Welcome!

edit

Hello, Zlgiancarlo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Nine Lashes. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Zlgiancarlo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Zlgiancarlo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Helios (album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 17:50, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

{{subst:huggle/warn-2|1=Bet U Wish U Had Me Back (song)|2=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bet_U_Wish_U_Had_Me_Back_(song)?diff=616976172" title="Bet U Wish U Had Me Back (song)">Latest revision as of 13:12, July 14, 2014</a> (<a href="/w/index.php?title=Bet_U_Wish_U_Had_Me_Back_(song)&action=edit" title="Bet U Wish U Had Me Back (song)">edit</a>) (<a class="mw-thanks-thank-link" href="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Thanks/616976172" title="Send a thank you notification to this user" data-revision-id="616976172">thank</a>)

<a href="/w/index.php?title=User:Zlgiancarlo&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new mw-userlink" title="User:Zlgiancarlo (page does not exist)">Zlgiancarlo</a> (<a href="/wiki/User_talk:Zlgiancarlo" title="User talk:Zlgiancarlo">talk</a> | <a href="/wiki/Special:Contributions/Zlgiancarlo" title="Special:Contributions/Zlgiancarlo">contribs</a>)
(<a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:AES" class="mw-redirect" title="Wikipedia:AES">←</a>Created page with '
"Zlgiancarlo"
Song

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Bet U Wish U Had Me Back (song) added a link to an image on your computer or on an external website, possibly in an attempt to display that image on the page. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request an upload. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 23:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lowborn may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Infobox album <!-- See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums -->

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 14 July

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Home School Valedictorian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alive (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Skunk (series)

edit

This is already covered at Skunk Fu!. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fix this

edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manafest_discography&curid=36640435&diff=617312238&oldid=610656062 How can you walk away when there's this much mess? Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Watch the Stars Fall

edit
 

The article Watch the Stars Fall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song. I can't find any evidence that song was on Billboard. No refs

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 23:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Flight (Search the City album)

edit
 

The article Flight (Search the City album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album. Hasn't made any charts. No refs

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 23:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Whispers & Memories

edit
 

The article Whispers & Memories has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song. No evidence it was on Billboard. No refs

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 23:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Light the Fire

edit
 

The article Light the Fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable single. No evidence it was on Billboard. No refs

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 23:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Red Discography

edit

Dude seriously, as I said on the edit description I spent a long time researching the singles' chart peaks on Billboard.biz. A lot of stuff I fixed because it was incorrect. Also the 2 singles i removed I never found any archive of them ever charting at all. You keep reverting my edits back to your unsourced chart peak information. Please give me sources for what you claim. Without those sources, your information is staying reverted. Thanks, Jacob102699 (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sky Beyond Time & Darkness the Motion Picture
added links pointing to Rock and Pop
Already Over, Pt. 2
added a link pointing to End of Silence (album)
Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of Time & Darkness
added a link pointing to Zubat

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Cold Summer" at Fuel discography

edit

May I ask what are you doing? First you add four unsourced peak positions for Fuel's latest single "Cold Summer" here. I found no evidence for any of those chart positions from Billboard charts, so I reverted them as a possible edit blunder. Next thing you come back and add another peak position for "Cold Summer" here, and again, without any refs or edit commentary. Here's a direct link to Fuel's Mainstream Rock chart history on Billboard. No "Cold Summer" there. The single's stay at the Mediabase airplay charts didn't indicate a future No. 19 position on Billboard charts anyway. I'd be curious to know if you have any other reliable sources than the Billboard website or Allmusic to support your edits. --Sk4170 (talk) 19:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Millionaires (The Script song)

edit

As seen above, I am contesting your sourcing. I can't find them on the charts that you referenced and am marking the page as having no sources. Asdklf; (talk) 21:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Asdklf;Reply

Nomination of Watch the Stars Fall for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Watch the Stars Fall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watch the Stars Fall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 23:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blood (In This Moment album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivan Moody. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Search the City

edit

Please specify which charts are being added to the table and provide a reference for the chart positions. I have been unable to find evidence that the band has made any major chart. Chubbles (talk) 17:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Chubbles, Zlgiancarlo keeps adding unreferened, non-notable songs/bands faster than I can delete them. If this keeps up much longer, I'll request a block be placed as Zlgiancarlo currently doesn't know or follow rules. Bgwhite (talk) 20:16, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Light the Fire for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Light the Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light the Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 20:13, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mystery of You for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mystery of You is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystery of You until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 20:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Referencing

edit

You have to start referencing the singles you're listing. I can't find sources for "Christian rock" charts. If you can't provide the references, I'll have to nominate them for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Watch the Stars Fall

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Watch the Stars Fall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ twsx | talkcont | ~ 09:07, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Repost of Watch the Stars Fall

edit

  A tag has been placed on Watch the Stars Fall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this:   which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Kolbasz (talk) 15:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Who We Are (Red song)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Who We Are (Red song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Two kinds of pork (talk) 04:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Flight (Search the City album) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flight (Search the City album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flight (Search the City album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 21:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Whispers & Memories (Search the City song) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whispers & Memories (Search the City song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flight (Search the City album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 21:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rewrite the Ending for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rewrite the Ending is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flight (Search the City album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 21:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.

  • Do not add Article's for Deletion (AfD) tags to pages that are not up for deletion. See [1], [2] and [3]
  • Do not recreate articles that have already been delete via AfD as you have done twice at Watch the Stars Fall.
  • Add references to articles. Do not add totally made up references. Any further articles created with verifiable references will be subject to deletion.
  • Any further editting disruption can lead to you being blocked. Bgwhite (talk) 21:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
The issue is that the editor doesn't know how to nominate articles for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Walter Görlitz. No. They are creating articles with the AfD noticed intact. They are attaching the AfD notice to articles created previously by them. Bgwhite (talk) 05:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

You need to add references

edit

Over the past few weeks you created articles for songs that charted, the problem is many of them are not referenced. You need to supply those references now or they will likely be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Once again, stop recreating articles that have been deleted via the AfD process as you did at Light the Fire‎ and Watch the Stars Fall (song). Please stop adding the AfD message to articles. Bgwhite (talk) 05:52, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Light the Fire. --Finngall talk 13:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Moment (Manafest)

edit
 

The article The Moment (Manafest) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not currently meet WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Miracle (Shinedown song)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Miracle (Shinedown song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

the references provided have no mention of the song

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 117.192.160.198 (talk) 14:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Through The Ghost

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Through The Ghost, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

the references provided have no mention of the song

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 117.192.160.198 (talk) 14:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Light the Fire (song)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Light the Fire (song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ twsx | talkcont | ~ 16:02, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
Daniel Case (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

I added a note on Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2014 August 17 because the article, Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of the Sky Beyond Time & Darkness, had text originally from Bulbapedia and was provided without attribution. --gdfusion (talk|contrib) 19:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Release the Panic (song)

edit
 

The article Release the Panic (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 19:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Moment (Manafest) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Moment (Manafest) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Moment (Manafest) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Imaginary Enemy (album), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 02:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

With this edit, you stated "Untraveled Road" was on three charts. Yet, the references given do not back up two of the charts. Bgwhite (talk) 06:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Daniel Case (talk) 15:48, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The One (Tantric song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Martin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Release the Panic (song)

edit
 

The article Release the Panic (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability: article appears to have been re-created after deletion of another article by same editor, same title, which was PRODded on 14 August.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 21:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply


PamD Daniel Case, This song was prodded and deleted, so it is not eligible for another Prod. Zlgiancarlo never adds references and outright lies in articles. "Release the Panic" never was a #1 song on the Billboard Christian rock chart. Three singles from the album did reach #1, "Perfect Life", "Die for You" and "So Far Away". I can't find anything about it reaching the Christian Songs chart, but with the album having the same name, I might have missed something. "Hold Me Now" did reach #40. I've already sent 5-7 articles by Zlgiancarlo to AfD. They were all deleated, all had no references and all had lies on where the song/album charted. This looks like another case for AfD.
He has just created Forever (Red song), which was deleted at AfD. It too has no refs and invalid claims. Bgwhite (talk) 23:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mystery of You

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mystery of You, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:40, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Forever (Red song)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Forever (Red song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Millionaires (The Script song) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Millionaires (The Script song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millionaires (The Script song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 18:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Disruptive editing: repeatedly adding unsourced information and recreating deleted articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bgwhite (talk) 20:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Release the Panic: Recalibrated for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Release the Panic: Recalibrated is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Release the Panic: Recalibrated until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Demon Hunter discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There are two references associated with the changes you made http://www.billboard.com/artist/300746/demon-hunter/chart?f=355 and http://www.billboard.com/artist/300746/demon-hunter/chart?f=1095

Let's look at "My Heartstrings Come Undone". You changed it to charting in 15th position for the first chart. I don't see that. Apparently you state that "Undying" charted at No. 1 on the second chart. I really don't see that.

You were blocked in the past, in part, for "repeatedly adding unsourced information". Is this going to change? Feel free to add the information back with references, ideally accessible references. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of A Fire So Big The Heavens Can See It (album) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Fire So Big The Heavens Can See It (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Fire So Big The Heavens Can See It (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guerillero | My Talk 17:47, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Daughtry discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

edit

Hello Zlgiancarlo,

I am conducting research about newcomers to Wikipedia and I was hoping to ask you some questions. I’ve noticed you’ve had some good activity recently. Is there any chance you have time in the next month to speak with me? If you are interested or have any questions, please email me at gmugar [at] syr.edu or leave a message on my talk page.

I hope to be in touch soon,

Gabrielm199 (talk) 04:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 17 December

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited We as Human, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Cooper. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Familiar Taste of Poison

edit
 

The article Familiar Taste of Poison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence to indicate notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — kikichugirl speak up! 09:51, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cadillac, Cadillac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Stars (Sixx:A.M. song)

edit
 

The article Stars (Sixx:A.M. song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 20:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Can You Save Me
added a link pointing to Gavin Brown
Incomplete (Hoobastank song)
added a link pointing to Gavin Brown
This Is Gonna Hurt (Hoobastank song)
added a link pointing to Gavin Brown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2015

edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Daughtry discography. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Hzh (talk) 14:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of An Island

edit
 

The article An Island has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 15:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Can You Save Me

edit
 

The article Can You Save Me has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, no references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 12:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Million Miles (Fuel song)

edit

Hello Zlgiancarlo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Million Miles (Fuel song) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Abbottonian (talk) 13:39, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply