Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 122

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 115 ← Archive 120 Archive 121 Archive 122 Archive 123 Archive 124 Archive 125

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Wolf (game designer)

I, Kasha.re, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 'Kash (talk) 16:42, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Fuser (band)

Is an NZ based rock band that is still going and I can no longer find the page. See www.facebook.com/fuserband for verification. Thanks. Ian -Blackwian (talk) 07:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuser (band) (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Beeblebrox (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The fact that a band is "still going on" is not enough to have an article - see WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 09:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrei Prychodko

I, Venether, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Venether (talk) 21:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Stephanie Cholensky

This person, as co-chair of the Socialist Party USA, is a nationally recognized figure. Therefore, it stands to reason that she should merit a simple Wikipedia page as all other nationally recognized pubic do. -Dreldnihcs (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Nothing to do. Article is not deleted, and hasn't recently been proposed for deletion. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Actually, it was PROD-deleted in January, but restored yesterday by the deleting admin - request was made on his talk page as well as here. As he points out, the sourcing is pretty thin - just an engagement announcement, Zoominfo entry and entry in party organization list. The General Notability Guideline looks for "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (my emphasis), and in its present form I doubt whether this would survive a deletion discussion. JohnCD (talk) 10:03, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IPR License

I, Abbierh, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abbierh (talk) 10:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:47, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/64 to Grayson

I, Zigzag329, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Music Man (talk) 03:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:MUSICBIO and note that Twitter, Youtube and other places where anyone can post anything they like are not considered reliable sources for establishing WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 09:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

infobeans

no idea why it was deleted, I know for sure it existed few years ago. I can contribute to the page to make it relevant and credible -VirtualAvi (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Southeastern Institute of Research

The original article was most likely deleted due to a failure to establish notability and/or the appearance of advertising. Unfortunately, this was the result of establishing the page before it was finished. If possible, I would like to have the article reinstated so that it can be properly populated, formatted, and cited. Before debuting the page, I will create a completed draft in my sandbox, which I should have done the first time. -Coldon (talk) 15:01, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done: this has not actually been deleted. Deletion was suggested, but instead the reviewing administrator redirected it to The Boomer Project, the article about the parent body. The original text is still there in the history: if you click on Southeastern Institute of Research, when the Boomer Project article opens, at the top under the title you will see "redirected from Southeastern Institute of Research." Clicking on that will take you back to the redirect, and then clicking on "View history" will show you earlier versions including yours. You can copy the text from there to work on, but if SIR is to have a stand-alone article you will need to demonstrate that it has WP:Notability independent of the Boomer Project, which means showing references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Before re-posting it, check with user Bbb23 (talk), the administrator who redirected it. JohnCD (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

DJ ANKEAT

DJ ANKEAT is a page about a dj from surat and it is originl artist page -116.73.214.75 (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
See WP:MUSICBIO for inclusion criteria. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Cheley Colorado Camps

Article was deleted after being prod'ed. Would like the opportunity to expand original article and make it notable. ---evrik (talk) 15:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify users TastyPoutine (talk) and Atama (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Could you please tend to this one as well? --evrik (talk) 18:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

zalp

We intend to modify this page with neutral information, as well as to provide better sourcing for the claims made herein. It will be expanded with a description of our industry, products pertinent to the industry. We aren't marketing. -Zalp pebstone (talk) 11:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

  Comment: Oh, not marketing at all ES&L 12:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
  Not done and user has been indef blocked for spamming and violating the username policy. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Tyler Wotherspoon

Deleted by PROD, player has been recalled to the NHL. -Please restore the edit history for this recreated article. Dolovis (talk) 05:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A V Varadachar

I needed to gather info before I could submit and I got sucked into other things. I want to revive the article -Sriharibn (talk) 05:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Philippines national football team championships

I, Burac21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Burac21 (talk) 13:38, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Win Rosenfeld

74.66.251.65 (talk) 13:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Nashi Dragneel

It helps people know about a fan fiction that is soon to be true!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NashiDragneel (talk • contribs) 18:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A1. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Also note that we don't permit advertising, especially for something that doesn't exist yet. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done Perhaps A1 was not appropriate, but this was an advert. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gualala Robotics

I, Lightmovers, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lightmovers (talk) 04:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ORNL Computational Data Analytics Group

I'm simply building a skeleton for a client - I will change the promotional language in a day or two - You already undeleted it once and told me the "stale" article would be up for six months, then redeleted it again. Please undelete it so I can change the content. Thanks, Scott — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.91.38.40 (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

I suggest you read WP:Conflict of interest before you proceed. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
  Already done Well Jeremy, part of the purpose of AFC is for people with COIs to get their work checked this way. So COI is not a reason to delete or fail to restore. The page is now at User:ORNLPirhana/ORNL Computational Data Analytics Group anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Jimmie Jansson

Please restore edit history for this recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. In fact, since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmie Jansson happened recently, and the new article contains no new information from the deleted version, I have nominated it for speedy deletion in accordance with WP:CSD#G4. The place to go, if you don't agree with that deletion decision, is WP:DRV, but only after you contact the deleting admin The Bushranger (talk · contribs). ~Amatulić (talk) 21:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Actually, the recreated article does have new information as the subject has played games in the Swedish Hockey League thereby establishing the presumption of notability pursuant to WP:NHOCKEY. Speedy delete has been declined. Please restore edit history.Dolovis (talk) 22:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Did you contact the deleting admin? ~Amatulić (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
This is not an issue for Deletion Review; the article has already been recreated, and the article does not qualify for SD#G4. Dolovis (talk) 00:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
  Done history restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brandon Ramkey

I, 107.206.12.71, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 107.206.12.71 (talk) 07:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martynov Andrey Semenovich

I, Сергій Казнадій, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Сергій Казнадій (talk) 17:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Question: This is the English Wikipedia. Of what possible value is an article that is not written in English? ~Amatulić (talk) 17:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Has anyone pointed him to ru.wp? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:40, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
His SUL account shows that he has an account with >100 edits on the Ukrainian WP. JohnCD (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Ah, OK. I can't tell Ukrainian from Russian, sadly. —Jeremy vX_Xv Bori! 20:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Emerald Mountain School

This article was set for PROD but was not notified. Think I missed it. I posted the article to just get things started. I was planning on adding content once I saw the article was up and running. Once it goes back up I will add content that will hopefully differentiate it from other elementary schools. This request was stated on the article by whomever deleted it. Still new to the process and just trying to figure out how best to go about creating an article. Thank you. -Zeketaken (talk) 16:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Comment This is an elementary school, and nless there is something really significant these articles are almost always deleted. It can however be turned into a redirect to the school district or location? DGG ( talk ) 19:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
The complete text by Ruby Murray was : Emerald Mountain School is a primary school in Steamboat Springs, Colorado in the United States. It was formerly known as Lowell Whiteman Primary School.
If there is some actual notability you can recreate the page but make sure it includes enough to show it's notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Kazys Morkunas

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -GregSproles (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

I want to add a very famous artist's description, can i do this. This artist only recently died, so according to the rules I can not upload information ? Thank you

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. However, I have re-prodded it for deletion. You have 10 days to get some reliable sources into the article or it will be deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:45, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

*Kazys Morkunas · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] @Amatulic: the last version i saw was pretty unacceptable, but he may meet WP:ARTIST "among the best masters" and "well known Lithuanian masters". If you move it to my draft space I will take a look at it this weekend to see if there is anything salvageable and if it contains any hints for searching for other sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

its apparently a copyright vio.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

County Roads in Florida

history undeletion under redirect.

(the history of 0342 may actually be under County Road 342 (Leon County, Florida), depending on when the moves were made) -NE2 05:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done Some of these were results of AFDs, so do not turn them into articles again without addressing the problems. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I have no plans to turn any into articles; the only one I could see maybe being one is CR 42, and for now it fits well as part of a larger list. --NE2 23:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chantelle Redman

I, Kraftneu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kraftneu (talk) 02:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Naman Chopra

I, Artdaily112, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Artdaily112 (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Biopolitics and Biopolitics International Organisation

Bios wiki (talk) 07:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Kulicke & Soffa Industries

This page is included in a student education project, and the course page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Uttsinghuajoint2014/Course_Page .Since it was deleted for Expired PROD, I sincerely request for undeletion, so I can improve it. Thanks a lot! -Kekoukele (talk) 07:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Amtech Systems

This page is included in a student education project, and the course page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Uttsinghuajoint2014/Course_Page .Since it was deleted for Expired PROD, I sincerely request for undeletion, so I can improve it. Thanks a lot! -Kekoukele (talk) 07:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Dave Wallace (musician)

Dave Wallace is a UK dance (mainly Drum & Bass, Jungle, and Breakbeat) producer having over 200 writing, producing and remixing credits Dave Wallace's producing / writing catalog on Discogs.com He co-wrote and co-produced the UK version of the 2009 No.2 UK Singles Chart release 'Riverside (Let's Go!)' and is part of the UK Drum and Bass band http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquasky who have been active since 1995. Aquasky on Discogs.com

82.26.35.53 (talk) 20:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. The deleted article appears to be about a different person altogether. Feel free to register an account and create a new article. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

I am surprised the deleted article was about a different person because the link for it is from his band Aquasky's Wikipedia page. Is it possible to view the deleted article? If it just contains some inaccuracies then I will submit / edit (I am new to this!) some new information. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helixoxford (talk • contribs) 22:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

It links because in the Aquasky article someone wrote [[Dave Wallace (musician)]] but the article of that name, deleted seven years ago, was about a "Guitarist / Songwriter – born Oakland, California 9/5/53" who operated mainly in LA and SF, only visiting London "where he did some minor recording" in 1984/5. Not your man. You are welcome to write a new article: read WP:Your first article and WP:MUSICBIO for advice. JohnCD (talk) 22:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks for that info. I was just curious! I might consider writing a short article about the actual person. Will have a look at the first article links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helixoxford (talk • contribs) 21:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Michigan Triangle

It looks like the page "The Michigan Triangle" was redirected to "Michigan Triangle" in 2011, then "Michigan Triangle" was deleted yesterday, 3/9/14, by Joe Decker with no reason given, and "The Michigan Triangle" was deleted on 3/10/14 with a note saying the redirect was not working (obviously because the page it redirects to was deleted yesterday). I thought I had visited this page before and it looked like it was working fine, so I am not sure why it was deleted today, but I would love to see it put back up. -173.160.150.153 (talk) 22:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. "No reason given"? The reason given was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michigan Triangle. Deletion as a result of a deletion discussion disqualifies it from restoration by request on this page. If you don't believe the discussion was closed properly, please consult with the deleting admin, and if you are still not satisfied, take your case to WP:DRV. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

DesignContest

Can`t see any reason to delete this article, since it is not worse then similar.SlavaBest (talk) 07:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)SlavaBest -SlavaBest (talk) 07:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DesignContest, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user NativeForeigner (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
In regard to other articles, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I see that the administrator who closed the deletion discussion offered to "userfy" the article on request, i.e. move it into a subpage in your user space where you could work on it. JohnCD (talk) 10:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Don Peachey

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -JanineRivers (talk) 18:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

I was creating this page and I must have started it in the wrong area and it was deleted as in "Speedy deletion!" My mistake but I just want the info I had created to finish in my draft area for eventual submission. Thank you!

  Not done and will not be done because Wikipedia is not to be used for promotion or publicity, which is exactly what you were trying to do with that article. Articles must be written in a neutral tone. See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view as well as WP:42 for guidance. If you are associated with the subject, then I suggest you try WP:AFC for submitting articles instead. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Bailey Ltd

Will (talk) 11:06, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. to get this as an article it will need to have independent references, and be less promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prism Skylabs

I, Dkleinsf, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dkleinsf (talk) 16:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

We'd like to re-submit our page for approval. -Dkleinsf (talk) 16:45, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

We do not permit shared accounts. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:31, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This will have to be less promotional to have any chance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:44, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Juan Carlos Romualdez Velez

Juan Carlos Romualdez Velez is one of the Philippines Most eligible people -PeeJay TrueCopy (talk) 07:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edie.net

edie.net is a notable site and a major source of objective information in the field of sustainability -195.59.199.242 (talk) 12:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Cape doctor (talk) 20:38, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

cr2 records

Article should not have been deleted, there is now Cr2 Records Wikipedia page -Lewisdodkins (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Nothing to do. No page by that name has ever existed on Wikipedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
@Amatulic: It's Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cr2 Records. You would think such pages would be easily found through a search but they're not.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia..--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:23, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Artemis Networks

Artemis Networks is a company founded by a notable person, has had notable news coverage (CNET, PC Magazine, Business Insider, Huffington Post and over 70 others), has shown very notable technology, and so on. I feel it meets the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia as I understand them. -OKNoah (talk) 05:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user De728631 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aceleratech

I, 200.198.121.123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 200.198.121.123 (talk) 20:36, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done. This was blatant copyright infringement of the content at this page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leo Horsfield

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Micahel Turner (talk) 18:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done @Micahel Turner: Hi Michael. Since you did not wait for your request to be acted upon but recreated the page, I have undeleted the prior page history. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Favorite betrayal criterion

This article was soft-deleted after only the nominator supported deletion in a "stealth nomination". The deletion nominator has a clear conflict of interest; he is the inventor of the Schulze method and related sub-methods, which do not pass this criterion. The criterion was originated relatively recently and is not widely cited in the academic literature, but it is discussed more and more in more ephemeral WP:RSs. Note that inclusion in Wikipedia should not be based on a judgement of whether this criterion is desirable, just on whether "it is a thing"; that is, whether it is a well-defined entity that a person well-versed in the field would know of. For instance, it shows up in surveys of voting criteria, as in [1] and [2]. I can also personally report that Arrow, Tideman, Sen, and Maskin (a few of the universally-recognised biggest "names" in this field) are all aware of this criterion. This is exactly the kind of well-defined niche technical jargon that is useful to have on Wikipedia. -Homunq (࿓) 15:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC) (Note: I also suggest that if we want broader discussion on this, somebody should post a notice on Voting system, the main topic page. I won't do so to avoid the appearance of canvassing, but I don't think this would actually be canvassing, as that page gets attention from a wide variety of viewpoints.) Homunq (࿓) 15:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Normally an article that got deleted as a result of AFD would not qualify for undeletion request on this page, although lightly-discussed AFD would merit userfying at least. However, given that this was the sixth AFD, which referenced all the previous ones, I am reluctant to restore it unilaterally. You really need to talk to the deleting admin Mark Arsten (talk · contribs) first, and if you are not satisfied with the admin's response, take it to WP:DRV. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Additional comments

I've tried to contact Arsten on his talk page, but it seems he's taking a few weeks away from WP: Special:Contributions/Mark_Arsten&offset=&limit=500&target=Mark+Arsten. Obviously, since I didn't even notice until now, this is not a huge rush, but I'd also rather not have this discussion take weeks. Given that he was clear that it was a SOFTDELETE, is there anyone else who could help me with this? Of course, we'd probably have to give the delete-nominator a chance to have his say, too. Homunq (࿓) 20:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done Which part of WP:DRV were you having issues with? It was even linked above for you DP 22:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Twigs

I, Twinester, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Twinester (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - @Twinester: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

File:LiceoCBA.jpg

I would like to request the retention of the Liceo CBA Logo as it is very essential for the students of that certain university, just for archive purposes, i would like to appeal for the speedy resolution of this request. CommanderPhoenix (talk) 07:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done. I have restored the file, and reset the timer on the di-no-fair-use tag, so you have seven days to add this to an article, and fill in the article name under REQUIRED on the FUR. JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Delta_Debugging

Delta Debugging was PRODed for being an advertisement, but it is an algorithm, not a product from a vendor. As such, the article just needs updating to describe the algorithm and provide other references. -203.171.80.201 (talk) 04:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Blelbach (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The WP:Notability requirement is for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 10:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The ACE Study

I, Vjkrist, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vjkrist (talk) 05:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Khursheed Khan

Please undelete this name article page because i will edit it again with wikipedia rules -Nice2013 (talk) 12:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done User blocked as a sock of User:Khursheed Khan Pictures. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Veerendra Senar

this page is real person article, i know this person , we have personally attachment , he is film director and writer , so i have create article about his biography , filmography -Mahesh1985 (talk) 06:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KOLO (Band)

I, Danimourinho, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Danimourinho (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chaney Instrument Co / AcuRite

I, LandBT15, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LandBT15 (talk) 16:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Didier Courbot

I, Hannah.Monroe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hannah.Monroe (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FlexWage Solutions

I, Phx-sw-engineer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Phx-sw-engineer (talk) 17:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Ser3ndipity

The page was deleted within seconds citing (A7. No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events) however when reading the information attributed to this section it stipulates 'This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works' I have placed in bold the relevant section. I may have misunderstood however the article was in relation to a creative blog and as such not a specific person or individual. If there is some other place I should look to make reference then I am happy to regroup. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ser3ndipity13 (talk) 19:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The page is about web content, that is why it is in scope for an A7 delete. It also looked like an advertisement promoting the blog. You can use the WP:Article for creation process to write a page at a more leisurely process. But it will be tough to get your topic approved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Green Light Radio (KGLR)

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Rcolbert13 (talk) 23:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - @Rcolbert13: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/spinci

70.225.142.34 (talk) 15:15, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

No explanation given. What would be the point in restoring something so blatantly promotional that it would have to be rewritten? ~Amatulić (talk) 19:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Cobra Gym 24 Hour Fitness

Please,this is my first time writing article.I have no idea why it is deleted.please help me by showing me which areas to be improved and pls pls pls don't delete my post.pls help me to provide necessary info so that my post won't be deleted -Cobragym1 (talk) 18:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. @Cobragym1: Hi Cobragym1. If you look at the deletion log entry for the article you will see the reason given when it was deleted twice, including links to section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion as well as to the section of policy with the shortcut WP:NOTADVERTISING. This article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:36, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
User has been blocked as a spamusername. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:15, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Rowan Tree

I, Theano2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Theano2 (talk) 17:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done ~Amatulić (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Sirenism

Deleted because of inappropriate and fabricated content, the page details a particular type of zoophilia, which while new, is not a fabrication- simply a recognition of a specific group -Slightlyleft (talk) 22:01, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

  Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The article was actually deleted under three CSD criteria, specifically A11, A7 (which can't be overturned here) and A10 (which also can't be overturned here). While the A11 can be challenged here, the A7 and A10 cannot. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Jakub Sokolik

Please restore the previous history before it was deleted by AfD -JMHamo (talk) 15:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Francis_Leo_Antonio_Marcos

Will run for candidacy of election. thus provide page for reseach purposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.90.228 (talk) 10:39, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note that just being a political candidate does not count towards WP:Notability (see WP:POLITICIAN), and an article will not be accepted unless it is writtenfrom a WP:Neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not for promotion of political candidates, or anything else. JohnCD (talk) 12:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maximus Extreme Living Solutions

I, MEShaner65, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MEShaner65 (talk) 15:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Request restoration to review for possible edits. Helpful comments and suggestions always welcomed. MEShaner65 (talk) 15:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)MEShaner65

  Done - @MEShaner65: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_122&oldid=1090623066"