TalkativeIndividual130

Welcome!

Hello, TalkativeIndividual130! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 14:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Sídlisko II moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sídlisko II, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 14:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Sídlisko III moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sídlisko III, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 14:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sídlisko II (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sídlisko II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sídlisko II, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, TalkativeIndividual130! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sídlisko II (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sídlisko II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sídlisko II, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sídlisko II (May 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Buddhism

Please see MOS:NOTSEEALSO: "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body." Thank you JimRenge (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Overlinking

Please take a read of WP:OVERLINK as it seems to be a trend in most of your edits. Praxidicae (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Also stop linking to the same item multiple times and please stop linking to redirects for the same item in the same sentence. Praxidicae (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

You are continuing to make ridiculous edits that add no value to articles and in fact make them worse, such as this. Stop doing so and start responding on your talk page. Praxidicae (talk) 20:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

You said something completely stupid. I get the part with overlinking, but what "ridiculous" changes did I make on the page you linked? That makes it worse? Like what? HOW? If anything it makes it better, I literally added his label and improved the overall article quality with the source and other information. TalkativeIndividual130 (talk) 20:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

How is removing sources helpful at all? Not to mention the unsourced addition of the label. Praxidicae (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Bruh you're one of the most annoying people in Wikipedia, I bet. How is it better? It's not, but does it make it worse? No. And actually, it might be better. Why the f*ck would you wanna leave a source that doesn't work, what is your f*cking reasoning? At this point, it just seems like you're trying to make me frustrated. As soon as I saw that I got a f*cking message I knew it was gonna be you with some annoying as* sh*t. TalkativeIndividual130 (talk) 16:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

You're going to find yourself blocked if you continue with personal attacks. Kindly stop messing with articles until you've read and understood our MOS and other relevant guidelines. Consider this a final warning. Praxidicae (talk) 16:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

You need to actually read MOS:OVERLINK and stop linking common, everyday words and countries. I am this close to blocking you for disruption. Sro23 (talk) 01:33, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Studio apartment. This is clearly subtle vandalism, stop overlinking stuff and piping links to irrelevant articles. Praxidicae (talk) 13:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

At this point I feel like you're joking. How is linking one country vandalism? What are you even talking about? Bruh.......— Preceding unsigned comment added by TalkativeIndividual130 (talk • contribs)

First, I'm not your bruh, stop referring to me as such. You can call me by my username. Second, explain how the US NAVY is the United States and it's relevance to that article? Praxidicae (talk) 13:47, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I thought I linked to the US. I was editing through Virtual editor and I clicked on the wrong thing, but then I thought I relinked it to the US. Alright, sorry for that, but other than that, I don't feel like that was overlinking or something. I just linked Sweden and the United States. TalkativeIndividual130 (talk) 13:51, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been consistently overlinking everywhere. A useful idea would be to stop linking things at all until you understand how articles are supposed to be formatted and do something more constructive, like typo fixes or sourcing content. Praxidicae (talk) 13:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sídlisko III has been accepted

Sídlisko III, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sídlisko III

Hello, TalkativeIndividual130. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sídlisko III, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)