Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 92

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 85 ← Archive 90 Archive 91 Archive 92 Archive 93 Archive 94 Archive 95

List of Running Man: Monday Couple episodes

reasoning -60.53.44.3 (talk) 08:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Achanak Group

I, Krishnav117, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Krishnav117 (talk) 13:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done. There was nothing to restore: the deleted AfC submission contained only the two words "Achanak Group". Looking further, I see that there is a draft in your user space at User:Krishnav117/Achanak Group, Baramati which has not been deleted. You have not edited it since August but have never submitted it. You can submit any time it is ready, by clicking the "Submit the page!" button in the box at the top of the page, but in its present form it will not be accepted, because it does nothing to show why the group is notable enough to have an encyclopedia article. That would require references showing significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources, in other words that people not connected with the group had thought it worth writing substantial comment about. JohnCD (talk) 16:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hamlet Isaxanli: Bibliography. Scholar, Founder, Poet

I, Buyerlerdeqalardim, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done - as an articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You need to provide references to show how it meets the notability standard of WP:Notability (books). JohnCD (talk) 16:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Hamlet Isaxanli: Bibliography. Scholar, Founder, Poet

I was unable to edit the page before it was deleted -Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done. This page has never existed as an encyclopedia article: the Articles for Creation page has been restored, see above. You have had more than two years, since March 2011, to edit it. JohnCD (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

stubby article is needed to open Fibrosis and related Concepts in Organ Diseases, Tumor Biology and Regenerative Medicine selected bibliography April 2013 and following ones becaus the bibliographies therein have too much template usage to run under a common article-title. So I need this. If wanted, I could give a small concept outline on the topics covered at the risk some1 says that there are articles around which discuss these concepts. -Ossip Groth (talk) 19:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done. This page is only for requesting undeletion of pages which have already been deleted. The article in your headline has not been deleted, though deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibrosis and related Concepts in Organ Diseases, Tumor Biology and Regenerative Medicine selected bibliography 2013 April, and that is where you should comment. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Jamsha

Not sure why the admin believed an artist with a strong fan base in Mexico, Puerto Rico and Europe, plus videos in YouTube with as many as three million hits, does not meet notability criteria -Demf (talk) 15:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

  •   Not done Although a WP:PROD, on biographies we have very tight requirements for sourcing, and the only one used on this article was on blogspot - which is unacceptable (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
  • So out of curiosity, what if a website uses wordpress for its engine? How is a .wordpress collective with ads any different than a .com? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlmaIV (talk • contribs) 18:06, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
A company website is a primary source - Wikipedia requires 3rd party reliable sources, so it's a rather moot question (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:31, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Anatory Software

Anatory software is a well known entity among the Minecraft community, as well as a growing entity within the Android (operating system) community. Their plugins have amassed more than 33,000 downloads for individual servers directly from http://dev.bukkit.org, as well as almost 25,000 downloads for a single app in the Google Play store. The intention of creating this page was not to advertise the products, but instead to document the history and notability of a growing company. I respectfully request that this page be considered for undeletion, and reconsidered for entry within the Wikipedia community. -MrMusAddict (talk) 08:15, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Jason Missiaen

Please restore edit history for this recently recreated article -Dolovis (talk) 21:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done by Graeme Bartlett. JohnCD (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

LuniaLaura

Promotional page -Lunialaura (talk) 06:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

...and deleted for exactly that reason.   Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia does not allow advertising or promotion anywhere, not even in user pages or sandboxes. JohnCD (talk) 08:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Winnequaheagh

Jmont1 (talk) 12:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done - this article already exists in mainspace at Winnequaheagh. JohnCD (talk) 16:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Rajiv Jain

well known guest lecturer on cinematography as well cinematographer -Christine markee (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Jain, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user J04n (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
If he is well known, you can surely find references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Click on Help:Userspace draft, fill in the title, and write a draft article which shows those references. Then approach J04n (talk), and if he does not agree go to WP:Deletion review. You will not get anywhere by just re-creating the same article and asserting that he is well-known. JohnCD (talk) 16:56, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
I've had to salt this page. Unfortunately an editor using multiple accounts has been re-creating this page and pages of a similar name repeatedly with in the last 24 hours. I would strongly recommend that an attempt be made via WP:AFC before trying trying again at REFUND or DRV. Mkdwtalk 19:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sad Clown Bad Winter 11

I, Sadchild, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Sadchild (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It needs references to significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show how it meets the notability standard of WP:NALBUMS. JohnCD (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Secrest, wardle, Lynch, Hampton, Truex and Morley, P.C.

reactive page for editing -208.90.197.194 (talk) 16:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

TheAmazingAtheist

He is much more notable since the last deletion of this page; he has been mentioned in countless 3rd-party sources by this point and has 125,000,000 YouTube views. That is 12 times as much as Karmin's "Hello", a song which has significant radio airplay and its own Wikipedia page, the existence of which is warranted only via awards which measure popularity. The only argument I could think of *against* including someone so obviously infamous is that their mentions will be mostly on websites and not traditional print media, but even then you can find mentions or coverage of him which lean more toward traditional media.[1] AlmaIV (talk) 17:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheAmazingAtheist, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Eluchil404 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Orange Mike | Talk 17:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Terrance A. Riley

reasoning -Wiw1984 (talk) 19:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC) I was in the middle of writing it when speedy gonzalez over there deleted it in the middle of me writing.

Sigma Team Games (Sigma Team)

Too much deletion can cause loosing of knowing the company sometimes.

This Russian company must be required due to their games they developed like Alien Shooter. They founded in 2003, headquarted in Novosibirsk and their office will be located in Tyumen. Please, I have been concerned about it because I hate speedy deletion. Next time, I don't want those administrations to delete Sigma Team. Now, restore it to recreate from change history, instead of article in Russian.

Thank you so much. -Rabbitgentleman (talk) 02:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Team, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ultraexactzz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Vancouver iTech Preparatory

This page explains the purpose of a new form of school in a respectable school disctrict. I'm wonering why it was deleted and if possible this page could be un-deleted. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wahula (talk • contribs) 18:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

  •   Done It was deleted due to no claim of importance, however schools are not eligible for this kind of speedy delete so I have restored it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)


thank-you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wahula (talk • contribs) 16:51, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Punch TV

There was no discussion and there is no obvious conclusion that the topic is not notable. -— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

  •   Not done The "article" was essentially a redirect to the company website. That's not permitted (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
    • That doesn't sound like anything I would have written.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
      • Yes you did not write it. Was there something else you were looking for? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
        • Well, that's a relief. So where is the article I wrote? I didn't think it was subject to speedy deletion.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 12:52, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
          • Found it! I developed it in user space because I wasn't confident. I'm still not.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 13:04, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Naderaleebrahim

Naderaleebrahim user page was related to all papers that Dr. Nader Ale Ebrahim has been published. The user page was not an advertising page, because his articles list are available everywehere on the internet. The Naderaleebrahim user page facilitate to find all relevant publication to "Research Tools" and "New Product Development" under one umbrella. By the way, I would be so appreciated if you could send me a copy of Naderaleebrahim user page, if you do not agree to return it alive. -Nader Ale Ebrahim (talk) 02:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

  • I tagged it for speedy deletion. WP is not for posting your CV, you can do that on LinkedIn, for example (and many other research-oriented websites). --Randykitty (talk) 08:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Fresh Healthy Vending

This is a multinational company sponsored by Michelle Obama, that is the first company to put "healthy" organic, vending machines in corporations, schools, and hospitals. They are industry pioneers. -69.120.142.198 (talk) 14:15, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Kilopi (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. If the article is to be kept, it needs references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish notability: the existing Forbes reference is a deadlink, and of the three external links two are the company's own and the other does not mention it. JohnCD (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

elang mahkota teknologi

i dont understand what is wrong with the article, i dont understand what is the meaning of 'contain advertising' because i keep editing and try to figure it out and also change it many times. this is for me and my friend's assignment, it is half of my final exam's score. please consider it because the deadline is tomorrow, june 7th 2013. please help to make this page work out and please dont delete it because we can actually fail if this article is not in wikipedia. thank you for your consideration. -Geastari (talk) 15:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Eliot Rambeau

