Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Zussman1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! FiddleFaddle 11:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dvore House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! Zussman1,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FiddleFaddle 11:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hello, Zussman1! I'd like to invite you to join the Percy Jackson task force, which works to improve articles related to Rick Riordan and his books. Check out our page or contact me to learn more! 2ReinreB2 (talk) 02:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Zussman1. You have new messages at 2ReinreB2's talk page. Message added 00:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply
Hi Zussman1! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sovereign Sentinel was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dvore House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! Zussman1,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! sovereign°sentinel(contribs) 16:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Disambiguation link notification for August 15edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guys Read, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Buckley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Percy Jackson's Greek Heroes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Change WP:PJTF scope to cover all of Rick Riordan's works?edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, Zussman1, hate to be "that guy" who keeps harping on this, but I'm hoping to get all the Percy Jackson Task-force members to reach a "final" decision about our scope so we can determine how and if to handle Riordan's new Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard. In my opinion, if we decide on a new scope which covers that series, then we need to begin work on applicable pages for it, since the first book has now been officially published. Do you think this project should become the "Rick Riordan" task-force? I'd appreciate your comment here. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 15:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago12 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Zussman1, sorry it took so long for me to get on this. (Though I noticed a few of your edits, and they've done a lot to help it out already.) I'm working on beefing up the reception section, but I was wondering whether you thought something ought to be done to the one about the plot. What do you think about providing a short summary of each chapter? This would make the article very different from Percy Jackson's Greek Gods, but I'm not sure that's a bad thing. Let me know; If you're willing to wait a little bit, I'd be more than happy to churn out some summaries. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Another quick thing I thought of: How would you feel about removing the characters section entirely, and instead merging it into "Plot", by describing each chapter individually and touching on each character within those sections? I came up with the idea after reading some of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Novels. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 20:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
@2ReinreB2, I think that that's a good idea. I'm just a little busy with school lately, so I'll get to work on some of those soon. I would greatly appreciate your help. Zussman1 (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Just added a plot summary of the first chapter. How do you like it? (It is a little wordy.) If it's good, I can do this for all the chapters and we can scrap the "Characters" section. With better references, I think both the reviewer's issues with the draft will be solved, and you can re-nominate it for admission into the encyclopedia. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 04:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
@2ReinreB2, it's really good. I think that we could make it a little shorter. I'll try to get to work on the rest of them sometime in the next week. Thank you so much for your help! Zussman1 (talk) 19:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hey there, Zussman1. Just a little courtesy notice that a new WP:PJTF member created the page Percy Jackson's Greek Heroes. You should check it out, as well as his/her post here. The task-force will need to decide how to handle merging your draft with his/hers, because yours can no longer pass review unless one of the pages' names is changed. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks! I noticed that he edited the draft page, so perhaps we should choose which page will be used soon. Zussman1 (talk) 02:51, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
It started out as your draft page, so WP:PJTF'll leave it up to you. Personally, I'd consider making the full page a redirect for now and keeping going with the draft. That way, if and when it passes submission, we'll know it's 100% good-to-go. Up to you, let me know if you need help executing whatever you decide. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 22:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
@2ReinreB2: I think that's the best way to proceed. If we would want to use the draft as the real page eventually, wouldn't we need to delete the current page? Zussman1 (talk) 00:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Not sure. I think we could just rename (move) it into a redirect that would help when people search. So, name the page "PJ Heroes" and have it redirect to the actual "Percy Jackson's Greek Heroes" page. Something like that. Let me know if you want me to take care of this redirect, else you can take care of it yourself. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 01:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
@2ReinreB2: I'm not really sure how to do this, so I'd prefer if you do it. Thank you for all of your help! Zussman1 (talk) 01:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Okay, the page is now a redirect. I'm going to hold off on moving it until the draft is finished, as we may not ever need to. Check out Help:Redirect if you ever want to try redirecting on your own. It's fairly simple, but I'm always happy to help. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 23:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your determination and dedication to help the encyclopedia grow. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)
