Welcome to this talkpage, please be reminded that this page is doing it's weekly cleanup every sunday, 7pm SST, thanks TechvitalCompitar (talk) 00:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, TechvitalCompitar, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sph MediaWorks Channel i, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:55, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Sph MediaWorks Channel i

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Sph MediaWorks Channel i. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – SPH MediaWorks. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at SPH MediaWorks. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:55, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Sph MediaWorks Channel i

edit

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. TechvitalCompitar, thanks for creating Sph MediaWorks Channel i!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The only source provided is a youtube video that cannot be used to verify any of the content in the article. This article needs references to substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources. Please review WP:REFBEGIN

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Criminals (2018 Webdrama)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Criminals (2018 Webdrama) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:50, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Criminals (2018 Webdrama) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Criminals (2018 Webdrama), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 14:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Criminals (2018 Webdrama) (May 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:21, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, TechvitalCompitar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:21, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Criminals (2018 Webdrama) (May 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:32, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Criminals (2018 Webdrama) (May 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Criminals (2018 Webdrama) (May 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Trivia section

edit

Hi, this is 1.02 editor. I noticed that you have recently reverted one of my edits regarding the removal of a trivia section. The trivia section in question is unnotable and contains information and materials irrelevant to the article. Mentioning that the show was the x th collaboration between actors is not notable and constructive, hence my removal of the content. If you have no objections to this, I will remove the section again. Thank you. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 14:02, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Objection

may I know the reason?1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 05:39, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Some of the sites with trivia is appropriate but the unnecessary items was deleted by me so I felt that it should be fine, and it is for Editors to write notes of the serial at the section

Nomination of Criminals (2018 Webdrama) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criminals (2018 Webdrama) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criminals (2018 Webdrama) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KylieTastic (talk) 16:10, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of TechvitalCompitar

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TechvitalCompitar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KylieTastic (talk) 16:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:KylieTastic, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 16:17, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at TechvitalCompitar. KylieTastic (talk) 16:19, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I believed that this page do not violate any content in Wikipedia. --TechvitalCompitar (talk) 16:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 17:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Report of vandalism in User:TechvitalCompitar

edit

Alexf should be reported instead for vandalising my user page as he removed all of the sections and taken down my page: Criminals (2018 Webdrama) without any notice.
Wikipedia, please help me, thanks

hi, just saying, the page Criminals (2018 Webdrama) was deleted for a good reason- for failing WP:GNG and possibly WP:SOAP. Meanwhile, I suspect that your user page was removed for being self promotional (I haven't seen the revision yet). Also please sign your comments with four tides (~~~~). Thanks 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 07:32, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
following a check it appears that it was removed as per Wp:UNOT. Please do read the userpage guidelines before recreating your userpage. Thanks, 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 07:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please do not anyhow assume your imagination... It had gone wild, please revert them back

For the last time please SIGN YOUR COMMENTS ON TALK PAGES. Also, I support the desicions of the person who blanked your userpage, so don't ask me. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 02:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

I would like to talk to the manager (TechvitalCompitar (talk) 12:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Then lets settle it in court TechvitalCompitar (talk) 11:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018

edit

  Your recent edits to User talk:TechvitalCompitar could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 14:23, 3 June 2018 (UTC) Ok fine 202.156.162.132 (talk) 14:26, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fifty & Fabulous moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Fifty & Fabulous, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. The editor whose username is Z0 08:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fifty & Fabulous (June 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Fifty & Fabulous, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 14:09, 6 June 2018 (UTC) But for that article, it is benefiting users that watches the show to edit in the article, not the draft page TechvitalCompitar (talk) 14:12, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fifty & Fabulous (June 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Fifty & Fabulous

edit

  Draft:Fifty & Fabulous, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Fifty & Fabulous and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Fifty & Fabulous during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 16:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fifty & Fabulous (June 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 16:51, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=I believe that I do not make distruptive edits and I did the edits to fix errors made and blank spaces. TechvitalCompitar (talk) 10:57, 19 July 2018 (UTC)~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 06:12, 19 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Blessings 2

edit

Hi! Can you help me with the Draft:Blessings 2 Article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeeChoonYeeLcy (talkcontribs) 03:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply