Welcome edit

Hello Zara565 and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Български | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Lietuvių | 한국어 | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Suomi | Svenska | Türkçe | 简体中文 | The main embassy page edit

  Getting Started
  Getting help
  The Commmunity
  Policies and Guidelines
  Things to do

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 00:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of The Kidnapping of Michaela Garecht edit

I have nominated The Kidnapping of Michaela Garecht, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kidnapping of Michaela Garecht. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ukexpat (talk) 00:39, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your message on my talk page. Please make your comments in the deletion discussion so that they can be considered by the reviewing admin.  – ukexpat (talk) 15:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Michaela565.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Michaela565.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 04:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

November 2009 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to The Kidnapping of Michaela Garecht. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page File:Michaela565.jpg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 4twenty42o (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Michaela, Age 9.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Michaela, Age 9.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MilborneOne (talk) 20:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Michaela565.jpg edit

I have changed the information on the image to show it is copyrighted and used under fair use. I have added a rationale which needs to explain why it is being used, I have filled some of it in but you might want to complete it as you know more about the subject. MilborneOne (talk) 20:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Zara565/new article name here edit

User:Zara565/new article name here, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zara565/new article name here and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Zara565/new article name here during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 13:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Michaela565.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Michaela565.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Michaela.jpeg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Michaela.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply