Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by If Beale Street Could Talk/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by If Beale Street Could Talk edit

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by If Beale Street Could Talk/archive1

Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 07:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If Beale Street Could Talk is a 2018 American romantic drama film directed and written by Barry Jenkins. Based on James Baldwin's novel of the same name, it follows a young African-American woman who, with her family's support, seeks to clear the name of her wrongly charged husband and prove his innocence before the birth of their child. The film's cast includes KiKi Layne, Stephan James, Colman Domingo, Teyonah Parris, Michael Beach, Dave Franco, Diego Luna, Pedro Pascal, Ed Skrein, Brian Tyree Henry and Regina King. The film was nominated for three Academy Awards at the 2019 ceremony and won the award for Best Supporting Actress. This is my seventh film accolades list to be nominated for featured list status, and I largely based the format off of the accolades lists for The Artist, The Big Short, Dunkirk, 1917, The Shape of Water, and Slumdog Millionaire. I will gladly accept your comments to improve this list. Birdienest81talk 07:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I got nothing, nothing at all. Great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:06, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pamzeis edit

I hope I will not screw this up

"performance as Sharon Rivers" — my first thought was: "who the hell is she?" I mean, I think that sums it up pretty well... but she isn't brought up prior to this, so mentioning her name does not really add anything (at least for me it doesn't)
Most titles of works are italicised in citations, but some aren't, e.g. Green Book in ref 62
Check for MOS:QWQ issues within refs

Hope this helps :) Pamzeis (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pamzeis: - Done: I have read your comments and made the necessary corrections based off of them.

--Birdienest81talk 19:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- Support. Pamzeis (talk) 04:34, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB) edit

Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. You don't need/want them on other cells in the row- so e.g. ! scope="row" rowspan="5"|[[Alliance of Women Film Journalists]] is the right cell, but you don't also need the | scope="row" rowspan="5"| January 10, 2019 right after it, that should just be | rowspan="5"| January 10, 2019. Also, for the "rows" where the primary cell spans multiple actual rows with a rowspan—which appears to be all of them—it should be using scope="rowgroup", e.g. ! scope="rowgroup" rowspan="5"|[[Alliance of Women Film Journalists]].
Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --Pres N 00:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PresN: - Done: I have read your comments and made the appropriate adjustments based off of them.

--Birdienest81talk 09:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I have made some small copy-edits, which you are free to revert if you don't like. I don't have any other comments of my own but do address Pamzeis's concerns though. FrB.TG (talk) 06:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – Pass edit

Will do soon. Aza24 (talk) 01:07, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

Refs 25 and 26 are formatted differently but are the same site. Aza24 (talk) 01:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability

No issues

Verifiability

No issues Aza24 (talk) 01:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pass for source review, with the expectation that the above comment will be addressed

@Aza24: Done - I linked the first mention of Black Reel Awards and delinked the last mention in the references. It should be consistent now.

--Birdienest81talk 12:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from TRM edit

"directed and written" feels like an odd order, usually I see "written and directed"?
"her wrongly charged husband" should wrongly-charged be hyphenated in this usage?
" $20.6 million" etc, non-breaking spaces before "million" each time please.
Last sentence of lead is unreferenced which seems odd considering most of the rest of the lead is (although in several cases, unnecessarily).
Ref 7 has a spaced hyphen, make it an en-dash per MOS please.

Otherwise is good work, cheers. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 16:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: - Done: I've read your comments, and have made corrections and adjustments based off of them.

--Birdienest81talk 06:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image review – The article has one image, which has an appropriate free license and suitable alt text. This aspect of the page looks okay to me. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:11, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.