I, Jgidley12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jgidley12 (talk) 20:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done. The "Articles for creation" submission this refers to, which has just been deleted after 18 months, was actually blank: it contained only the words "Talk: George Eliot Rambeau". After submitting that, you did post the article George Eliot Rambeau direct into the encyclopedia, and it was deleted by admin Peridon (talk) for reasons he discussed with you on his talk page at User talk:Peridon/Archives/2011/November#Article Deletion 'George Eliot Rambeau'; so far as I can see, you never took the matter any further. If you can find better references so as to show the significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources required to establish notability in Wikipedia's sense, you will need in the first instance to show them to Peridon. I suggest you do that first, to avoid possible waste of time, but if you wish I can "userfy" the article - undelete it into a sub-page in your user space where you can work on it. JohnCD (talk) 20:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Archdiocesan Boy Choir of Philadelphia

I have absolutely no idea why this was PRODded. As the official boy choir of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia, this is an incredibly important article, and a necessary asset. -AndrewrpTally-ho! 02:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.. Now all it needs is expansion through research and citations to reliable sources (nudge, nudge, wink wink).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Accurate Technologies Inc

The article for the Company Accurate Technologies Inc was selected for what you call a speedy deletion. I closely followed the “your first article” guidelines. I also found existing wikis such as this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETAS_Group, who are in the same classification to influence my writing style. All resources were sited, and definitions tagged. There was no advertising in the article, just the impartial history of the company and its products. This company has been around for over 20 years. They are a part of ECU calibration history. They are not a conflict of interest to wiki, otherwise articles such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_Informatik and the one listed above should also be removed. I am happy to make changes, I just need more specific areas that you feel are in violation, I don't believe this qualified for a speedy deletion. Person that did deletion: Dewritech. Reason for deletion given: It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.


Because of the speedy deletion I was not able to present my notability argument. This is just a small list. I can provide more.

Notability

ATI is ISO certified 9001:2000


ATI is published in SAE Off-Highway Engineering
SAE International is a global association of more than 128,000 engineers and related technical experts in the aerospace, automotive and commercial-vehicle industries. SAE International's core competencies are life-long learning and voluntary consensus standards development. SAE International's charitable arm is the SAE Foundation, which supports many programs, including A World In Motion® and the Collegiate Design Series.
Publication http://www.sae.org/ohmag/whatsnew/04-2003/part1.pdf


ATI is a member of ASAM (Association for Standardization of Automation and Measuring Systems)
ASAM coordinates the development of technical standards, which are developed by working groups composed of experts from our member companies. http://www.asam.net/nc/home/membership/company-directory/company-details.html?tx_rbwbasamcompanies_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=125


ATI partners with Nexus 5001 Forum
The Nexus 5001™ Forum Standard provides a general-purpose interface for the software development and debug of embedded processors. As advances in semiconductor and system design continue, embedded applications are using higher-performance embedded processors. Nexus 5001™ Forum members collaborate to advance the standard. http://www.nexus5001.org/news-events/pressreleases/accurate-technologies-inc-joins-nexus-5001%E2%84%A2-forum


ATI partners withEtherCAT Technology Group
At the ETG technical committee meetings the EtherCAT technology is presented and discussed in detail. Members are encouraged to join the technical working groups and task forces and provide comments as well as propose enhancements. http://www.ethercat.org/en/members/members_D54E9A0B7E6942A7B3F2AF81A29972AA.htm


ATI partners with MathWorks the leading developer of mathematical computing software for engineers and scientists. Founded in 1984, MathWorks employs 2800 people in 15 countries, with headquarters in Natick, Massachusetts, U.S.A. http://www.mathworks.com/products/connections/product_detail/product_35725.html

-Rowebot86 (talk) 12:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Sorry, but none of this is evidence of notability. Please consult the relevant policies and guidelines before creating further articles. --Randykitty (talk) 15:43, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
  • I am requesting the speedy delete be removed, so I can make your requested changes. "Speedy deletion is intended to reduce the time spent on deletion discussions for pages or media with no practical chance of surviving discussion." This article does stand a chance, because A. G11 states "Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." This article was neutral. B.Stated in A7 The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines.If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, which I was not given a chance to do so. There are sources in this article, thus a claim of importance has been made. The proper 7 day debate should have taken effect, not a speedy deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowebot86 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
It does read as advertising, though not as bad as some, and I would not have deleted it under A7, but putting that aside, it cannot be undeleted because it was a copyright violation, having copied and pasted content from at least this page. Note that if you own the copyright to the text you copied and pasted, that would not save it. For us to use someone's copyrighted text (where it's suitable for inclusion here at all) it must be released under a free license that allows anyone in the world to freely redistribute it even for commercial purposes (except, of course, for short quotes, marked as quotations). You can see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for how that's done. In any event, the article contained no citations I can see to any reliable secondary sources that were independent of the subject. Think mainstream newspaper articles by journalists, magazine articles, books, etc., all writing about the subject (not just things mentioned in the article) in detail, by people who are completely unconnected to it. Please don't take the fact that some articles currently exist and might be similar;y situated as an indication of suitability. The fact that other articles are here and have not been deleted or had there problems addressed (yet) means very little. Please see WP:WAX.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
So I have to make these changes and resubmit the article? I don't want to risk this topic being blocked. You are the first person that has directly referenced the article and gave me definitive answers. It seems that all other comments have been default answers, as if they didn't even read the article. I fear because this is a company that this situation will consist, that is why I wanted the article opened for debate rather than speedy deleted. Speedy deletions don't give the writer the chance to see other peoples thought's, and make suggested changes such as the ones you mentioned. A speedy deletion puts the writer at risk of their topic being blocked, even if they make the necessary changes when resubmitting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowebot86 (talk) 12:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Also the only thing that is similar to the website you pointed out is the structure, and the section terms. I did a comparison side by side for reference. The top examples are what was written in the wiki article.
I have removed your text as we can't be a host for a such a large swatch of copyrighted text, especially not outside of quotation marks. That, by the way, was the most promotional portion of the article, containing the most peacock language and corporate ad-speak. Without it, it would have had a much better chance of not having been found to be blatantly promotion. Anyway, it was irrelevant, since it wasn't the copyright violating text. It was the section below on Product History which contained, for example, directly copied and pasted from the website (but for the addition of one comma), "as its first emulation interface to enhance the capabilities of the new VISION software. The M5 and M6 memory emulators followed, and were the first of their kind, interfacing an ECU directly to a PC..." That is just a portion of the copied text. It will not be undeleted because of the copyvio, even if it would have been without. You can recreate without the copyvio, but if you are going to do so, the very first place to start is with gathering reliable secondary independent sources that show notability and verify the content. If they don't exist, the reality is: don't waste your time, the article will be deleted, if not immediately then later. If they do exist and you cite them instead of what was in the article before (and write it much more neutrally), then that has real potential. I suggest you do so, if at all, through the article wizard. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:45, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Room 4 Design Inc.

for improvement and changes to article for new submission -Frozatious (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

  • It was deleted because it was advertisement like. You can recreate a non promotional version if you wish. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Asabe Shehu Yar'Adua

Asabe Shehu Yar'Adua is the wife of Shehu Musu Yar'Adua who was the vice president during the Obasanjo military regime. -Expansive (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done That does not address the reasons for deletion. Neither of the incarnations of the article was remotely suitable as a Wikipedia article, and one of them, being a copyright infringement, would be illegal to restore. If she is notable, then a new and better article can be created from scratch, but please note that she would need to be notable in her own right, and notability is not inherited from a notable husband. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:21, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

act4africa

To amend to article so it fully complies with section A7 of Wikipedia's speedy deletion criteria -Cardinalz992 (talk) 06:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

LOGISTICS EFFICIENCY DESIGN

reasoning -MichaelRada (talk) 18:27, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Dear administrators I have created yesterday draft of topic related ton the new metodology I developed myself and implemented for Global SUpply Chain optimization projects. Due to unique setup and position of the Methodology I was requested by several clients to share more about and due to the fact that wikipedia is source of inforrmation, online encyclopedia I saw it as appropriate place.

