be preferable to not include the concepts. If the issue is with length, then make the regions collapsible. --Xurizuri (talk) 06:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 21:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Unnecessary template, redundant to {{Infobox officeholder}}. ... discospinster talk 17:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Not unnecessary as it focuses in on a Thai police officer, not just a officeholder in general (this message is posted by Thaipolice) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thaipolice (talk • contribs) 17:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: What is unique about Thai police officers that they need a separate template? We don't have separate templates for police officers from other countries. ... discospinster talk 18:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The fact that this was copied from Template:Infobox officeholder, inclusing the TfD tag, is telling. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per above and pending some better explanation of why it is necessary. Nigej (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Math-citation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused citation template that is basically superceded by either of the generic CS1/CS2 templates of interest. Izno (talk) 06:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as author of template. It was created on request but was never needed. Thanks, Izno, for finding this template and tfd-ing it. - CRGreathouse (t | c) 15:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. As the template itself says, anyone using it should seriously consider using other citation templates. --Xurizuri (talk) 06:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused; results are presented in a better formatted table at 2005 Argentine legislative election. Yilku1 (talk) 02:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unused and never will be used. Nigej (talk) 10:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).