User talk:Visioncurve/Archive 4

Latest comment: 1 year ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 1 January 2023

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

edit

Mongol conquest of the Khwarazmian Empire

edit

The correct date in Mongol conquest of the Khwarazmian Empire is 1256 don't learn me my country's history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirfataei (talkcontribs) 14:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Amirfataei, I am not quite sure what you possibly mean by saying "don't learn me...", but I'd simply go on and make my humble comment on the reason why I reverted your contribution. As HistoryofIran rightly noted in his edit summary after what he had reverted your contribution (again), the above-mentioned article is not as straightforward as it may seem regarding what part of history it tries to portray. To clear the air, the best of both worlds would probably be taking the issue to the article's talk page. --VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 06:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
PS: By the way, I see you have followed our suggestion and left a message in the talk page trying to explain your insistence on that particular change you wished to implement in the article. Now, please wait for other interested editors to respond to your message (remember, it may take some time, be patient!) and later establish consensus on this issue. --VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 10:46, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

edit

Ali-Shir Nava'i

edit

Thank you. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

You are always welcome, mate! I'm glad to know that my edit was helpful. Movaffaq baashi :-) --VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 09:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – July 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

  Technical news

  • user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.

Tech News: 2022-28

edit

19:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-29

edit

22:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-30

edit

19:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

edit

Tech News: 2022-31

edit

21:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Turkoman (ethnonym)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Turkoman (ethnonym) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TrangaBellam -- TrangaBellam (talk) 15:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

My latest contribution

edit

Poetry of Babur

edit
 
Illustrations in the Baburnama regarding the fauna of India.

Babur was an acclaimed writer, who had a profound love for literature. His library was one of his most beloved possessions that he always carried around with him, and books were one of the treasures he searched for in new conquered lands. In his memoirs, when he listed sovereigns and nobles of a conquered land, he also mentioned poets, musicians and other educated people.[1]

During his 47-year life, Babur left a rich literary and scientific heritage. He is the author of the world-famous Bāburnāma, as well as beautiful lyrical works or ghazals, treatises on Muslim jurisprudence (Mubayyin), poetics (Aruz risolasi), music, and a special calligraphy, known as khatt-i Baburi.[2][3][4][5] Continue reading it here.

  1. ^ Eraly, Abraham (1997). Emperors of the Peacock Throne: The Saga of the Great Moghuls. Penguin Books Limited. p. 29.
  2. ^ Eraly, Abraham (1997). Emperors of the Peacock Throne: The Saga of the Great Moghuls. Penguin Books Limited. p. 30.
  3. ^ Hasanov, S. (1981). Bobirning "Aruz risolasi" asari (in Uzbek). pp. 1-4. Uzbekistan: Fan.
  4. ^ Schimmel, A. (2004). The Empire of the Great Mughals: History, Art and Culture. p. 26. India: Reaktion Books.
  5. ^ Eraly, A. (2000). Last Spring: The Lives and Times of Great Mughals. pp. 30-41. India: Penguin Books Limited.

Administrators' newsletter – August 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

 

  Administrator changes

  Valereee
  Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • CapitalistroadsterSamsara

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
  • An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

  Technical news

  • The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
  • Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

  Arbitration

  • The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

  Miscellaneous

  • You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
  • Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
  • Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.

Tech News: 2022-32

edit

19:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Beverly Hills Cop

edit

Hello, appreciate your rescission of my edit if the format was not correct.

The story I posted is a true story that I think adds something to the page. However would be difficult to substantiate.

Any tips on how it should be posted here? My father was an actual Detroit cop when the film was being made, and that is the actual origin story for the character's name. In the real example, Zig did not grant them usage of his name, hence the different spelling of Bogumil VS Bogomil Dpolancih (talk) 15:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dpolancih, hi. Your addition to the Beverly Hills Cop article actually had three problems, one of which begged for immediate attention. While it was surely a good faith edit, the first and foremost problem was that you added your paragraph to the wrong part of the page, after the reference list, which is not appropriate. There are a couple of useful suggestions in WP:MOS that you may want to familiarize yourself with before you proceed editing Wikipedia. Also, your addition was not backed by reliable sources. According to WP:VER, all material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. Lastly, and unfortunately, your paragraph was written poorly with several grammatical errors, and therefore it was, coupled with reasons mentioned above, deemed as unconstructive. Take care! VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 05:37, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2022-33

edit

21:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Animal Kingdom

edit

Lucien Savron wrote the original screenplay for this movie and TV series. David has taken all the credit because no-one will speak for Lucien. His family should be credited for the genius which was his original screenplay and is still in written copy at their home. 124.168.200.13 (talk) 13:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please, provide a reliable source to back up your addition. According to WP:VER, all material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. Have a good day! VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 15:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello

edit

Hello @Visioncurve, I have noticed your edits on Babur's poetry (it's kinda late, yeah) and they are great! Section looks amazing in terms of both style and significance of information. Thank you for your contributions on developing the Wikipedia. BerkBerk68 02:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

BerkBerk68, many thanks for your comment and compliments. I appreciate that. Take care! VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 05:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Rich Eisen

edit

The source is his own acknowledgment, via the "Rich Eisen Show." I've no idea how you'd provide a reference for that. 99.37.53.180 (talk) 17:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't matter. According to WP:VER, all material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it.WP:RS also states that articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 04:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2022-34

edit

00:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-35

edit

23:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

edit

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – September 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  • A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
  • An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
  • The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

  Miscellaneous

  • The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
  • Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.

Tech News: 2022-36

edit

23:20, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-37

edit

01:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

edit

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Correction to previous election announcement

edit

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2022-38

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Turkoman

edit

Your GA nomination for Turkoman (ethnonym) has been re-reviewed .--Gazozlu (talk) 22:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

edit

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2022-39

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2022-40

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2022-41

edit

14:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter

edit
Guild of Copy Editors October 2022 Newsletter
 

 

Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up for our July Backlog Elimination Drive, 18 copy-edited, between them, 116 articles. Barnstars awarded are noted here.

Blitz: Participants in our August Copy Editing Blitz copy-edited 51,074 words in 17 articles. Of the 15 editors who signed up, 11 claimed at least one copy-edit. Barnstars awarded are noted here.

Drive: Forty-one editors took part in our September Backlog Elimination Drive; between them they copy-edited 199 articles. Barnstars awards are noted here.

Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz begins on 16 October at 00:01 (UTC) and will end on 22 October at 23:59 (UTC). Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 303 requests for copy edit – including withdrawn and declined ones – since 1 January. At the time of writing, there are 77 requests awaiting attention and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,759. We always need more active, skilled copyeditors – particularly for requests – so please get involved if you can.

Election news: In our mid-year election, serving coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tenryuu were returned for another term, and were joined by new coordinator Zippybonzo. No lead coordinator was elected for this half-year. Jonesey95, a long-serving coordinator and lead, was elected as coordinator emeritus; we thank them for their service. Thank you to everyone who took part. Our next election of coordinators takes place throughout December. If you'd like to help out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself or other suitable editors (with their permission, of course!). It's your Guild, after all!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tenryuu and Zippybonzo.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Baffle☿gab 03:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2022-42

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 21:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2022-43

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 21:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

edit

Tech News: 2022-44

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 21:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2022-45

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2022-46

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 21:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2022-47

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:20, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

edit

Tech News: 2022-48

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

 

  CheckUser changes

  TheresNoTime

  Oversight changes

  TheresNoTime

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2022-49

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter

edit
Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter
 

 

Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since October. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz focused on July and August 2022 request months; and articles tagged for c/e in December 2021 and January 2022. Seventeen of those who signed up claimed at least one copy-edit, and between them copy-edited forty-six articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: In the November Backlog Elimination Drive, thirty editors signed up, twenty-two of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Both target months—December 2021 and January 2022—were cleared, and February was added to the target months. Sixteen requests were copy-edited and 239 articles were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here.

Blitz: Our seven-day-long December 2022 Copy Editing Blitz begins on 17 December at 00:01 (UTC)*. It will focus on articles tagged for copy-edit in February 2022, and pending requests from September and October. Barnstars awarded will be available here.

Progress report: As of 22:40, 8 December 2022, GOCE copyeditors have processed 357 requests since 1 January, there were seventy-four requests outstanding and the backlog stands at 1,791 articles. We always need skilled copy-editors; please help out if you can.

Election news: Nomination of candidates for the GOCE's Election of Coordinators for the first half of 2023 is open and continues until 23:59 on 15 December. Voting begins at 00:01 on 16 December and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Coordinators serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on June 30. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, please nominate yourself or any editor you consider suitable—with their permission, of course!. It's your Guild and it doesn't coordinate itself.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers and best seasonal wishes from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu, and Zippybonzo.

*All times and dates on this newsletter are UTC.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter error

edit

The GOCE December 2022 newsletter, as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our December Blitz. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2022-50

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tuqaq - towards another GA

edit

I spotted your improvements to Tuqaq; will go through them, as time permits. I hope that you have rectified the particular errors, that I had raised in the delisting process. Regards, TrangaBellam (talk) 07:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

And, might I suggest that any improvements to Magtymguly Pyragy is an exercise in futility? Simply put, there does not exist enough reliable sources to write an encyclopedic biography of the subject. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please stop editing Tuqaq. Thanks, TrangaBellam (talk) 09:21, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
With regard to latest content added to improve the Magtymguly page, I believe, at the end of the day, there are set norms and standards at WP:RS to which we can refer and further be guided. I hope we will go through that together later, of course if your time permits. As for the article about Tuqaq, from where I'm standing it seems that your last statement comes close to being an expression of ownership behavior (I hope I'm wrong). Nonetheless, I'm open for cooperation and as we speak, I expect you to finish your GA re-assessment of the "Turkomans" page first, since by starting a review you have committed to complete it in a timely manner. Regards, VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 10:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
There is no deadline. Please address my queries at Talk:Tuqaq. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
And at Talk:Treaty of Akhal. You will keep writing nonsense, I will keep pointing the errors, you won't learn anything ... TrangaBellam (talk) 14:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
That was it, I'm having you reported for misconduct now. If you did your homework first, you would've found out that those "nonsense" sentences (you defined which at the article's talk page -

Iran was unable to mount much of a defense, and Geok Tepe fell shortly.

The immobilized Naser al-Din Shah Qajar was compelled to accept nominal defeat...

- were both actually added by you - 1. You added that baloney yourself many months ago to come later during the year and accuse me in order to discredit me? Your villainy doesn't know any boundaries.
I'm tired of your constant accusations, misbehavior and bias towards me which can be construed as a personal attack. I will also have to ask for another GA reviewer for Turkomans page, based on all this. I don't see a way how we two can work together from now on. VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 05:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Report me wherever you please. Shall we take a look at the article history?
Version 0 - ed. VisionCurve - 11 June 2021

Hence forces led by Generals Mikhail Skobelev, Ivan Lazarev, and Konstantin Kaufman spearheaded the campaign, with Iran unable to react. The immobilized Naser al-Din Shah Qajar sent foreign secretary Mirza Saeed Khan Ansari to meet Ivan Zinoviev and sign a treaty in Tehran. [Unsourced]

Version 1 - ed. TrangaBellam - 13 October 2021

Iran was unable to mount much of a defense, and Geok Tepe fell shortly. The immobilized Naser al-Din Shah Qajar was compelled to accept nominal defeat, and sent foreign secretary Mirza Saeed Khan Ansari to meet Ivan Zinoviev and sign a treaty in Tehran.[Unsourced]

Note carefully that I rewrote the unsourced content without changing its meaning and did not tamper with existing citations. I (and others) do often engage in copy-edits of unsourced content.
Version 2 - ed. VisionCurve - 19 December 2022

Iran was unable to mount much of a defense, and Geok Tepe fell shortly. The immobilized Naser al-Din Shah Qajar was compelled to accept nominal defeat, and sent foreign secretary Mirza Saeed Khan Ansari to meet Ivan Zinoviev and sign a treaty in Tehran.[Source]

It was your edit that gave the (demonstrably false) impression of the content being sourced. But I was mistaken in assuming that it was you who had incorporated it; it is in the article since creation:

Forces led by Generals Scoblev, Lazarov, and Kaufman spearheaded the campaign, with Persia unable to react. The immobilized Nasereddin Shah sent foreign secretary Mirza Sa'eed Khan Mo'tamen ol-Mulk to meet Ivan Zinoviev and sign a treaty in Tehran.

Your appending of a citation to obviously inaccurate content was shabby but you deserve an apology for my mistaken assumption. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:10, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am tired of your "assumptions" really; I am tired of blocks of messages about the content of certain articles where you simultaneously employ mocking statements (you keep writing nonsense.., you won't learn anything..,, The OP exhibits a IDHT attitude and is unaware of where his competencies lie , with a sole intent to confront or inhibit my work, your unacceptable "no-edit orders" and false accusations like the one above distantly resemble wikibullying and wikihounding (like following me from place-to-place on Wikipedia, and reviewing my user's contributions; I'm talking about the Akhal treaty where you placed as blame on me for inaccurate claims whereas these were your own contributions to the page).
I hope you recall my messages at your talk page where I apologized for my initial, frustrating response to your previous GA reassessment work and even praised your past remarks (1) as I tried to implement your and later Gazozlu's notes as I agreed with them. However, with regard to Turkomans page, you keep buying time and it's been already 5 month since you committed to conduct the GA reassessment of that page. I posted my request for your further notes three times (1, 2, 3), but you responded to them by your laconic "Noted" and that there was no deadline.
Moreover, I have not nominated my other two failed GAs (Magtymguly, Tuqaq) for GA reassessment, the page on Tuqaq is not a finished article yet. But you continue to exhibit the patterns of behavior with arrogance, ridicule and satire (1), which makes me believe you are singling me out to create irritation, annoyance, and distress. VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire
Given your history of misrepresenting sources and writing inaccurate content, I will keep a tab over your editorial activities and note misusage of sources etc. at the t/p. I do note that two experienced administrators (and others) disagreed with whatever you proposed at Talk:Babur#Verse from Babur's poetry. Both of them accused you of edit-warring, giving flippant replies, and engaging in OR but to you, the concerning part was mine discussing your antecedents with the administrator. I will let Yamla take a look. Btw, Talk:Mughal_Empire/Archive 4#Persian influence is interesting too! TrangaBellam (talk) 15:34, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Your last arguments are completely all over the map as it now seems that you're clinging on by your fingernails. With regard to the Babur page, there was no edit-warring at all, the history of the article's edits is for everyone to see (June 5th, 2022). In fact, it was another, experienced editor who undid the revert (dif 1, dif 2) and supported my addition. Why are you distorting facts? What are you trying to achieve? Do you want to embarrass yourself as much as when you accused me of adding "nonsense" (dif 3) to the Treaty of Akhal page (dif 4) when at the end it turned out to be actually your own contribution (dif 5)? Instead of your imaginary edit-warring, I decided to strike a happy medium and later created a whole new section on Babur's poetry, which definitely improved the page. In particular, this was my contribution to the page:

Babur was an acclaimed writer, who had a profound love for literature. His library was one of his most beloved possessions that he always carried around with him, and books were one of the treasures he searched for in new conquered lands. In his memoirs, when he listed sovereigns and nobles of a conquered land, he also mentioned poets, musicians and other educated people.[1] During his 47-year life, Babur left a rich literary and scientific heritage. He authored his famous memoir the Bāburnāma, as well as beautiful lyrical works or ghazals, treatises on Muslim jurisprudence (Mubayyin), poetics (Aruz risolasi), music, and a special calligraphy, known as khatt-i Baburi.[2][3][4][5] Babur's Bāburnāma is a collection of memoirs, written in the Chagatai language and later translated into Persian, the usual literary language of the Mughal court, during the rule of emperor Akbar.[6] However, Babur's Turkic prose in Bāburnāma is already highly Persianized in its sentence structure, vocabulary, and morphology,[7] and also consists of several phrases and minor poems in Persian. Babur wrote most of his poems in Chagatai Turkic, known to him as Türki, but he also composed in Persian. However, he was mostly praised for his literary works written in Turkic, which drew comparison with the poetry of Ali-Shir Nava'i.[1]

|}

But of course, you won't mention this and my other similar contributions on the ground that it contradicts your real intent regarding me.
Moreover, just as Talk:Mughal_Empire/Archive 4#Persian influence is interesting to you, it is interesting to me as well, because it presupposes your one particular action, which can be again, construed as WP:Wikihounding. What I mean is, just after I made my case known at that discussion (dif 6) you were first to respond and quickly sided with the user F&F against me without providing any argument for doing so:

[Detailed reply incoming]. Broadly, I am in agreement with F&F. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your detailed reply is still on its way, since 5th of July... This again brings us, right, to Wikihounding: "The offender usually singles out an editor by maliciously joining discussions on multiple pages or topics that editor may regularly contribute to and in order to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work". It continues with: "Wikihounding usually involves following the target from place-to-place on Wikipedia, and often can be identified by reviewing the offending user's contributions." For instance, I didn't even mention your username or pinged you when I looked for an administrator advice on our ongoing dispute and published my concern at admin Yamla's talkpage.
Also, last but not least, I was afraid to miss this gem - your "I will keep a tab over your editorial activities" is basically your confession in Wikihounding for me.VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 12:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am, perhaps, one of the most active editors in topics on S. Asian history. Nonetheless, you can try convincing someone that it was wikihounding on my part.
As to "edit-warring", I did not accuse you but noted that administrators had accused you of such charges. In the discussion that I had linked to, Abecedare wrote, I am disappointed that an experienced editor such as yourself [VisionCurve] is edit-warring in article-space instead of discussing the issue here to arrive at a consensus.. Obviously, it might be the case that their allegations were untrue. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:00, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ a b Eraly, Abraham (1997). Emperors of the Peacock Throne: The Saga of the Great Moghuls. Penguin Books Limited. p. 29.
  2. ^ Eraly, Abraham (1997). Emperors of the Peacock Throne: The Saga of the Great Moghuls. Penguin Books Limited. p. 30.
  3. ^ Hasanov, S. (1981). Bobirning "Aruz risolasi" asari (in Uzbek). pp. 1-4. Uzbekistan: Fan.
  4. ^ Schimmel, A. (2004). The Empire of the Great Mughals: History, Art and Culture. p. 26. India: Reaktion Books.
  5. ^ Eraly, A. (2000). Last Spring: The Lives and Times of Great Mughals. pp. 30-41. India: Penguin Books Limited.
  6. ^ "Biography of Abdur Rahim Khankhana". Archived from the original on 2006-01-17. Retrieved 2006-10-28.
  7. ^ Dale, Stephen Frederic (2004). The garden of the eight paradises: Bābur and the culture of Empire in Central Asia, Afghanistan and India (1483–1530). Brill. pp. 15, 150. ISBN 90-04-13707-6.

Tech News: 2022-51

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Turkoman (ethnonym)

edit

The article Turkoman (ethnonym) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Turkoman (ethnonym) and Talk:Turkoman (ethnonym)/GA5 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 01:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

I do believe that your edits are unquestionably plagiarism (check relevant policies of any reputed university) but concede that Wikipedia's policy (imo) has a grey area. Please keep a tab on this thread at ANI. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, and have a good day. VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 14:13, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that was unquestionably plagiarism and a copyright violation. If I see it happening again, I'll block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
ToBeFree, thanks for your opinion. But why won't you provide adequate explanation to us, the amateurs, why it is unquestionably plagiarism by bringing reasonable arguments to support your claim, instead of threatening with a block? Editors were civilly discussing whether those edits fell into plagiarism or not, so I don't see a reason for making a mountain out of a molehill here. Nonetheless, I have already made my position known in the talk page that I had no objection to removing those edits if competent admins concluded it had violated Wikipedia policies. Accordingly, one may assume that I won't edit war on this one or walk into the same wall after. I would still wait for Diannaa's expertise on this one as she was pinged at ANI. VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 16:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Visioncurve, your argumentation at Talk:Magtymguly_Pyragy#Plagiarism, full of links to the verifiability policy and the guideline against plagiarism, made pretty clear that you're not open to explanations about this. I'd else have provided the advice in {{uw-copyvio}} or {{uw-copyvio-new}}, but you had already passed the point of having received the necessary information. You were arguing against what multiple people had already explained to you, so I decided to make clear where the red line is. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

VC, please remove all of your machine-translated prose from other articles; otherwise, I will have to remove all content cited by you to vernacular sources. Regards, TrangaBellam (talk) 16:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Further, if you are citing a non-English source, please cite the title, journal-name, publisher and other details in the original language alongside (optional) translations. See the couple of Russian sources, I cite at Astana-Baba. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:03, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

edit