Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 2

May 2 edit

Template:2013 Indonesian Premier League table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

merged with 2013 Indonesian Premier League (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 20:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:55, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 FA WSL 1 table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:01, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

merged with 2016 FA WSL/FA WSL Spring Series (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 20:05, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:55, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indonesian Club Football edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

too broad in scope and unnecessary since it duplicates navigation found in Template:Liga 1 (Indonesia), Template:Liga 2 (Indonesia), ... Frietjes (talk) 15:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:55, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taxonomy links edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template which was deprecated and placed in a holding category for templates to be deleted. For more details, see this talk page thread at Wikipedia talk:Automated taxobox system Gonnym (talk) 13:22, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - per nom. What does this template even do? --Nessie (talk) 14:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tl2/belge edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. This looks like it was an experimental subpage created for some reason, and then never used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 10:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

All templates in Category:Unnecessary taxonomy templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:18, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This category is a temporary holding area for taxonomy templates whose deletion will be uncontroversial, because the template is both unused and unnecessary, e.g. because it is incorrectly set up, or relates to a taxon no longer used. Periodically, all templates in this category will be nominated for deletion. For more details, see this talk page thread at Wikipedia talk:Automated taxobox system. For a previous deletion discussion, see TFD for 27 Feb 2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 10:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, previous discussion and previous TfD. --Gonnym (talk) 13:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unnecessary, unused and can't be used anyway as functional content removed.   Jts1882 | talk  14:26, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per all the above. This is routine maintenance. --Nessie (talk) 14:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – routine maintenance as noted by others here. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:04, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Plantdrew (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).