Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 June 25

< June 24	June 26 >

June 25 edit

Template:2018–19 Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2018–19 Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2019–20 Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2020–21 Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not needed per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 22:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:56, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 12:57, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rail Head edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rail Head (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Currently unused, seems not very useful anymore. TheImaCow (talk) 09:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Radiolist start edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Radiolist start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Currently unused, seems not very useful (anymore). TheImaCow (talk) 09:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Race and intelligence reminder to editors edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Race and intelligence reminder to editors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused message from 2010. TheImaCow (talk) 08:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:QuadrantsIMAGE edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 12:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QuadrantsIMAGE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Currently unused, seems not very useful (anymore) TheImaCow (talk) 08:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:QCUP2013ladder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 12:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QCUP2013ladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, "work in progress" since 8 years. TheImaCow (talk) 08:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Protection template redirects edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 12:30, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pp-disputed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Pp-semi-vandal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Pp-semi-v (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Pp-risk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Pprotected (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Pp-vandalism-semi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Protected-blocked (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:ProtectBU (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Protect2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Protected page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Protected2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Protectedpage (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Protectedtemplate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Protection2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All ot them are cuttently unused, and, since everyone uses Twinkle to add Protection-Templates, they'll probably stay unused. (notice: all of them were created in 2006-8) TheImaCow (talk) 06:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It is complicated enough here without this array of similarly intended and unused templates. Better to delete and, if really required at some future date (unlikely given things have become more systematised since their creation), they can be recreated. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ship builder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ship builder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a procedural renomination of this template following no actual discussion of this template at the previous deletion discussion, which focused mainly on {{ship event row}}. The nomination was based on the template being unused and convoluted, the former being not true and the latter potentially contended by the original nominator. Primefac (talk) 20:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I didn't say it was unused. I thought it was unused unless it was also used with ship event row. If that is not the case, then this template can be kept as it was not the template causing issues. Mjroots (talk) 04:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 23:45, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SNOW Keep until unused. Currently this template is used extensively in nine list articles, see its What Links Here page. To avoid disrupting them, they need to be migrated away from it before deletion can be sensibly considered. The deletion discussion notice is already polluting every dam' entry in every dam' list and must be removed ASAP. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 06:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- You clearly should clearly read and, more importantly, understand the essay you linked to and the process here at TfD. --Gonnym (talk) 09:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete The backend is really complicated, but in the end there's no reason to use a template for a few simple wikilnks and a flag image. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete I'm inclined to agree with Pppery. I don't see any reason why we should distribute what is just simple text and links in a dozen different pages. --Trialpears (talk) 16:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).