User talk:Zagalejo/Archive 13

So long

So long, Zag. I'll pick up the slack :P DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

No doubt, hope to see you active again some time. DaHuzyBru (talk) 04:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Hope to see you back soon . . .

Your absence has been felt . . . hope you can come back from your wikibreak feeling refreshed and reinvigorated. — Myasuda (talk) 23:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: Bill Russell

This is a note to let the main editors of Bill Russell know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on February 12, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 12, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Bill Russell (born 1934) is a retired American professional basketball player, widely considered one of the best in National Basketball Association (NBA) history. Playing center for the Boston Celtics, he was the centerpiece of their dynasty and his shot-blocking and man-to-man defense were major reasons for the team's success. A five-time NBA Most Valuable Player and a twelve-time All-Star, he won 11 NBA championships during his 13-year career, and jointly holds the record for the most championships won by an athlete in a North American sports league. He led the NBA in rebounds four times, and remains second all-time in both total rebounds and rebounds per game. Russell was the first African American player to achieve superstar status in the NBA and the first African American NBA coach. For his accomplishments in the Civil Rights Movement on and off the court, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2011. Russell is a member of three basketball Halls of Fame (Naismith Memorial, National Collegiate, and FIBA) and the NBA Finals Most Valuable Player Award is named in his honor. He also won a 1956 Olympics gold medal as captain of the U.S. national basketball team. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The NBA WikiProject Barnstar
		Thank for your past edits on many wikipedia articles concerning NBA players. It is much appreciated.

Robert4565 (talk) 19:26, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Loyola University Chicago athletics logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loyola University Chicago athletics logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan^(talk) 19:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Happy adminship anniversary!!!

Wishing Zagalejo a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Anastasia (talk) 16:34, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Devine

Please refrain from changing Richard Devine's Wikipedia page to omit his part in the torture and abuse of over a hundred men. If all you want are cites, I will come back and edit it with 100's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judeic12 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Putting this here for now...

[1] Zagalejo^^^ 15:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

"Controversies" and "Doping" edits to Dimitris Melissanidis and Ioannis Bourousis

Can you help me out with this? I am having this discussion with the user Partoni about his edits to these articles, mainly the one at Ioannis Bourousis, but also the edits at Melissanidis are of the same nature, and how they to me are inappropriate. Another editor, Wikimedit, seems to have also had the same issue with him over the edits at the Melissanidis article for awhile now, only he seems to have been getting warned about vandalism at his talk page and not to be removing the edits by mods. Even though those edits don't seem really all that appropriate. So I don't want to get into any edit war or anything because of course that's against site rules, but also because it looks like Partoni is quick to report someone who removes his edits. Basically, he is making edits to these articles that are very accusatory against these individuals, of things they were being accused of in the media awhile ago, and that were proven to be false and untrue, and he is editing the articles to make it appear as if they were true. And he is linking sources that makes it look that way, since there are a lot of sources that were simply reporting the accusations from that time. I have tried to discuss this with the editor, but they don't seem to want to discuss this. I tried to make some compromise edits, leaving the edits, but changing the wording, so as not to word it to look like Bourousis was guilty of doping, when he was not, and even leaving the sources, and they edited it back to show things that were later proven to be nonsense through an official investigation. The user Wikimedit also explained in the edit history of the Melissanidis page that those edits were controversial because that stuff had been disproved in court and so forth, but then the edits got put right back. Both of these guys are connected to AEK Athens club, which is a rival of Panathinaikos club, Bourousis also to Olympiacos club, which is also a rival to Panathinaikos club. So I am wondering if their might be some kind of Panathinaikos fan driven bias here. I don't want to make any accusations, but these kinds of edits look possibly agenda driven to me to be honest about it. So I think we need to have a discussion on this, and I would like your input on this. I already have been discussing it with Partoni like I said, and I also sent a message to Wikimedit about it too. I would appreciate your help and input with this.Bluesangrel (talk) 23:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Well, let me give you an example. If a player is found to be "doping", in Europe, which includes both testing and evidence, such as being caught on tape "buying dope", they are suspended by WADA for 2-4 years depending on how WADA judges the severity of the issue. Bourousis has never ever been suspended. According to the claims being made on his article, he was caught doping and buying drugs on tape by the government. That would be an automatic 2-4 year suspension by WADA. He never missed a single game in his entire career for a drug suspension. Simple facts like that alone is enough to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt how ridiculous and absurd these edits are and that they all of these accusations are to these that were proven to be false accusations and that he was exonerated of any such claims of any of that. Any rational person would know that and I think that alone should be enough for the standard of the site, along with that he volunteered and passed the WADA tests. If any of that was true, that he was caught buying PEDs on tape by the government, he would be suspended 2-4 years by WADA. They do not give any allowance of any kind. There is zero tolerance for anyone of such issues. And that would be a slam dunk and absolute shut case as far as they concern it. It is automatic ban for anything like that. Yet he never in his career has been suspended for even one single game. So edits like that where none of that is even clarified, and instead absolutely go out of their way to imply he doped, bought PEDs, etc and all of that, certainly seem way out of bounds to me.Bluesangrel (talk) 00:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

WADA does not publish when someone passes a test only when they fail a test. I remember it was said that he had to clear his name because of this and volunteered to WADA and he passed the tests. This was years ago so I would have absolutely no idea where to even begin to look for that. Looking for sources of such obscure stuff like that in Greek is much harder than it is in English. What I am explaining is that all athletes are immediately banned for 2-4 years if they are caught on tape by the government buying PEDs. In fact, that is most likely a lifetime ban from the sport. Bourousis was never banned for even a single game. I don't understand why this is even a debate to be honest. Maybe we should discuss with someone that edits in WADA article or someone that edits in football or cycling or Olympic articles or something like that. Because the edits as claimed are simply an impossibility. That is all I am saying. It is nothing like the NBA, where the NBA itself is in charge of the drug policies. WADA is in charge of all the drug policies in Europe for the athletes, and such a situation, if it was true, would be actually, probably a lifetime ban for the player. Yet again, he never has been suspended in his career for even one single game. I think maybe the correct burden of proof here would be for anyone to provide a source showing where he has been suspended for even once game in his career due to a PED suspension. So maybe we should as someone that edits in like I don't know maybe Lance Armstrong articles, or maybe something like this? I am not an expert or anything close to it at all in this topic, so I need more info here, but I know for sure that the edits as they are made are wrong. If a player will get even a very minor drug situation in Europe he is immediately suspended for 2 years, and this stuff being said of Bourousis is extreme. And again, they are claiming Greek League did not test which is a nonsense, because it has no bearing. Euroleague tests also the whole year, so that does not matter and as I said testing does not even matter itself, simple evidence counts, such as being caught on tape buying PEDs. It would be automatic suspension by WADA. Players gets suspended for much less than this. Those edits really should be removed. It is as I said the same as the edits he made at the other article. Could you try talk to the other editor Wikimedit? He seems like he knows the same issue from the edits Partoni was making to the Dimitris Melissanidis article. I think you should try talk to that editor just to get an idea here. I tried to talk to him but have not got a response back yet. Maybe you can get one back.Bluesangrel (talk) 21:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Well this is a very hard issue, since there just won't be sources for this readily available I think without directly contacting WADA about it. I will ask a very knowledgeable editor that edits a lot in the Greek wiki for his opinion on it and to discuss it with us. Would that be OK?Bluesangrel (talk) 00:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes, that article confirms that he did in fact volunteer for drug tests at the time because of this and that he did pass them, which allowed him to play in the both the Italian League (which also tests) and in FIBA (which of course tests) with the Greek national team, and it also mentions, as I said, that the Euroleague also tested during that season, even though the Greek league did not, so the statements that there was no testing in the Greek League is a bit pointless, because he also played in Euroleague, and you get tested by both leagues, not just the domestic league. The article also points out as I said, that indeed it was talking about "medicines" and there was laughing and joking and it was never explicitly verified or proven what was being talked about, nor was there ever any such proof of anything such as "being caught on tape buying dope", or any of these such allegations as it is framed that way. Only that was indeed all speculation. It was all speculation. There was no such thing as being caught on tape buying dope, only people in the media speculating that was what it was. There was also no failed doping test, or doping suspension, only media claiming that, just as I said. So yes, that article confirms what I was saying. It also is like I told you, as that article comes from Italian media, that also this how it is very hard to even see this info from Greek media showing how it was all proven as speculation. But that all the accusations still are easy to find. Because as I said, the journalists reported the stuff are basically pro Panathinaikos journalists, which of course Bourousis was a logical target for them, since he is a well-known AEK and Olympiacos player, and those are the two huge rivals really of Panathinaikos. Unfortunately, that is how much of the sports reporting goes in Greece. So to even get basic confirmation and clarification on the stuff it is no surprise that Italian media was needed. So the question is now then, how should I properly edit this? I have concerns, because I think Partoni is going to come back and change the edits back again, because they did that before more than once already when I changed them, and I won't want to get into an edit war.Bluesangrel (talk) 23:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

I searched some more through Greek media and I found a source showing Bourousis was cleared of the charges and did submit to drug tests and passed them in Greek media. This source states that the entity that is in control of monitoring the doping of the Greek national athletes, so in this case Greek national team ordered for Bourousis to submit to doping control after these reports came out. A couple of weeks later the results of the tests came out and they were clean and he was cleared then to play with the Greek national team. For a reference point, this doping control entity has to send all of their samples to also be tested by WADA, and that is why they have to wait for the results to come back. Here is the Greek source for verification [2] Bluesangrel (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

