User talk:YumeChaser/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Singles vs EPs

I know you follow WP:NSONGS for premature singles, but I thought it was strange to treat some of them as songs, as they are more like albums (or at least EP's) than songs. In fact, iTunes often treats them as EPs. Take the Sunrise/Sunset single by Hamasaki. It's clearly not just a song. Anyways, I took it to the discussion page of WP:NSONGS, and I figured you'd want to put in your input. Also, I salute you for your diligence with keeping these pages. We're lucky to have you. Glaexeaus (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

A "song" per Wikipedia Music is a non-single or a B-side, see here I don't know why but it is. It doesn't matter what iTunes treat it as because iTunes treats mostly everything with more than one song as an EP. We can't treat them as an album or an EP because they weren't released as such. If the artist releases it as an EP or an album, then and only then and we say "okay the page can stay since the released date and track list has been confirmed". Another issue with the page is the lack of sources the page can't stay as a stand alone with one source saying it exists. Yes, "Sunrise/Sunset" is a single and people call songs singles. Which is mostly likely why they have it under WP:NSONGS. MS (Talk|Contributions) 16:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Brexx

javascript:delink_dates_to_dmy_and_common_terms() Hey!

Sorry about not replying yesterday, I went off-line for the day just a few minutes before you sent me that message.

Anyways, I concur with Nishkid, that was a nice catch. I'm usually pretty good at picking out Brexx socks from a mile away so feel free to ask for a second opinion if you come across any more.

Thanks! Big Bird (talk • contribs) 12:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Yuna Ito

Where is the source about Yuna Ito = Korean ??? --Kookyunii (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me that it needed a source. Now it is sourced from a reliable source, I should add. MS (Talk|Contributions) 18:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Don't Dare to Warn me discourteously before you find the detailed reason of the situation. Observe the proprieties. Your words and actions often made me displeased. -- Kookyunii (talk) 19:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

It's actually a KNOWN fact that she is Korean, so a source IS not needed. A quick Google check would have told you that a it would have came from a reliable source too. But after someone else removed the categories that I got the source. I haven't said anything negative to you before and I don't plan on starting. As for my actions, I am just following the rules. So sorry if they displease you. MS (Talk|Contributions) 19:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

She Wolf

In that case, I'll remove the template. Admc2006 (talk) 05:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Nami Tamaki - Negai Boshi

Okay, sometimes the name of the song isn't completely in the chorus, and sometimes it is. I don't understand why you're saying it's Negai Hoshi. There have been other songs with the same kanji, and it's been Negai Boshi. Hoshi is never used, please be more precise at least, 'cause it makes more sense to just call it Negai Boshi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuubari (talk • contribs) 06:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

I have reported you for violation the three revert rule. I asked you to discuss the problem not once but twice. You should have done so after I asked you the first time. Now onto Negai H/Boshi, if you knew a bit of Japanese you'd the kanji 星 means Hoshi and not Bōshi (某氏). Anyway, I'm going to redirect the page to Friends! seeing how the article fails both WP:NSONGS and WP:N. Have fun editing and don't leave a reply here, it makes no sense since I have already reported you. Also, I'll just remove it since you didn't want to talk it out when I asked you to. MS (Talk|Contributions) 06:42, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Last Friends

An article isn't supposed to be in both Category:Japanese television dramas and Category:Drama television series at the same time; the Japanese category is already a subcategory of the general one. Unfortunately, HotCat doesn't offer the ability to explain why a category is being added or removed. Bearcat (talk) 06:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of honorific titles in popular music (2nd nomination)

As one of the largest contributor to this article, I wanted to let you know that the article is currently up for deletion. Ikip (talk) 19:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

TVXQ

Can you give me a good reason why I can't add the Guinness World Records part on the TVXQ article besides saying that it's trivial? It's pretty noticeable to be listed in the book. Even the world's tallest man has an article on Wikipedia because of that. Someone963852 (talk) 00:45, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I didn't say that it was just trivial read the edit summary again, I believe there was more than just "Remove for being trivial". Having the most number-one singles for a foreign artist in Japan is an achievement, having the largest fanclub and the most pictures taken are not. The record holds no importance whatsoever. So what they got the largest fanclub and the most pictures taken. What importance does that have to the article? None, all of that is basically a fun fact. And I don't see you are bringing up the world's tallest man here, because TVXQ's article doesn't exist because of the Guinness World Record. MS (Talk|Contributions) 01:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, it doesn't matter how many pictures they have taken or how big their fan club is, but being in the Guinness World Records is definitely a big accomplishment. As for the tallest man thing, that was just an example of how an average person would become well known because of their record. A few even have their own article on Wikipedia, even though it's just a few sentences short and that Wikipedia is not a record book.. ([1][2]) I'll leave it for now to avoid edit-warring but I'm still not impressed or even persuaded one bit by your response. Someone963852 (talk) 01:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Look who's talking.

You already broke the 3-revert-rule on TVXQ by reverting my edit. You're just lucky no one reported you yet. [3][4][5]Someone963852 (talk) 22:59, 15 August 2009 (UTC) I didn't revert your edit I removed it. THEN I reverted your edits. MS (Talk|Contributions) 00:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:BonesS1.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BonesS1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 10:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Touch Me!

On August 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Touch Me!, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

OK

Would U like to participate in the That's Where You Take Me deletion nomination Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/That's_Where_You_Take_Me_(2nd_nomination) ?? --PlatinumFire 20:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

OBI

he is a real person. I personally live in Japan and have seen him multiple times on TV along with his cousin Crystal Kay. There are some Japanese sites that talk about him. please look at those. thankyou —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.198.70.225 (talk) 23:17, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

I did Google searches and searched Japanese sites. There is no proof that "OBI" is real. If you can provide proof that shows that he is real then present it here. MS (Talk|Contributions) 03:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

(can't remember if I had replied to you sorry >_<)

Sorry about the talk page being littered with forum-style topics. It won't happen again. If I have any further questions about TVXQ I'll just ask you if it's ok with you.

~Garfield Turtle Anime~ (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC) Hajiru

Kumi Koda : What type of vandalism?

Verifiability issue - Cleared

OR issue - Cleared

BLP issue - Cleared

Please explain it before reverting the edit.

- 218.222.47.61 (talk) 02:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

NONE of those three are "cleared'. I did a Google search is nothing you add as a "quote" was found. So WP:V, WP:OR AND WP:BLP is still an issue. I honestly doubt she would say, "because I was fat like now, short like now, ugly like now , yet not slutty like now" about her self. You are adding in a libel statement that you CANNOT and HAVE NOT proved. MS (Talk|Contributions) 03:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

meaningless

What does "obtrude" mean when used this way? If you want to add that text, then take it to talk, and get a consensus as to what it is supposed to mean, and how to say it. Don't just keep placing unclear text into the article. I took it out rather than fix it because I have no idea how to fix it.—Kww(talk) 12:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

reverting my edit

DO NOT revert my edits. It was added to the comments page because I am curious about why the release dates are so different. It's important. Just like it's important that you list all the tracks, explain the meaning of any titles, etc. Wikipedia is not censored so if you removed my comments because I mentioned downloading songs then shame on you. Do not revert my edits again.--217.203.157.248 (talk) 18:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Your comment wasn't removed because you mentioned you downloaded the album. It was removed per WP:NOTAFORUM the talk isn't a place for you to talk about why the release dates are weird, where people download movies and music from nor is it a place for you to whine about how the music industry is destroying itself and is run by morons. The talk is suppose to be used for editors to discuss changes to the article. And if you don't want your edits reverted them simply don't edit. It says that on the bottom before you press "save page". MS (Talk|Contributions) 19:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Boshi

Hi, I was just wondering about your statement, "we do not go by the pronunciation we go by the romanization which is Hoshi." on the Negai Boshi former article. Given that rendaku is commonly rendered in Japanese articles as a voiced consonant in both the English Wikipedia and the Japanese one, are you implying that we change Kanagawa to Kanakawa, Yasuo Fukuda to Yasuo Fukuta and all references to nigirizushi to nigirisushi? I'm a little confused. --Prosperosity (talk) 06:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Kanagawa and Yasuo Fukuda stay as they are because there are plenty of reliable sources that allows them to retain those names. As for the references on Sushi, I don't see what this has to do with the title of the article. But if there are reliable sources that lists it at nigirizushi then nigirizushi it is. The only way the articles would be titled as Kanakawa, Yasuo Fukuta, and nigirisushi is if there weren't any reliable sources to back up the names. Which is the case in "Negai Boshi", there are no reliable sources that suggest or say that the title is "Negai Boshi" so we have to go by "Negai Hoshi". MS (Talk|Contributions) 13:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

ネガイボシ, ネガイボシ, ネガイボシ, ネガイボシ, ネガイボシアイウィッシュアポンアスター, ネガイボシカナイボシ, ネガイボシカナイボシ

There's a consensus on the rendaku rendering in the ClubDAM karaoke database (as I'd linked to in the article before linking it back). Every song which begins with 願い星 is pronounced Negai Boshi. What makes Nami's version different? --Prosperosity (talk) 05:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

A karaoke database isn't a reliable source. MS (Talk|Contributions) 05:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Why isn't it? It's as reliable as any other music site fed with information by record companies, such as official sites or news websites. Songs have to have their kana-based transcriptions sent to such companies or else, y'know, the wrong lyrics will appear and people will get frustrated. --Prosperosity (talk) 07:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

The transliteration always follows the pronunciation. Just because the kanji 星 is usually read as "hoshi" does not mean that 願い星 would be read as "Negai Hoshi". Putting the text into an online romanization engine, reveals "negai boshi" and the lyrics of the song found here (with furigana) reveal the pronunciation of "negai boshi", which is how it should be parsed on the English Wikipedia (to read the broken text, you can use this tool).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

2008 Oricon singles

Thank you for getting the right link. You made another mistake which I corrected ("Yowamushi Santa" in the place of "Shuchishin" for the #5 selling single of the year).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

The ellipsis

When encoding text in Japanese, the ellipsis is automatically aligned with the middle line of the text. That means "…" will show up as "…" when encoded in Japanese (or in Chinese as "…" or in Korean as "…") and there is no need to use "・・・" or "···" to match the formatting.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

しない

It's romanized as "shinai", not "shin'ai". しんあい would be "shin'ai", which is how 深愛 would be written, but you are right that it is two words so the page should be at "Shin Ai".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Song subtitles

Song subtitles are always parsed in between parentheses and not between a colon. And just because WP:MOS-JA has one example being used as both (that is an album, which would use the colon as a subtitle) does not mean you should revert everything I just did.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Can you show me where song subtitles are "always parsed in between parentheses". I reverted them because there was a guideline that shows how to deal with song subtitles whereas you just moved them stating "song subtitles in parentheses". MS (Talk|Contributions) 09:46, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

(Don't Fear) The Reaper, (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction, and Rocket Man (I Think It's Going to Be a Long, Long Time) are all examples of songs with subtitles where the subtitle is parsed in parentheses. This is just how subtitles are treated when part of a song title. The Japanese don't use parentheses but instead use the tildes/wavy lines. Albums (Early Days: Best of Led Zeppelin Volume One), movies (Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope), and television shows (Bishōjo Celebrity Panchanne: The Wife is a Superheroine!) use colons. By your opinion, the instrumental tracks on "Hatenaki Michi" should be written in English as "Song Title: Instrumental".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:53, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Also, sometimes the tildes are used to show the proper pronunciation of the song title, like the B-side of Setsugetsuka (The End of Silence).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

I have begun a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)#Song subtitles so the guideline can be clarified for cases of song titles.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the examples, but can you provide a guideline that says the same? And I've seen the discussion you have started. MS (Talk|Contributions) 10:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Well it's not really a guideline but just the standard practice when it comes to songs that have subtitles. There's no guideline that states that this is what is done, because it is just how the English speaking musical community has treated songs that do have subtitles. The Rolling Stones, Blue Oyster Cult, Elton John, and others that have written song titles with song subtitles parse it as such.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:19, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Namie Amuro

Please don't blatantly revert my entire edit of Namie Amuro without looking over the other changes first, as I had made other legitimate modifications on it. Eugeniu Bmsg 03:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

I saw the other edits. You changed some of the <br> to <br />, I thought I had fix it to the changes you made before I save the page. MS (Talk|Contributions) 03:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Tomomi Hirano

Hello MS, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Tomomi Hirano - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know.  Skomorokh, barbarian  07:07, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of My Girl (Arashi song)

Hello! Your submission of My Girl (Arashi song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 12:44, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Beast & MBLAQ

Hey, I've noticed that you keep on deleting the members section in the Beast page yet have never deleted the members sections on the MBLAQ page. Just out of curiosity, Under what criteria do you consider that a member section should be removed? ^N_P^e_e^e_r^b_v^s_e^s_z (Push) 08:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

To be honesty, I don't even remember the last time I made an edit to the MBLAQ page and I'm not even sure if when I edited that page I made an edit that pertained to the member section. In the case of Beast, the member section has no importance to the article since there is no information on them other than the members birth place, education, and blood type. Also the rest of the information added such as whatever minor appearance they made is not important to the article as it does not have anything to do with the group as a whole. There really isn't a criteria that says "remove member sections", however; all the information added is trivia and it is unsourced and if it is sourced, the sources do not meet Wikipedia's standards of what a reliable source should be. MS (Talk|Contributions) 12:43, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for My Girl (Arashi song)

On November 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article My Girl (Arashi song), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:14, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Reflist

Where does it say that {{reflist}} can only be used when there are 10 or more references in an article? Thanks. Eugeniu B +1-contribs- 00:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

I was told by a user last year that {{reflist}} should not be used unless there are ten or more references. However, WP:FOOTNOTES says the decision between using </references> and {{reflist}} is a matter of style and does not have a rule. So I guess either is fine. 01:08, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Alright then, I'll change it to it's original form. Eugeniu B +1 23:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Chance!

Mind telling me what I did wrong? I am new. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ForteGS (talk • contribs) 04:15, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

You didn't do anything wrong. Since you are new, you probably do not know the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. The problem with the "Chance!" article is that you added in original research, you didn't cite any sources and you add the lyrics which are against WP:SONGS. You also moved "Chance!" to "CHANCE!", which is goes against Wikipedia's capitalization guideline and the Japanese manual of style. MS (Talk|Contributions) 06:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Setsugetsuka

This name is taken directly from the CD cover.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Well this is weird. The standard edition cover has "Setsugetsuka", but the limited edition cover has "Setsugekka" ([6]).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

That is weird. Which one do you propose should be used? MS (Talk|Contributions) 02:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Tildes

Sometimes what is between the tildes in the title of a Japanese song/album is actually the intended spelling/pronunciation of the word. In the case of "Sekirei ~seki-ray~", it should be "Seki-Ray" per MOS:J and not "Sekirei (Seki-Ray)".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

hiie, can you stop removing all rewards?!

i bet big bang, tvxq , 2pm, snsd, all bands has got rewards!!!!! if your removing , at least come with reasons, if you want to go for editing war, i will go for it. Nicky456 (talk) 03:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Did you not read the edit summary? And read about edit warring. MS (Talk|Contributions) 03:36, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

okay since you said im wrong

im gona give you reference!! and you do it yourselve alright?

[COPYRIGHT] doojoon featured in danbi (tv show)

About one member in the group. So it does not belong in the article which is about the group. MS (Talk|Contributions) 04:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

[COPYRIGHT] b2st documentary (tv show)

Already covered in the article. Does not need a section. MS (Talk|Contributions) 04:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

for the discography, why are you removing? its the fact they have that album , their first mv is already out, check [COPYRIGHT] (credits to allkpop for uploading

A discography section is not needed when an artist only released one thing. In their case, a mini-album. That is already covered in the paragraph. MS (Talk|Contributions) 04:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

rookie award :

[Newsen Kim Hyung Woo Reporter]

BEAST was decided as the recipient of the Rookie Music Award for the month of December, an award sponsored by Korea’s Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism and managed by the Korea Creative Content Agency.