As I said It was just a draft of topic for I did not know it will be published immediatelly.

Pleas let me kknow if such a metodology can be shared with others through wikipedia, or if this is unpropriate, I will choose different media for.

I would like to say that application of the methodology can have big implact of LOgistics global chains and it should not be related to my person only. It should become open know-how

thank you for oyur replay

Michael Rada

  Not done and will not be done 1) Wikipedia is not a place for original research. 2) Wikipedia is not a webhost for your new ideas; use MySpace or Facebook or Pinterest or whatever for that. 3) Wikipedia is not a venue to promote your business; we call that "spamming" and we will not tolerate it.. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Wendy Zavaleta

reasoning an real actress. -Ghostboy1997 (talk) 21:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Lots of real actors will never achieve sufficient notability to have articles here. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Indiana_State_Association_of_Middle_Eastern_Teachers_and_Dancers,_Inc.

97.78.211.226 (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If the article is to be accepted, you need references that show significant coverage in reliable independent sources to establish notability; see also Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. JohnCD (talk) 13:04, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Dovado

Arguably not advertising, the link to dovados website was as a reference for the products list, and the router Dovado Pro is actually called that. -Miningpyropony (talk) 06:36, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Matt_Darling

The article was deleted for Reason A7; however, Matt Darling is the inventor or a hospital ward management system recently featured in the press (http://www.smh.com.au/national/heart-and-mind-20130603-2nkn0.html) I had plans to substantially extend the article today based on the press article as well as other sources. I would argue that Matt Darling will be a man of public interest if he is not already, at least here in Australia -58.96.125.51 (talk) 08:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. See also WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Stephen Melamed

Was deleted for no conceivable reason, should be restored for those who look at it and use it -71.201.24.9 (talk) 17:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

  •   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I have notified Piotrus, the editor who originally added the Prod tag of this restoration. GB fan 17:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Moses

I, Kurzweil1!, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Kurzweil1! (talk) 19:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

  Comment::You have removed the speedy deletion template, as you are quite entitled to, so the page has not been deleted: but you will see that the submission as you made it (as KenKurzweil (talk · contribs) on 10 August 2012) is blank, containing nothing but the AfC submission template. See WP:Your first article for advice, and consider using the WP:Article wizard to guide you through the process. JohnCD (talk) 20:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Green Ginger

I, 82.46.62.244, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 82.46.62.244 (talk) 21:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

please dotn't delete it.

General Information: A educational insitute of Mirkot, Gorkha, offering comprehensive learning and education. The official page for Mirkothsschool. Like us for informations on the society as well as upcoming talks, debates and events and news! Description: One of the oldest educational organization in Mirkot VDC. It is a rural high school of Mirkot-4, Bagdanda. It wasestablished in 2017 B.S. The school runs the classes from class 01 to 12. It was started to educate the people arround Mirkot VDC. Majority of the students are from Bhramhin, Chetri , Tamang, Gurungetc. Students comes from Sera, Sanabesi, Simalgaira, Supare, Dhaukhola,Ramche, Bridi, Kusuntar etc. Every year the school products good results in SLC, DLE and Board Examinations — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirkothss (talk • contribs) 02:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done Please add your content by adding to the Mirkot article instead of replacing the content. You work was not actually deleted, but is in the history of the article. Your content can be seen at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mirkot&oldid=558995404 A foolish idea to delete the Mirkot article was closed with a speedy keep. So please go back to editing and improving it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Pegasus Auto Garage