I never said it had to be removed, I even allowed the section before, I just said the edits had to be removed as they were in the manner as Partoni is making them. Partoni is making them to appear that Bourousis was caught on tape buying dope and was suspended for buying dope, and all this other stuff, which none of that was true at all. And the problem is, you can make edits to Wikipedia like that when they are untrue. And also that like I said before, if I tried to edit it, and talk to him about it, not even remove it, just explain it, he reverted it back. And when I tried to discuss it with Partoni, they claimed the issue was true in the way they edited it. I will try to edit it as best I see is realistic, but I have a feeling Partoni will edit it back. Maybe they won't though if I put these sources in though. It's just that I explained all that before in my discussion with them, and they simply said I was wrong about it all and it did not know how it happened and that Bourousis was guilty of everything basically.Bluesangrel (talk) 01:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

OK I edited it and I tried to make it reflect the issue as it happened as he was accused and as he was cleared. I also tried to update the article and to make it look more professional as it was not looking so encyclopedic. I didn't think we really needed separate sections with titles like doping controversy and chair to the head so I just added them within the article. And as I said I updated the article also as it seemed it had not been updated in a year or so.Bluesangrel (talk) 22:57, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Protection

Old same issue. IPs constantly re-add before-1992 results to the Serbia national basketball team.--AirWolf ^talk 07:38, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

List of National Basketball Association players (W–Z) → Mike Wallace?

Hey Zag, I removed removed "Mike Wallace (basketball)" from List of National Basketball Association players (W–Z) because that player doesn't exist on basketball-reference.com as a former ABA, NBA, or even NBL player. I had thought that a vandal named Mike Wallace may have added himself onto the list but I see where you had included him in the article's original version. I'm wondering where you got information that a player named Mike Wallace existed? If I'm wrong, please correct me and show me a reference, but I'm just confused where that info came from. Thanks! Jrcla2 (talk) 14:34, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiBreak?

Zags, are you going to remove that WikiBreak template any time soon? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 00:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Invitation for a discussion: Serbia national basketball team

Hey, I would like to invite you for a discussion here: Final disscussion: Results/medals history. Please, participate.--AirWolf ^talk 13:35, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Anita Padilla listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anita Padilla. Since you had some involvement with the Anita Padilla redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Marchjuly (talk) 03:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anita Padilla

The article Anita Padilla has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Dick Klein (basketball)

When you created Dick Klein (basketball) back in 2006, you added it in with a number of "ibid" references. As you can imagine, ibids are not helpful as a reference and create more complications for others to edit. Rather than trying to guess, do you know what the ibids were referring to there? You include separate references for Sachare and Hirsley so it could be the Tribune piece but I doubt that was a multi-page piece so I don't know. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I just spend all that time with Lewis and Clark Centennial Exposition and that required a mangled mess of work (someone used a library call reference number as their convention)(!). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, Zags!

And may all your days be merry and bright . . . Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Glad to see

Your edits at lambs farm article. Please have a look in, at the edit I added as a note to two sources, to soften the jarring appearance of a term in those two article titles. Reply here? And let me know, if you please, if you are at all local to that charity, as we are. More later, incl. login. 50.179.252.14 (talk) 17:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Those notes look fine to me. The headlines are certainly a product of their times. Thanks! I'm in Chicago. Zagalejo^^^ 23:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Actually, are you the same person as User:50.179.194.186? I was just curious about the change from Libertyville to Lake Bluff. I always thought Lambs Farm was in Libertyville, and that's what they list as their address. However, their publications also use the phrase "near Libertyville". Zagalejo^^^ 23:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Zagalejo. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Zagalejo.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zagalejo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

What are your thoughts on this?

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 9#Template:Slovenia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship

Speedy deletion nomination of London Parliament (Monet painting)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on London Parliament (Monet painting) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions}) 15:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Unprotection/Protection request for Ricky Rubio

I haven't seen any racist vandalism for a while on this article, which is the reason you described for putting this article on Pending Changes. Would it be possible to either remove the Pending Changes or at best replace it with semi-protection on the grounds of persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content? The only disruption I see on the article is mostly the unsourced changes to the infobox. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 19:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User: Zagalejo|Zagal<font color="green">e</font>jo]]'''[[User talk:Zagalejo|^^^]]''': Zagalejo^^^

to

[[User: Zagalejo|Zagal<span style="color: green;">e</span>jo]]'''[[User talk:Zagalejo|^^^]]''': Zagalejo^^^

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 22:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)