User talk:WayKurat/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, WayKurat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  You may also want to visit The Filipino Wikipedians notice board. --Howard the Duck 05:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Infobox on GMA Network

I think the anons edits were legit. After all, several companies add those fields even if they exist on another template. --Howard the Duck 05:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I see... but I think the Infobox Network template is more appropriate for GMA Network... after all, it is a television network. i'ved also checked out the articles about NBC, CBS and ABC and they all use the said template. WayKurat

But unlike ABC, CBS, NBC, etc., they're subsidiaries of a company, while GMA is a company in itself. --Howard the Duck 05:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Ah, ok... now I understand... I'll just revert my last edits and replace the Infobox Network template with Infobox Company... thanks for the explanation! WayKurat

Image tagging for Image:24logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:24logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Speedy-deletion tags

When placing a speedy-deletion tag on an article ({{db-whatever}}), please don't blank the article at the same time; administrators can figure out what to do with the article faster if they can see the content. --ais523 12:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyvios

Hi, thanks for all the work you've been doing on new page patrol! I would like to point out to you that {{db-copyvio}} should be used for pages created within the last 48 hours only. As any older than, they are likely to be linked to from other articles and/or contain non-violating material in older revisions and require admins to do more investigation and sometimes to only delete some edits, not all. For the older cases of copyright violations you should use {{Copyvio}}. Cheers!--Konst.able^Talk 11:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

TV show hoaxes

I added

Central GMA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

List of programs broadcast by CGMA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Jeopardy! (Philippine Gameshow) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

to the Afd for Kahit Wala Ka Na, yet another TV hoax. Thought you might want to know. I don't know anything about Filipino TV (but I hate hoaxes), hopefully you can offer some input on the discussion. Tubezone 00:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

GMA Network

is being vandalized by a Kapamilya (lol). Need help, I might ran out of 3RR. Thanks. --Howard the Duck 08:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

This is 202.84.20.21, no offense, but I did not edit or vandalize those GMA News articles, actually, I do not even vandalize articles at all, so don't start acusing me of vandalism! You know what, this is where you take ****ing offense! You stupid *** **** *****! You know what a ****ing IP address is! a ****ing *** example of a IP address is "202.84.20.21!", ****ing IP addresses are used by ****ing internet cards! because I'm using a ****ing *** internet card! You ****ing *****! it could have been ****ing anyone who have ****ing vandalize those articles! anyone using the same ****ing internet card is your ****ing stupid *** vandalator! dump *** *****! Don't even ****ing reply to this ****ing message! because I'm not going to ****ing reply if you ****ing do!

Princess Charming

I wrote a new article for Princess Charming. It's in the Princess Charming discussion page. Maybe you can present it to Deletion Review when you request for undeletion. Thanks Doberdog 03:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:GMA logo 1980.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:GMA logo 1980.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kapuso.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kapuso.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jackie rice.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jackie rice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned images

Does this rule apply to free images as well? I uploaded an image of Iwa Moto...a photo I took of her during her FHM autograph session last year. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Iwa_Moto.jpg). The thing is, I forgot that there was another free image of Iwa Moto. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Iwa2.jpg) Feel free to remove "Image:Iwa_Moto.jpg" if you like. Doberdog 07:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I think it's a free image since you took the picture (See Wikipedia:Image use policy for details). You can request an administrator if you want the picture to be deleted... BTW, try to check out the Princess Charming article... I've posted your article there after it was unlocked. -WayKurat 17:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. BTW, I think we may have a problem with User:Planetary Chaos. He keeps placing "unsourced" and "wikify" tags on the Princess Charming page when clearly the page doesn't warrant it. He even considered putting the malaya.com link "vandalism". What should I do? Thanks in advance. Doberdog 00:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I've addressed the issue to the talk page of Tambayan Philippines... Maybe they can help us find more relevant sources... -WayKurat 05:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:995rt.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:995rt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Bitag logo changes

I was perusing through the history page of Bitag and I noticed that someone added a logo timeline of sorts. Just curious what was in there? - Marikina 15:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

An anon user just added removed the "List of Episodes" section and added the "Logos and Title Cards" section... the pictures he inserted are just blank boxes... I've reverted his edits because when he removed the logos section, he forgotten to add the episodes section back... -WayKurat 04:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

GMA Network articles

Seeing you're also concerned with the sudden mass deletions of the articles, I suggest recreating them even with the barest of sentences then ask User:Zscout370 for assistance on restoring the article history. Thanks. --Howard the Duck 06:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:H30 QTV.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:H30 QTV.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tags