For the award, the Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism and the Korea Creative Content Agency look at the quality of the album and the variety of the songs, and they present the award in order to reach a balance in the music industry. BEAST was selected as the recipient of the award for December. The award ceremony is on December 2 at the Seoul SangAmDong Korea Create Content Agency.

BEAST is also having their first fan signing since their debut in October. BEAST’s fan signing will take place on November 28 at the Kang Nam location Hot Tracks. The fan signing is also attracting attention as the first event where Yoon Doojoon will able to greet his fans after being in Africa filming for MBC ‘Sunday Sunday Night.’

Regarding their first fan signing, the members said, “We’re nervous. In the future, we would like to go wherever our fans are.”

with reference to http://www.newsen.com/news_view.php?uid=200911271608061002 , translate by illuminate.@B2ST Rising

This can be added back to the article now that there is a source. MS (Talk|Contributions) 04:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

for all the members, when you reverted... you even gave the wrong name!!! please soul, im not going a war with you, but you yourself deleted everything of which is a work from a fan of those band

I didn't give them the wrong name. See their official site. That is how their names are romanized. MS (Talk|Contributions) 04:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

check : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS501 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4minute http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2PM

i did the whole wiki with reference to at least these three or even big bang and dbsk, please at least if you want to remove something, please give a reason??! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicky456 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC) Nicky456 (talk) 03:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Those three are not good articles so those would not be the ones you would want to follow as an example. TVXQ, however, is a good article which means you should follow the example of that article. And once again did you read the edit summary? I stated my reasons there. MS (Talk|Contributions) 04:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

As for beast fanname

i did have an article for it, okay i dont know where is the reference, i will rechecked on it, but , heres a english subbed vid on beast saying that their fanclub will be b2uty [COPYRIGHT] (credits to b2utysubs)

re-edit , okay i found the source, but its in korean http://www.heraldbiz.com/SITE/data/html_dir/2009/11/02/200911020633.asp

Because Beast is already so popular they have a name for their fan club. "Our fan club's name is Beauty like Beauty and the Beast, haha."

irreverent news omitted, with credits to -xmyheart@b2strising(trans)

at least if you want to remove something, can you please check? cause afterall its a fan`s hardwork... please... tell me a reason? Nicky456 (talk) 03:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

The name of their fan club is trivial and does not need to be in the page. It is not up to me to check. You added it so you need to prove it. And for the love of God, read the edit summary. MS (Talk|Contributions) 04:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

okay, if you said its poorly sourced

there isnt a need to delete everything off,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBLAQ fan name, memebers name, all these are added, i see no reason, why aint you editing to that?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2PM members name are there too, doesnt it means poorly sources? dance style is there too, but doesnt it mean poorly sourced? its not in any big article, and its considered trival too, isnt it? and when you revert the, spelling name is wrong too, do note that yoseop is spelt as yoseob, and du jun is spell as doojoon , get the members name right when you want to edit, many thanks Nicky456 (talk) 04:36, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Again, the OFFICIAL SITE romanizes the names as Yo Seop and Du Jun. And just because other stuff exist does not make it acceptable for another article to have the same content. MS (Talk|Contributions) 04:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Your section was not actually sourced very well (their own website does not count as a reliable, third-party source). The other article are, with multiple citations. MS, I understand your reasoning, but you might want to try being little more clear how this works... Thanks,  fetchcomms☛ 04:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I believe when it comes to translating names, the ones on the official site are correct as there are many variations of how the artist(s) might want their name romanized. MS (Talk|Contributions) 05:25, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