Article was split from Gekisou Sentai Carranger and then speedy deleted because it was assumed to be a copyvio of this unlisted Wikipedia mirror. -—Ryulong (琉竜) 08:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Endorphin Power company

I, Kangareu2001, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Kangareu2001 (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia; I have just recieved your notice that proposed entries greater than 6 months old are deleted (Or, so is my understanding of the message I have recieved from you'se....At least that is my working basis from which I am trying to contact you...) I am not the only person that has tried to get an entry on a 10 year old community organization in Albuquerque. I did put a significant amount of effort into it in November of 2011 and was trying to uphold the documentation requirements. I was in the process of fact checking (some of the endorphon power companies own references to itself were misprinted... I was trying to contact the source paper (the Weekly Alibi, a local newspaper. Long story short, I both got busy and had my computor crash on me.

Anyway, since I got your notification (perhaps again... I do not recall if one was sent earlier) I would like to start up again and finish the project this time. I do believe the organization is worthy of an entry.

thanks,

Reuben Last -Kangareu2001 (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Tetsuji Murakami

reasoning -Ibipatria (talk) 19:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Tetsuji Murakami

"Completely unsourced biographical article with no demonstration of notability" Is not correct, please, see:

http://www.mushinkai.net/pages/portuguese/PortugueseSite.htm http://www.cyberbudo.com/cyberbudo/memorials.php http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B22LIQr_Nw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ob6r0wSOieE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5Y1EiFTFDw

So, please, stop deletion.

Thank you. Regards

  Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. You may remove the PROD template, as it explains, but the article as it stands is indeed unsourced, and you should add references to show significant coverage in reliable independent sources to establish notability. Note that Youtube is not considered a reliable source. JohnCD (talk) 21:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

User:IntlWriters

reasoning -WilliamTaylorSimpson (talk) 00:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

The User Page was deleted by RHaworth. The page was there as stated so that book reviews could be added at a later date. This has been one of a series of deletes and renames by RHaworth.WilliamTaylorSimpson (talk) 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

It appears your account was renamed ... why are you signing into your old account now? We do not keep pages up for "book reviews to be added" ... was it a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Tyler Bunz

Contested PROD.Meets criteria #4 of WP:NHOCKEY as WHL Top Goaltender and First Team All-Star. -Dolovis (talk) 14:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Pokemon Ash Gray

reasoning -SheaYayIsDaMaster (talk) 16:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC) Pokémon Ash Gray Is A Rom Hack About Pokémon Anime To See More Info Go To This Page Pokémon (Anime)

Hmm? Your article hasn't been deleted yet. The deletion discussion is ongoing. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 17:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Not anymore it isn't. Hence:
  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemon Ash Gray, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user LFaraone (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

ma sandbox is not a harrassful biography space

hey, I'm not too well versed in all the procedures here. Can I see an official policy that (G10: Attack page or negative unsourced BLP) Wikipedia:CSD#G10 can be applied to my sandboX?!? I don't even remember what I put in there. regarding template:db-negublp, what living person is at issue here? what unsourced biography did I supposedly write? Wikipedia:CSD#G10 does not seem to be written such that it applies to userpages. thank you. -skakEL 19:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

  • It's just crass and inane and trivializes rape - I took a peek. However, as nobody is actually mentioned, it's not covered under WP:BLP. But seriously - why would you want it undeleted? - Alison ❤ 19:21, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done Any page that starts "fuck you nigger" and states that you reserve the "right" to commit rape, oppression and/or genocide has no place here or any other civilized place in this universe. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

New Jersey Hammerheads

The team is notable because it competes in the highest level of professional ultimate frisbee play in the world, the American Ultimate Disc League (AUDL). While young, it still has attracted a large fan base and competes across the Untied States and Canada against other professional ultimate frisbee teams. It is as notable as many other low level pro teams in leagues such as the Independent Women's Football League, the Professional Lacrosse League, or the Rugby Super League; all of whose teams have and deserve articles. The New Jersey Hammerheads notability exists in the fact they are a high level, professional ultimate frisbee team in the highest level of professional ultimate league in America. -Redfox1294 (talk) 00:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Redfox1294/New Jersey Hammerheads.. Notability on Wikipedia is quite a specific concept; the subject of an article needs to have received significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. Please edit the userpage draft, adding citations to such sources, before moving the article back to mainspace. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Open Eyes Mission

