Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 29

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 28 December 30 >

December 29 edit

Template:Saturn Award for Best New Media Superhero Series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @86.10.25.197 with the reason "Navbox with only two links so not enough" FASTILY 21:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The reality is that if it has 10 links it should be deleted. If you're in The Punisher (TV series) and want to see what other series won the award you'll click on the link in the Accolades section and go to the parent article. Finding the navbox is quite difficult you have to click "show" twice to get the list of other film. A typical example of a navbox that purely decorative, to be added to an awards section, of no use for navigation. Nigej (talk) 21:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom 86.10.25.197 (talk) 09:28, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:VSB station edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused train templates. Gonnym (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Decoration edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, undocumented template. Seems to refer to "decorations" as in awards. User:GKFXtalk 13:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:08, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment if the specified image is anything to go by, this was copied from Italian Wikipedia -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HOLtotal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in one talk page, which can be replaced with {{HOL|total}} or subst or commented out. Gonnym (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The original nomination was for {{HOLtotal}}. I have added all of its child templates, since they are used only in this template and will be orphaned if Template:HOLtotal is deleted. See explanatory comment below by Farolif, the creator of these templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, it looks like that should be all of the single-value templates from the old format. Farolif (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all HOL is maintained while these aren't. So they need deleting in case someone might use them. Nigej (talk) 14:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Officeholder table/shortname edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused subpage of Template:Officeholder table. Gonnym (talk) 11:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 15:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PLANETNAME edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template that inexplicably translates month names to planet names, so {{PLANETNAME|July}} returns Uranus. Also accepts numerical input. I suspect that it's a test page as it's basically a copy of {{MONTHNAME}}, including its documentation, with some words changed. User:GKFXtalk 11:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The conversion of numbers to planet names is potentially useful, but we've managed without it and this template is not the most suitable should it ever be required. Best to start again if it's ever required. Nigej (talk) 14:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete if this is supposed to be an astrology template, then the association between the planet and the month is wrong -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country showdata/mirror edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one version and it is not used. Q28 (talk) 00:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I think this is used e.g. to sync a sandbox with the main template. Personally I write {{subst:msgnw:../}} if I want to do this, which is actually easier than writing {{subst:country showdata/mirror}}. (Ordinary copying and pasting also works.) No need for a template to help with the process. User:GKFXtalk 11:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brick chart/Blocks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links AFAICT. Appears to be an abandoned, experimental fork of {{Brick chart/Bricks}}, which is used and continues to be updated. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Can be used by adding the undocumented style=Blocks parameter in {{Brick chart}}. However, the output looked incorrect so suggest deleting. Nigej (talk) 07:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indian club football edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated, hasn't been edited since 2014. Any relevant content is now contained at Template:Football in India. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 04:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Replace with {{Football in India}} per nom. Nigej (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Redirect Outright delete or redirect to the main template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment this is a very odd template, it uses a subnavbox for no reason, that contains all the content -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 14:24, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Ahhh, yes, one of my earliest creations... should be kept and preserved in a museum! Nah, but really, delete this... delete it now Anakin. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 16:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australian Senators/adv and sibling political party color subpages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These background color templates were removed from their parent template after this talk page discussion. Their use probably violated some part of MOS, since color was being used on its own to identify party affiliation, so I don't think they can be used again. If colors are needed to label political parties, the new, comprehensive Module:Political party should probably be used instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. It appears I created two of them, but have no recollection and they now appear unnecessary. --Scott Davis Talk 06:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. WP has moved on and these are now redundant. Moondyne (talk) 07:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Afd-merge from multi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. No evidence that it was ever substed in its current form. This template was last edited in 2014, and the potential need for it appears to be handled by {{Afd-merged-from}} or possibly {{Article history}}, so it should be safe to delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 15:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AfC-c/col edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. I found no evidence that this template or its redirect are used by on any pages on en.WP. The hex colors in this template are hard-coded into {{AfC-c}}, where this template may have been used in the past. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adoption notice expired for bots edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. I found no evidence that this template in its current form has been substed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2004 Summer Olympics men's field hockey game A2 and siblings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These templates either have zero transclusions or one transclusion. These templates' content exists (or could exist after substing) as a single, populated {{Fieldhockeybox}} template, along with dozens of others, at Field hockey at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament, so they do not need their own dedicated template pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FormerFT edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:57, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. Functionality has been added to Template:Featuredtopictalk and is working fine (see Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Devil May Cry titles). – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fos2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deprecated template is marked "keep as historical", but there are no longer any transclusions or incoming links, so it can safely be deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IDsign edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links. Only edits were in March 2020. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. Converts 2 0 -3 into  2  0  3 which I suppose is potentially useful. Nigej (talk) 15:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment documentation aded per Nigej -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment it looks like a stock ticker symbol -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:High Speed 3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, and no link to a main article, possibly because this railway line is barely even an idea. See High Speed 3 (a redirect). – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unbuilt railways can be subject to significant changes so definitive-looking routemaps seem unlikely to be useful. User:GKFXtalk 11:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HMSouthSydneyRabbitohsLadder and similar rugby standings templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The articles that these standings templates may have been used in should have simply contained them as tables, and the articles appear to have been PRODded or otherwise deleted, so the tables are no longer useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all as unused. Abandoned mid-season it seems. Nigej (talk) 08:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HOL ineligible edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Template content is a single two-digit number. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • creator's comment: Also look into deleting Template:HOLtotal and all of its input templates. They've been replaced by Template:HOL wherever needed. Thanks. Farolif (talk) 00:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for that. I have nominated those templates for deletion above. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete See discussion above. Nigej (talk) 14:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hatching edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Empty template with nice documentation, but no transclusions and no incoming links. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hashemite-Jordan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. If it was ever used, it appears that the navboxes {{Jordanian princes}} and {{Kings of Jordan}} are preferred today. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_29&oldid=1063983709"