You've recently added a truckload of {{db-bio}} tags to anime voice actor articles. These articles assert notability, so the vast majority have not been deleted. Any reason for the en masse addition of tags? --Wafulz 04:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

When I read these articles, most of it were written as if they were a Friendster account. (favorite anime series, etc.) Also, maybe the creator of these articles know these people personally which violates WP:COI. If they were notable enough, maybe they should be rewritten for Wikipedia standards. -WayKurat 13:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Bituin

I noticed that you mentioned two new articles (Grace Cornel and Ryan Ang) near the end of this AFD. Since they weren't mentioned until late, I left them alone. You'll need to nominate a separate AFD for them if you think they should be deleted. --Coredesat 05:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

On Dream FM

Hey. Isn't 106.7 Dream FM the proper name of that station, like how their on-air personalities would introduce it? I never heard any of them or their recordings/spiels call it Dream 106 FM. Reyrefran 10:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

I really don't know what is the proper name of that station since I never tried to listen to them. I've renamed it as such because that's the way they announce their name on ABC-5 and that's what written on their logo. -WayKurat 16:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Well what was written on their logo is different from what their personalities say on radio. Since I get a chance to listen to them more, isn't it appropriate that the article SHOULD be renames "106.7 Dream FM" since it's what they call it on-air? IMHO the name should be based on how they call it on-air instead of how the logo goes. Thanks! Reyrefran 23:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Alexx Agcaoili, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Oo7565 19:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Nice Entries

Hi WayKurat! I'm Arthur a.k.a. Nurikane, Reyrefran's buddy and ex-colleague. I'd like to commend you for doing a lot of effort in creating topics about radio stations here in Metro Manila. I'm very glad to help by expanding it and creating a specific articles on DZUP, et al). Hope you can help me how to create a topic and upload images though.

Read this...

hey dangarcia bakit naman naging advertising ung articles ko about my school Lord's Shepherds Academy? hindi parang ganito lang ang ginawa ko?>> Centro Escolar University saka sabihin mo ung specific na nandoon ung advertisement??? Hindi bat ikaw ang nag-aadvertise diyan sa GMA 7??? Filipino rin ako kaya gusto kong makilala yung school sa Guiguinto, Bulacan as if naman na ang mga taga-Mindanao o taga Visayas maging sa Metro manila ay ma-encourage ko para mag-aral sa school na ito...??? mag-isip nga muna please...

--Shepherds 03:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

unang-una, di ko inaadvertise ang GMA, bago ako naglalagay ng laman sa mga articles, sinisigurado ko na mayroon akong references. Tsaka kaya ko nilagyan ng {{ad}} tsaka {{unreferenced}} yung article na ginawa mo kasi yung mga dapat hindi ilagay sa Wikipedia, pati mapa ng school nyo nilagay mo, na parang advertisment lalong lalo na yung "Commitment" and "Goals and Objectives" part. Tsaka tignan mo yung articles ng ibang schools or universities, wala naman silang nilagay na mga ganun. Kung gusto mong ilagay yung mapa ng school nyo, lagyan mo na lang ng link from Wikimapia or Google Maps. Tapos wala ka pang references.

Please don't be offended with my edits, I am just following Wikipedia's policies regarding this matter. If you want to know more please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thanks for understanding... -WayKurat 09:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

At ngayon pinapalabas mo na inaatake kita dahil sa pagaadvertise mo sa GMA7. natural na may references yung GMA 7... as if naman na hindi kilala ang GMA sa buong mundo kahit nga hindi mo na isulat pa dito weh. Natural na walang references na makikita sa dahilan na ako na isang estudyante ang nagsimula nito. Kasisimula ko lang magsulat dito at magsulat ng tungkol sa eskwelahan ko tapos tinitira mo pa. so ano na gagawin mo ? buburahin ang articles ko? sige gawin mo. mas mabuti na yun kesa gaguhin mo yung mga ginawa ko. --Shepherds 10:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

ANO PA BANG REFERENCES ANG KAILANGAN MO?

saka bakit ba kailangang kong mag-prove sayo ha? kung ayaw mong maniwala wag mo, sino ka ba dito sa wikipedia... Ayan ha baka sabihin mo tinitira kita wag ka matakot sinasabi ko lang ang dapat kong sabihin at ipaglaban, ikaw ang nauna. --Shepherds 10:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Kailangan ko ng sagot ^... tapos ka na ba? mind your own business WayKurat,.. maraming mas magandang gawin dito sa pinas kesa manira ng article ng iba. Manood ka nalang ng no.1 kapuso station upang malibang ka. ^_^. peace na tau ha, hindi ka naman sumasagot weh, wag ka mag-alala hindi ako isang kapamilya na gusto ka ring atakihin like the previous ones... Saka isa pa ang hirap palang magpaliwanag noh --Shepherds 10:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Hindi kita pinepersonal o ginagago, sinasabi ko lang na wala sa format yung article na ginawa mo. Ang Wikipedia kasi, encyclopedia, hindi sya blog o personal website. Kung nabasa mo yung Guidelines and Policies, may mga format na dapat sundin at may mga bagay na pwedeng ilagay sa article sa Wikipedia at meron naman na hindi pwede. May mga nilagay ka kasi sa article mo na hindi pwede dito sa Wikipedia, tulad ng mapa ng school nyo o yung motto at "goals and objectives". Kung administrator ang unang pumuna sa article mo, malamang ganun din ang gagawin, pagsasabihan ka rin na dapat i-wikify ang article na ginawa mo.

Hindi ko rin sinasabi na wala kayong karapatang gumawa ng article tungkol sa school mo, ang sinasabi ko lang, ilagay nyo sa ayos at sumunod ka sa guidelines ng Wikipedia.

Tandaan mo, hindi mo pag-aari ang mga articles na ginawa mo. Kahit yung mga ginawa kong articles dito, hindi ko pwedeng sabihing sa akin yun dahil lahat ng contributions na ginagawa mo dito under siya ng GFDL. Para kasing pinapalabas mo na ikaw lang ang may karapatang mag-edit ng article na ginawa mo.

Mabuti pa, basahin mo 'to: Wikipedia:Ownership of articles, tsaka basahin mong mabuti yung policies and guidelines dito para maliwanagan ka kung ano ang pwede at hindi pwedeng gawin dito.

Paalala ko lang sa'yo, wag kang mang-atake ng ibang editors, pwede kang ma-block dito. Marami na ang nabablock sa ganyang pakikitungo sa ibang editors. -WayKurat 12:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

At konting paalala lang...konting lamig lang po ng ulo. :) --- Tito Pao 15:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

HELP: PREPARE FOR SPEEDY DELETION

I am the author of this page as you can see on the history... i am SHEPHERDS and i want this page to be deleted immediately. There is no such thing as Lord's Shepherds Academy. As you can see it has no reference or even a source. It is also an advertisement even so it is not true. I the creator of this page has just invented such thing like the hot fm and Lord's Shepherds Academy. Please prepare this page and also the one 91.1 Hot FM for speedy deletion. Thanks. Again I say I am the author of this page as I started it and edit all of its content and this page is just an imagination. thanks

--Shepherds 05:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)--Shepherds 05:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Shepherds Academy

Just a friendly reminder to use an edit summary when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! Oo7565 19:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ABSCBN.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:ABSCBN.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

DM 95.5

I am going to put History on DM 95.5 because Pinoy Radio 95.5 existed 6 years ago.Dm955 03:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dwnu 1075fm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dwnu 1075fm.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Dwnu 1075fm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dwnu 1075fm.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Tagging of Tok! Tok! Tok! 1 Million Pasok!

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Tok! Tok! Tok! 1 Million Pasok!. I do not think that Tok! Tok! Tok! 1 Million Pasok! fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because the names of the network, host, an country provide pleanty of context, although there is little content. See WT:CSD#The meaning of no context for more info. I request that you consider not re-tagging Tok! Tok! Tok! 1 Million Pasok! for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk) 17:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Apclogo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Apclogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Balitanghali.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Balitanghali.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Blazin1059.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blazin1059.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dzrh philippines.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dzrh philippines.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dzfe 987 ph.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dzfe 987 ph.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dream fm.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dream fm.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tv_patrol_1980s.jpg

I have tagged Image:Tv_patrol_1980s.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. BigrTex 05:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey WayKurat

I never edited the pages again after you undid it. Nor any other Filipino actor/movie/etc. Sorry about that. Its just sad that Filipinos don't have their photos on Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kit the Kat (talk • contribs) 12:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes, you have stopped, but you continued to upload copyrighted material on other pages in Wikipedia. If you want to add images to Wikipedia, make sure that it is clear of copyright claims. Please read WP:COPYRIGHT for more details. -WayKurat (talk) 12:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

quick question

Can I add pics of screenshots that I took by myself from films? I want my favorite shows/characters to have their own photos. Please advise. Thanks. --Kit the Kat (talk) 08:28, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Screenshots can fall under fair use category per Wikipedia:NFCI#Images. Please note that there ARE limitations in using these images. Please read Unacceptable use section of the Non-free content policy for more details. -WayKurat (talk) 09:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I am not fully understanding it. Is it ok for me to submit promotional posters of movies/characters even if they are copyrighted? It says so in the Wikipedia:NFCI#Images section. Unless I misunderstood? Please let me know. I am not going to replace pages with photos, just those that don't have one yet. I'm kind of new to this editing thing and I need your help if that's ok. i don't want to break copyright rules and so on. --Kit the Kat (talk) 01:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Copyrighted images such as screenshots, posters, etc. can be used but it has limitations such as, it should be uploaded in lower resolution to prevent it to be reproduced, it should be only used in one article, it cannot be used for templates and infoboxes, and it can only be used for a specific subject. An example of this is you can upload a screenshot or a poster of the movie "'Till I Met You" and use it in the movie's article but you cannot use it as a profile picture of Regine Velasquez or Robin Padilla. Free images such as a photo of an artist you took yourself are being encouraged more than uploading copyrighted images to depict the artist (see the uploaded image in the Juris Fernandez article for the example).

Also, as I as a reminder, you cannot just grab images from the internet and upload it here. The proper procedure for that is you have to get permission from the owner of that image (an e-mail or any confirmation from the owner) and agreed that his image can be used in Wikipedia via CC-BY-SA 3.0 License. -WayKurat (talk) 02:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I think I get it now. I will upload an image to a page when I have time and see if it is accepted. Thanks for your time! --Kit the Kat (talk) 03:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello again, WayKurat! I have uploaded a few promo pics to an article. Please check if they are ok and can be accepted. As I have said, I am just a beginner at this and do not fully understand the policies. If they are wrong, then please feel free to remove them and let me know. I followed other articles that has promo pics for their characters. Some took them from the show's official websites, so I did that as well. I completed the descriptions and received no complaints from the admin like what happened last time, so I guess they are fine. But just to be sure, please let me know if they are ok. I'd rather hear it from you first rather than from an obsessed fan of the show who just doesn't want their edits to be changed (you know there are some of those around here lol). Its on the List of The Sword of Truth characters. Thanks! --Kit the Kat (talk) 07:14, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

The pictures that you have added can cause problems since you have added them in a "List of..." characters. As per WP:OVERUSE, As little non-free content as possible is used in an article. Short rather than long video and audio excerpts are used. Multiple items are not used if one will suffice; one is used only if necessary.. Adding the images on the character's article (if it exists) can be acceptable for time to time. An example is the List of characters in The Simpsons article, you can see there that it only included one non-free image and not individual images of every character. But there is an existing image of Homer Simpson and Bart Simpson on their individual articles.

Based on my experience, I have done the same thing (adding non-free images) previously on the Banknotes of the Philippine peso article, adding a set of images of the New Generation series. It was removed immediately by one of the admins citing WP:OVERUSE. -WayKurat (talk) 11:34, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Again, thanks for the advice. I tried to place the pics on their respective individual articles, but they don't have any. Everytime I click their names, it appears on that page. I placed those photos a few days ago, and they have not yet been removed by an admin. Maybe its because, thay don't have individual pages. I'll just keep it there until they do get removed. Thanks again. --Kit the Kat (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

About DWET-FM page

Hi WayKurat (Danngarcia), according to the Energy FM Manila (Official) Facebook fanpage, Energy FM will be on 106.7 FM starting July 1, but, the name Dream 106.7 (or 106.7 Dream FM) will be retain (it is said Energy FM on Dream 106.7, according to the Energy FM Manila (Official) Facebook fanpage). What can you say about that?. --Badofilada (talk) 06:56, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

My special message for you

BTW Mr. WayKurat, please join us at The World Exclusives and Itanong Mo Kay Admin, Internet ang Sasagot, Pinoy Showbiz Eklavu and New Request and Suggest Page, Alternative TV History Page and Citizen Journalists' ReACTION, search it on Facebook, ok, and also, please invite your Facebook friends there, ok. --Badofilada (talk) 07:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Your Idiot

By MuZemike — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louieblac k (talk • contribs) 03:24, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Reporter's notebook gma.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Reporter's notebook gma.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Lagotka gma.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lagotka gma.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

All Filipino Cup

Ser,

During the 1970s/1980s, for the record, the PBA dont used the Word "Cup", commentators nor sportswriters never called it All-Filipino Cup, its "Conference", try to be realistic and sensitive in giving infos, like it is during those days, Crispa and Toyota fans are reading this and they deserve a reliable source in PBA history, in the 1990s, particularly 1993-onwards, it's understandable the word "Cup" can be used now in the All-Filipino because of the change of tournament name.Edmon74 02:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I awarded you for reverting vandalism neatly. Keep up your unstoppable reverting against vandalism from the Philippine TV Vandal. Thank you. Kungfu2187 (talk) 11:21, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Phil TV Vandal Retaliation Impossible

It is really impossible for him to retaliate. BTW, he has a case of autism. Vgyu 02:28, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

He has no Asperger syndrome or autism. Stop mentioning his real life and behavior. It is a violation of Wikipedia's harassment policy.

And possibly a hacker. He is violating Facebook's Terms of Use. Kungfu2187 (talk) 03:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

I apologize. But his brother talked to us and told that he really have autism. Vgyu 11:18, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

This person is unstoppable. I created Wikipedia:Abuse response/110.55.4.41 for consensus against use of multiple IPs. --Kungfu2187 (talk) 07:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

deletion

I've searched the sources of Salt&Light Radio in http://www.pinoyexchange.com/forums/showthread.php?p=56904923

They're considered one of the major stations in the Philippines, together with Radio Pilipinas, what's the matter of this station? Why the wikipedia need to delete the article but I provided the sources so anything wrong with that, please reply immediately, Thank you --Automatedmusic (talk) 01:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Per WP:Reliable sources, a forum discussion thread is NOT a valid source since it can be created by yourselves to prove notability of your created article. -WayKurat (talk) 01:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay thank you WayKurat, I've got mistake, Salt&Light Radio is one of my favorite Filipino station, but please do not delete Radio Pilipinas, Xtreme-Radio and Zone105. Thank you for the time dude! --Automatedmusic (talk) 01:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Automatedmusic here

WayKurat, in good faith, I will delete Salt&Light Radio, but can I make other Filipino internet radio stations similarly to Salt&Light, Zone105, Radio Pilipinas, and etc.? Thank you --Automatedmusic (talk) 01:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Just make sure that those stations have proper notability. Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources for more details. -WayKurat (talk) 01:49, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

I'll remember it! WayKurat, but please remove me as a sockpuppet of DjJosh, I;m just a new here in Wikipedia, Thank you WayKurat --Automatedmusic (talk) 01:56, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Sticker Happy, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. roh. (talk) 11:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Pinoy Nostalgia's Fight vs. Hoaxers, Deleters, Posers and Hackers Page

Recently, you are now removed from the hoaxers and former hoaxers page. Thank you.

-jason24589 (Admin Caloocan of Pinoy Nostalgia's Fight vs. Hoaxers, Deleters, Posers and Hackers Page) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jason24589 (talk • contribs) 11:30, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

QUESTION

Will you forgive admin Bulacan or not? Vgyu 02:10, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Moments of love ost.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moments of love ost.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lovestruck.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lovestruck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello WayKurat, can you be my friend and also a partner on this site? Please reply and thanks for re-editing channel 31.

Shanayujilover (talk) 01:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

No, It Is Not

No, GMA News TV International, that page is not the same as GMA News TV as it will have featured the carriers, the programs (some of which are not of GMA News TV in the Philippines and vice versa) and will feature events associated with GMA News TV but I guess that won't happen now that you keep on PREVENTING it... So hoping for your consideration....--NewKidzsterFun2011 (talk) 18:08, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thanks for your edits. Dougweller (talk) 10:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

You don't know MUST

Did you know that the MUST page was created by some MUSTeans and what I did was just to make it look good, improving it, so you do not have the right to change it since you do not know my school! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rigorimpossible (talk • contribs) 01:31, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

MUST "Cleansed"

I have edited MUST's page and you should see it for yourself. If you have some corrections and recommendations please let us know before you take actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rigorimpossible (talk • contribs) 02:57, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Blaming me as sockpuppet?

Hello waykurat, please remove your tag on me about the sockpuppet? I'm contributing Christianity or Protestant-related articles, swear on God, not to vandalize of those.. thank you --ElmersGlue2011 (talk) 23:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

I know that you've tried to make a contribution about those things, but please don't blame to WayKurat, he was only doing the right thing, and maybe, he didn't know about it. So please leave WayKurat alone? Hamham31 (talk) 03:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

It's not just "blame", all I need is to remove WayKurat's tag on me of being suckpuppet of a very strange user. If he wants some evidence, he may look ony my contributions so what's the matter with that? of being having multiple account to edit Christ's Commission Fellowship, Jesus Is Lord Church, Bread of Life Ministries International, Victory Christian Fellowship, and other Filipino protestant churches and Christian articles? All of my contribution is not to promote any of those especially CCF (I'm a member of that) and Bread of Life (by the way my sister's church), I just want to fix some article into a good tone of sentence and explained briefly. SO sorry to say Hamham, but I sholud have an online talk with Waykurat for "sockpuppet" matter and to fix it as soon as he could, and I can prove the truth. Have a blessed day! thank you --ElmersGlue2011 (talk) 06:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Well if that is your point, then good luck.Hamham31 (talk) 08:18, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikiproject Homeschooling

Hello WayKurat, please join this Special Wikiproject if you are interested:

Please accept this invite to join the Homeschooling WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with Homeschooling.
Simply click here to accept! Hamham31 (talk) 03:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Sheer curiosity

Why did you revert edits of 180.194.29.172 (talk · contribs) on sea articles? Materialscientist (talk) 03:39, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

The anon added this paragraph on the DZBB-TV article. I incidentally reverted all of the edits from that IP address. I already reverted my edits. Apologies for that mishap. -WayKurat (talk) 04:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Philippines TV

I responded to your concern at AVI. I've noticed concerns being raised about these kinds of edits recently but unfortunately am not in a position to act unilaterally on the specific example you gave. I do however suggest you do pursue your concerns in another venue if you are worried about these edits.

Regards, --RA (talk) 13:19, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

The evidence I have provided is very clear, and I have reported this to AIV, since this is very obvious. The name of the previous sockpuppet (User:Ruseel.Liwag) is very similar to the one that I am reporting (User:Russel.Liwag). The only difference is the spelling. -WayKurat (talk) 13:22, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Dawn Zulueta

Hello WayKurat. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dawn Zulueta, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Patricia Mae Santos: Thanks for the revert

I was about to undo my edits on the page, as I was reading the rules on BLP, and found that notability has not been established. Thanks for correcting the edits! LordBelly06 (talk) 09:21, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Vice-Presidential Flag.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vice-Presidential Flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 03:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Long term vandal

Howdy! I saw your note at User talk:180.194.29.51 regarding long-term slow-scale vandalism. It's happened again at Music of Bhutan. Perhaps the IP desires a block? JFHJr (㊟) 15:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

ABS-CBN one year Tag

Hello! I just observed why abs-cbn is the only tag message in the Philippines. Why the other Philippine network like GMA Network and TV5 is also no tag, as well as no program reference of the said networks but why ABS-CBN. And other thing is not a blog site reference but came from the program TV show from the ABS-CBN website itself. So I just moved to current reference of present ABS-CBN show to know it. End of quote And one more thing, No official announcement for franchised of The Voice (Philippines) (A reality signing search of Endemol) for both ABS-CBN and Endemol. But X-Factor Philippines from FremantelMedia will air first next year. Only Pinoy Big Brother will air first which also from Endemol. Puppyph (Puppyph) 14:50, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

hoax CSDs

Hey, I notice you are CSDing some articles as hoax. How do you know they are hoaxes? As an american, it is not blatant to me that they are hoax. Is there some clue that is culturally specific there? Perhaps the article should still be deleted, but for a different reason? Or via PROD/AFD? Gaijin42 (talk) 05:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

The articles that I have nominated were created by a longtime Philippine TV vandal sockpuppet. I have already created an SPI for the said user (John Abento). Most of the created articles by this user are blatant hoaxes and I have mentioned them on the SPI report. -WayKurat (talk) 05:53, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New PHP100 Banknote (Reverse).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New PHP100 Banknote (Reverse).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry accusation

You posted a banner at User talk:Ilokanongbriton indicating suspicion that this user might be a sock of Hidiplongi (talk · contribs), but you never acted on that suspicion by adding anything to the relevant SPI. Can I ask why not? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I just created an SPI for this user. Please check Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hidiplongi. -WayKurat (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User talk:Revinchristian

User talk:Revinchristian, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Revinchristian and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Revinchristian during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hamham31Heke! 08:16, 15 November 2011 (UTC)