Your submission at Articles for creation: Nucleolus (disambiguation) (November 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Yuxb! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Yuxb. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

See also Citing yourself. S0091 (talk) 16:30, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nucleolus (Game Theory) (November 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 01:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
May I ask why you think these are the primary sources? The concept of nucleolus was first defined in Schmeidler (1969) and the studied by various researchers, just to name a few, Bezalel Peleg and Kopelowitz (1967), Isbell (1959), Sudholter (1996) and Kaminski (2000) and Aumann-Maschler-Zamir is a textbook that synthesized all the conceptual development and appear to be a perfect secondary source. So, I am confused why you are saying these are primary sources. And what, if possible, would be a secondary source? Yuxb (talk) 01:52, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Pinging @Stuartyeates. Yuxb, editors are very unlikely to see messages here unless you ping them. An alternatives is to go to their talk page (click "talk" by the signature and that will take you to that's editor's talk page). S0091 (talk) 15:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks S0091. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
The canonical secondary source in academia is the review article. Also acceptable (usually) are peer reviewed articles by those unconnected to original authors which mention the subject in the title of the article. Note that the researchers you name above are actually listed in the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Nucleolus (Game Theory) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nucleolus (Game Theory). Thanks! Felix QW (talk) 19:05, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nucleolus (Game Theory) (November 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Felix QW was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Felix QW (talk) 10:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Nucleolus (disambiguation)

edit

  Hello, Yuxb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nucleolus (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Nucleolus (disambiguation)

edit
 

Hello, Yuxb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nucleolus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:23, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Nucleolus (Game Theory)

edit

  Hello, Yuxb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nucleolus (Game Theory), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:21, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply