Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 May 25

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< May 24 May 26 >

May 25 edit

Template:Fb p color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb cs section edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@S.A. Julio: It can be speedy deleted as WP:CSD#G7. Hhkohh (talk) 23:19, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb cl MLS header navbar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per prior discussion Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:36, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb rs old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:05, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mass A-League team shortcut templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meaningless substituted templates, not sure what's the usage and proposal Hhkohh (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 11:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Frietjes: Will be posted to TfD. Hhkohh (talk) 23:16, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all (and other categories mentioned), unnecessary and not a very useful typing aid for just a wikilink. S.A. Julio (talk) 18:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @S.A. Julio: As someone who edits A-League articles all the time, I find them a very useful typing aid. --SuperJew (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Umarghdunno (talk) 00:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - not needed. GiantSnowman 07:42, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all They are useful as typing-aids and any accidental transclusions will be automatically substituted by a bot, same as Template:Nfa etc. --SuperJew (talk) 13:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • SuperJew, Unlike {{nfa}}, {{nfa}} stands many by changing options while these templates only stands one. If you find these useful, I hope you can merge these into {{Aleagueteams}} and set many options. Hhkohh (talk) 13:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Hhkohh So then the solution would be merge, not delete. As it is I don't see the real issue with having them separate instead of merged, except for a few blips of storage data which is hardly meaningful difference. --SuperJew (talk) 13:51, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Notified WikiProject Football Australia Task Force. --SuperJew (talk) 13:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - not needed. Matilda Maniac (talk) 23:36, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:London Transport portal main heading edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the single use of this template, so that the portal page contains it own title. This is like the move to use fewer subpages in portals; similarly, unique single-use templates that hide how things work do more harm than good. Dicklyon (talk) 05:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Excess Wikidata modules edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:39, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, redundant to more heavily used modules {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 00:16, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Hi, a bit late to the party, but just wanted to note that Template:Entity formatting was created as supporting code in an attempt to port fr:Modèle:Bibliographie to enwiki. Since {{Cite Q}} provides similar capabilities, neither Template:Entity formatting nor the port of Modèle:Bibliographie was needed. Peaceray (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_May_25&oldid=844551011"