Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 December 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 22 December 24 >

December 23 edit

Template:Black Sheep (rock band) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just a copy/paste from Black Sheep (rock band)#Albums. Serves no purpose as a template. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No navigational purpose. Nigej (talk) 21:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Unused and I see no place it would be used, other than the page where it was copied from. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No mainspace transclusions. –Novem Linguae (talk) 08:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: clearly created in the wrong place and doesn't serve as a template – information already contained in the Black Sheep (rock band) article. Richard3120 (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Overlake edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A group with an article on only one album doesn't need a navigational box. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not enough links to be useful. Nigej (talk) 21:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Maybe if the redlinks were still pages this could be kept, but the drafts were abandoned. -2pou (talk) 07:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Initially Corporation Limited edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Zzuuzz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No current article on this company, and I doubt it is notable. The potential subjects that could be made into articles (that are included in this navbox) are also probably not notable. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 15:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KEY-ERA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Useless Jc3s5h (talk) 02:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Subst if edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. There might be some general utility to the pagename for something else. Izno (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, largely per nom. The functionality is complicated enough that it'd likely be just as simple to code it on an individual basis. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 23:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pallacanestro Virtus Roma current roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Reasonable counter-arguments made. No prejudice against renomination if the caveats stop being valid. Primefac (talk) 02:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Virtus Roma does not exist anymore and the players listed in the template don't play anymore for the team. Therefore this template is not anymore in use. Deleting it looks like the right thing to do. Andiii (talk) 20:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The team does still exist and the article makes no mention of it ever having gone under, even for a brief time. At least three of the players listed do play for the team and are described as doing so currently. All I can find on Google is the team withdrawing for the season, but not folding as an organization. I'm not seeing much of a reason to delete this template, even if it needs a lot of work. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 06:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_December_23&oldid=997355594"