I nominate Editor Zussman1 to be Editor of the Week for their undaunted determination to contribute. This user has been a member for less than a year, and yet has already become one of three absolutely invaluable editors who have triple-handedly revived the Percy Jackson Task-force, inactive for about three years previously. As a task-force contributor, Zussman1 has shown admirable drive and a willingness to cooperate with other users which does him/her great credit. They have completed several tasks requested by the project and asked for no recognition -- yet another praiseworthy point. This editor has also created and/or contributed to several drafts (Draft:Dvore House, for example) and, though they have been declined for submission, has not lost his/her willingness to continue working. Finally, Zussman1 has also displayed a commendable knack for recognizing an area in need of help and devoting themselves to it. While some new Wikipedians flounder, Zussman1 has zeroed-in on an area of focus and explored all the different facets of Wikipedia-editing to improve it: from uploading images and archiving talk pages, to patrolling for vandalism and doing research on sources and references.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}
Congratulations, Zussman1! You deserve it! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 22:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Wow! This is a great surprise! Thank you so much, 2ReinreB2 for the wonderful nomination and Buster Seven for the congratulations. I really appreciate it! Zussman1 (talk) 00:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
One of the benefits of facilitating the Eddy award is that I get to meet quality editors like you. Too many veteran editors spend too much time at the various drama-laden pages of Wikipedia. They rarely take the time to see the hard working editors that fly under the radar of contention and strife and they begin to look at WP as one argument after another. Editors like you are the heartbeat of Wikipedia. Thanks for all you do. Happy New Year. Buster Seven Talk 17:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I plan to be the "Magnus Chase" Expert within the Percy Jackson Task Force. So please don't hesitate on asking any questions relating to the Characters and the Series(Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard). I hope we have a fine time working together to better the information about Rick Riordan's books on Wikipedia. Yaohuijiang (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Disambiguation link notification for November 23edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Red Tequila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Why would you move Percy Jackson's Greek Heroes to that short two lines in Camp Half-Blood chronicles? It doesn't seem very smart to me, or will you upload it when you're finished with the Draft?
@The Pancake of Heaven!: It's currently a redirect, so that when people search for it, they'll see something. When we complete the draft, we'll delete the redirect and link it to the completed page. Zussman1 (talk)
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey there, Zussman1. Noticed you reverted my edit to Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard. No problem, just wanted to explain why I made my change in the first place -- the info that it's a trilogy needs a reference, and there isn't one in the header (that I can see at least). I just wanted to let you know before some other editor comes along and flags for referencing issues, or starts nit-picking other parts of the article. Thanks for reading! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
@2ReinreB2: Sure, no problem. I just found a source stating that it will be a trilogy and will add it right now. Zussman1 (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hey there, Zussman1. I just came across your recent edit and it made me think. I know authors sometimes write reviews and introductions to other authors' novels, but I don't know if that's noteworthy for Wikipedia. Riordan's intro for Tales of the Greek Heroes is a pretty important one, but I think I've read something else that he intro'ed, and I don't know if we should list them all. Maybe we should just mention his Tales into in another section; i.e. a sentence like "He wrote the introduction for the new edition of Tales, a book which had great impact on his life..."? (We could quote in his intro where he says that.) I don't know, what do you think? -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 04:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
@2ReinreB2: I added the introduction after coming across something like it in JK Rowling's page (Publications section). I'm pretty sure that he's also intro'ed for Demigods and Monsters. I think that we should include the introductions and other works that he's written in his page, because some of them are notable and could also bring up the overall level of the page. I don't think reviews should be included, because those are way too numerous to record, not to mention find. To summarize I think we should include forewords/introductions and/or news articles, etc, but not reviews. Zussman1 (talk) 06:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
OK, seems fair to me. I do think we should provide a short description of the Tales one, just because it's so important. Otherwise, I agree completely. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 06:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
2ReinreB2, great, I have a copy on hand. I can add it right now. Zussman1 (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dvore House, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Zussman1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Dvore House".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969TT me 12:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey there! This message is going out to all active members of WP:RRTF. I just found this amazingly useful old template lurking among our pages. I decided to update it and create a new section on our project page that will hopefully inspire some more collaboration between members. Please go check it out, and feel free to contact me or make any improvements you'd like. Happy editing! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 02:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of The Boy Who Knew Everything.jpgedit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Cover of The Boy Who Knew Everything.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hey there, Zussman1. I noticed you've been working on your draft more recently, so I tried to help out a little. But I'm leaving this message because I think we need to decide soon what to do about the chapter summaries. As they are, I think an AFC reviewer would say they're too long, but I don't know what's worth keeping. I'm inclined to trim each one to almost barebones character list, maybe touch on what Percy Jackson identifies as each hero's fatal flaw. But saying "Hercules Does 12 Stupid things" is about Hercules, who has anger issues -- I don't know if a description that short is at all useful.
For now, I'll keep trying to put summaries up there, but at some point they're going to have to be shortened. It's your call what you wan to do, just let me know when you decide, so I can do all the new summaries that way. Thanks, and happy editing! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 22:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@2ReinreB2, I agree that some of the summaries are too long. I think that cutting it down to what you described is slightly excessive. I think we could cut down some of the descriptions a little, but getting them down to a manageable length could be problematic, as each chapter contains a lot of information/plot. Maybe we could describe the main deeds done in each chapter along with the unique spin put on it (i.e. Perseus giving each god a hug) and link to the main page about each hero. That seems as if it could solve both the length and information problems. Thank you so much for all the work you've done on this! I really appreciate it! Zussman1 (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
I like your idea about linking to the heroes' pages -- could we put a see also/main page link there, maybe? The big issue I see is that chapter summaries for books are really rarely done, and are never longer than one paragraph. Usually WP:NV shoots for a mere three sentances. Go ahead and do a section the way you think is best, factoring in all that, and I'll give you my feedback and/or copy for the rest of the sections. Happy editing (fixed the typos). - 2ReinreB2 (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
♦ Hey there, Zussman1! This message represents your invite to the annual WP:RRTF roll-call, August 2016 edition. It's been a year since our last checkup, and all members are being asked to quickly determine whether they wish to stay on for another one. Our current membership options are: Active Member, Supporter, and Inactive Member (see our members page for more information). You are currently listed as an Active Member.Please leave your response to this roll-call here. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 00:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC) ♦ Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hey there, Zussman1. I just wanted to let you know that your old draft on The Sword of Summer is essentially ready to be submitted for AFC review. This needs to be done ASAP, as The Sword of Summer (novel) was already created by someone without knowledge of Wikipedia policies or the existence of the redirect The Sword of Summer. If you don't feel like shepherding the draft through AFC, you can ask another RRTF member to handle it, OR you can simply start pasting text over to The Sword of Summer (novel). If you choose the second option, make sure you respect the contributions of that page's previous authors; don't just delete their work in favor of ours.
This has become really important with the publication of the next Magnus book. Fandalism of our pages is up (again) and we need to start working on a draft for the second book soon, or we'll be back in the same position we've been with The Sword of Summer. I'm not trying to rush or bother you, but it's your draft and I'd prefer to have the go-ahead before we do anything with it. Happy editing, and thanks for reading. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 01:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
@2ReinreB2: I'm so sorry I haven't been working on this. I've been extremely busy lately. I'm giving you (or any other member) permission to do whatever you see fit with both drafts of mine (Sword of Summer and PJ's Greek Heroes). I doubt I'll be able to work on either of them in the next few months. Zussman1 (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
No big deal, Zussman1. I appreciate your getting back to me, and I wish you luck with whatever you're up to. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Zussman1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Annnouncing RRTF's first Edit-A-Thon! In honor of his July 9 birthday, RRTF will be hosting an editing event focused on author/illustrator John Rocco. The event will last until the first day of August, when the most helpful contributor will be featured on RRTF's forums. More information can be found here on the talk page, where you may also post questions and comments (as always). Please consider helping out! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 03:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Sword of Summer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
♦ Hello, {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}! This message represents your invite to the annual Rick Riordan task force roll-call. It has been a year since our last check-in, and all members are being asked to quickly reaffirm their participation. Our membership options are: Active, Supporter, and Inactive (see our members page for more information). You are currently listed as Active.
This event will last until the end of June2024. Any Active member who does not respond within the time window will be listed as Unknown on the task force's member list. The names of Supporters will remain unchanged. Please leave your response to the roll-call on the RRTF forums! We hope to see you around! -- ~~~~ ♦
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Zussman1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, Zussman1. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Wiki-Birthday. You're three! Have a great day! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 19:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Percy Jackson's Greek Heroes, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
♦ Hello, Zussman1! This message represents your invite to the annual Rick Riordan task force roll-call. It has been a year since our last check-in, and all members are being asked to quickly reaffirm their participation. Our membership options are: Active, Supporter, and Inactive (see our members page for more information). You are currently listed as Active.. You listed yourself as semi-retired this year. How should we interpret that going forward?
This event will last until the end of June2024. Any Active member who does not respond within the time window will be listed as Unknown on the task force's member list. The names of Supporters will remain unchanged. Please leave your response to the roll-call on the RRTF forums! We hope to see you around! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 03:10, 6 August 2018 (UTC) ♦ Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Zussman1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Orphaned non-free image File:Doctor Who The Husbands of River Song.jpgedit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who The Husbands of River Song.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Promotional image for Hell Bent.jpgedit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Promotional image for Hell Bent.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Doctor Who The Husbands of River Song.jpgedit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who The Husbands of River Song.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Promotional image for Hell Bent.jpgedit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Promotional image for Hell Bent.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard Logo.jpgedit
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
