Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 January 26

< January 25	January 27 >

January 26 edit

Template:Palestinian territory development edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Palestinian territory development (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Proposed deletion of this template was the mainstream opinion of previous merger proposal from 2013.GreyShark (dibra) 16:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

comment no it wasn't. The closing admin suggested nominating this template for deletion could be considered, but did not express an opinion on whether it should be kept; the merger proposal made little sense, and was correctly rejected. --NSH002 (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per nomination: this template is trying to present an unclear message, mispresenting various unrelated maps, while there are already several articles on the topic, such as Palestine (region), Definitions of Palestine, Mandatory Palestine etc; this template is also highly overlapping Template:Palestinian nationalism.GreyShark (dibra) 17:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GreyShark it is mighty shady to not post this Talk to the pages it will affect. DigDeep4Truth (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note the WP:AFD states: "Nomination already implies that the nominator recommends deletion (unless indicated otherwise), and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line." Oncenawhile (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The template is used on three pages (Palestine, Palestinian territories and Israeli-occupied territories). It is also in three languages: English, Arabic and Portuguese. It is a helpful aide for readers to understand the region. The nom's assertions of what the template is "trying to do" are mystifying. If Greyshark has a content concern here, perhaps s/he could bring it up on the template's talk page. Oncenawhile (talk) 17:34, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep My opinion has changed since the last TFD: I think this template is fulfilling the role of an image, and should be kept as is to allow inclusion in several articles. It should probably be removed from the Palestine article, though it should remain in the other two articles. — This, that and the other (talk) 00:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A useful collection of images. --NSH002 (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are a number of problems with these sequence of maps. 1) Where is the plan that included cis-Jordan. 2) Where is the map that shows Arab owned land 1947 (Actual) 3) Where is the map that shows no Arab control between 1967-1993? The fact that the map mentioned in point 2) above does not appear makes this whole template slanted and therefore irrelavent. Chesdovi (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1) How does not drawing Jordan matter? What is Cis-Jordan? 2) Did Jews also Speak Arabic? It shows more land than Jews owned, it shows their families whether or not they were of the faith. 3) How about Actual 2007 ~ http://davidduke.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/West_Bank__Gaza_Map_2007_Settlements.jpg DigDeep4Truth (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please bring this up on talk at the template. But in summary (1) What plan are you referring to?; (2) Feel free to add this if you can find a source (one example is here; (3) this is made extremely clear in the text under the fourth map. Oncenawhile (talk) 20:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for posting this to the talk page. GreyShark it is mighty shady to not post this Talk to the articles it will affect. DigDeep4Truth (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per nom. Maps 1&2 irrelevant and misleading. Ankh.Morpork 22:17, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is misleading about it? It is clearly labeled. DigDeep4Truth (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The template is useful and correct. --IRISZOOM (talk) 12:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I nominate it be kept. In fact there needs to be a section of maps. Do you have something as informative to take its place? How can you discuss the Taking of Lands from Palestine and Occupation of lands within Palestine, without showing the land being taken? Are you trying to hide information from people? For what reason do you want it removed? DigDeep4Truth (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a helpful visual. If it's wrong/misleading, fix it. Goldenshimmer (talk) 21:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I do not care if the template exist or the content is substituted , but if the content is incorrect or dubius (and I dont know if it is), but if it is, it should be challenged with {{citation needed}} – if no sources exist it will probably be removed from the articles... Christian75 (talk) 11:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep! Absolutely informative and useful - I don't see any faults in this graphic. — Allrounder (talk) 13:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Greatrest Mystery Solvers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Greatrest Mystery Solvers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template that only includes articles that have been speedily deleted, and information relating to other non-existent works and characters. Shirt58 (talk) 11:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a no-brainer, all content fails the very basic GNG criteria, and this template is nothing but a navigation template between said - now non-existent - articles. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 11:12, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:IUCN Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 February 11 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.