Sorry, I did not know that I was disobeying the rules, I will edit the site as swiftly as I can, sorry once again. -Yananmelo12 (talk) 13:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://openeyesmission.org/. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Philip Varone

Contested PROD -Dolovis (talk) 14:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beyond Athletic Life Lessons, Inc. ("BALL")

I, 208.127.151.46, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 208.127.151.46 (talk) 04:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done; as a contested G13 deletion this AFC page has been restored on request. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Beyond Athletic Life Lessons, Inc. ("BALL")

BALL is a non profit serving youth athletics and public/charter schools -208.127.151.46 (talk) 04:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

IEASSA

wish to have the article undeleted. -Henri.Bilodeau (talk) 05:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://ieassa.org/en/about-association/about-us/. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BricsCAD

I, 141.134.34.227, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 141.134.34.227 (talk) 09:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done - your request is perfectly valid, but the deleted page was in fact blank (well, as near as makes no difference; it contained the usual AFC template and a redirect to Bricscad). There's nothing to restore, I'm afraid. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

BricsCAD

article was under review and final comments had been address, was awaiting final approval -141.134.34.227 (talk) 09:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done; the page BricsCAD has never been created in article space. As per my message above, there is an article at Bricscad. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

pajoohyar

its software like zotero,medenley,endnote .they have page in wiki

&its free software& pajoohyarwiki just want to introduce software .This page can complete wiki encyclopedia -Farahenaz (talk) 11:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC) Farahenaz (talk) 11:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Stephen Melamed

Important figure within the US industrial design field, particularly in his work in education, not to mention the many awards he has won as well. -66.104.192.66 (talk) 15:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

  Not done This page is for requesting restoration of pages which have already been deleted. The article you refer to has not been deleted, but deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Melamed, and that is where you should comment. Read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 17:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Richard Divall

Deleted in error -Londonopera (talk) 16:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Note: The requester is actually asking for Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Divall. See my talk page. Pol430 talk to me 16:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
  Done. I'm sorry, I don't know how that came to be deleted, the history is confused. I have restored it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Divall and re-submitted it to the WP:Articles for creation queue. JohnCD (talk) 17:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Shadow Reduction Technology (SRT)

I, Foddocs, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Article had not been edited in a while but I do wish to have it move forward. I did not know of the time considerations or of the speedy deletion code until just now as I was gone over the weekend and the article was tagged Friday night. -Foddocs (talk) 19:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Dustin Sylvester

Contested PROD -Dolovis (talk) 22:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Tyler Ruegsegger

Contested PROD -Dolovis (talk) 22:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Centre for Emotional Health

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 137.111.13.161 (talk) 00:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

thermomix

reasoning -188.195.197.236 (talk) 16:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

  •   Not done This was the second time it's been deleted as promotional - and once I saw the unsourced phrase "the most advanced...", it was obvious as to why (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:20, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Madison

reasoning -Piache (talk) 16:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC) I am confused on creating a page, Jason Madison is cousin to LA rapper Dom Kennedy and is mentioned on his page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dom_Kennedy. I tried re-directing it and was unable to. I did not understand the format of the wiki. I have a lot of information on Jason and Worldstar hiphop just released one of his many videos. I apologize for the inconvenience. Jason has been doing a lot of things recently and I think updating them on the wiki would be beneficial. He is a director and rapper and has over 30 videos out online. Please guide me in doing this correctly. Thank you.

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:The Hamsters albums

The articles had been redirected, but are now restored. -Peter James (talk) 23:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Peter James (talk) 23:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://www.activistpost.com/2012/09/adam-kokesh-debates-amazing-atheist.html
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_92&oldid=1136434515"