I did check how I typed in the information for the second time , starting from scratch, against tvxq and shinee`s wiki, well for the members part, I more or less followed Shinee`s style of writing, but why is it that you said the source does NOT support the information provided ? I mean aint those birthdate profiles given in the official website >_>? sorry if I offended you, im still rather new in wiki, its only the 1st week since im here. From judging that you didnt remove other information I put on it, it seems that I improved already, so do guide me... and why it seems that you kept patrolling only on b2st`s wiki ><? Nicky456 (talk) 07:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

It's not the birthdays. The sources support that. It is the text that the source does not support. There is no point of have a member section when all that is there is their birth place and day. You have not offended me in anyway. The information you added is good. It needs to be copy edited but there is no problem with it. Also, I patrol my pages. Beast just happens to be the most active at the moment. MS (Talk|Contributions) 07:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

okays, i guess i got the rough idea to it but shinee`s sources seems to be lacking too... i check their source , its this link right http://shinee.iple.com/ ? but the link is broken , as such its lacking of information or to say its no longer considered a source right no? I would ask my friends to give me information as reguards to members information if there is else, i will neglect it, like what you said (: Nicky456 (talk) 07:26, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

The links need to be updated. They changed their web page from iple.com to smtown.com. MS (Talk|Contributions) 07:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Okay so what should i do to add in those member birthdays or so? okay im slightly getting you. as for the other members, just leave it? or? and the korean names , its given in the official website right? why cant I add it in into the wiki for beast? Nicky456 (talk) 07:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

erm sorry again, i dont really know how to use the talk function that well yet, but you said put under the same topic, okays so now I got a reference to hyun seung used to be in big bang and doo joon used to be hot blood , http://newsen.com/news_view.php?news_uid=384857 , let me know if it can considered as a ref? so I can edit accordingly, without you undo-ing to everything, it will be a waste of times for both of us (: if Im able to get more sources, i will put it here for members section. Sorry to disturb you so much, I just wanna do it right this time round. and sorry again, this website http://10.asiae.co.kr/Articles/new_view.htm?tsc=002005000&a_id=2009111711340972987 , the interview with 10 ASIA , can it be considered a reference? There is individual one too , and the group one mentioned about Doo Joon and Hyun Seung being eliminated , kikwang going to a group and yoseob being a long year trainee and such, look into it, and tell me if its considered as a reference, many thanks (:Nicky456 (talk) 10:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Some guideline

I'm trying to find the Wikipedia guideline that says that if something isn't broken, it shouldn't be fixed, but I can't find it for some stupid reason, and I remember you mentioning it in an edit you made a while back. Could you please point it out for me? Eugeniu B +1 06:32, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

You must be referring to redirects as that's the only thing that comes to mind when dealing with anything that is broken. The guideline can be found here. MS (Talk|Contributions) 14:30, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

List of Hot 100 number-one singles of xxxx (U.S.)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to these pages. Just thought I'd give a heads-up: Jaylon305 may be Billhits, an editor I've blocked a bunch of times for making those same types of edits to the Hot 100 lists and socking. He was (is?) hellbent on changing them all back and removing the images. I'll keep an eye on it; you may want to, also. Later! - eo (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

BoA Image

I will let an Admin determine if it does not meet Wikipedia's Fair Use Guideline. Thanks. Xbxg32000 (talk) 22:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Xbxg32000

File:Becky - Kokoro Komete.jpg

There is nothing that prevents this image from being used on more than one page, especially because until I just added it, it only had a fair use rationale to be used on Becky (talento) and not Kokoro Komete/Hapi Hapi.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

WP:NFC#UUI. See point one since the image is being used in a discography section. MS (Talk|Contributions) 23:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

There is a rationale being used in each case, and there is plenty of text in the caption and the accompanying discography section that makes it use much more in compliance with non-free content policies.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Also, there is nothing in MOS:TM that says the eighth note and the sharp cannot be used in a piped link to the article. It is also important because prior to this month, she was releasing songs under just "Becky".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:41, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Piped or not MOS:TM states that we are not to use characters that are not pronounced. MS (Talk|Contributions) 23:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Dealt with.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Also, it's not "Happy Happy". "Hapi Hapi" is Japanese onomatopoeia or something. Not the English words "Happy Happy".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)