Sumaya AkterBD

July 2022

Hello Sumaya AkterBD. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sumaya AkterBD. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sumaya AkterBD|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Michelson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel Michelson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.realbiblecodes.com/people/michelson.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 05:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Michelson

The article Daniel Michelson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mccapra (talk) 06:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Actually I am new here, as you see I am new bey.I didn't understand at all about references issue.Prof Daniel Michelson is my mentor I want to make a biography of him.Can you please help me out? Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 06:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

ok sure. First off you need to know that Wikipedia has rules about biography articles. The subject of an academic biography article needs to meet the standard set out in WP:NPROF. then everything in the article needs to be supported by reliable independent sources. This means you can’t just copy a professor’s faculty page onto Wikipedia. You need to search for sources independent of their institution that discuss them or their work, any awards they’ve received etc. it’s quite a lot of work to do.

If you want to continue working on the Michelson article I can move it to draft space outside the main encyclopedia if you agree, and you can work in it there until it’s ready to be published. Mccapra (talk) 07:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Michelson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel Michelson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PICKLEDICAE🥒 09:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sumaya AkterBD

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sumaya AkterBD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Haseeb (talk) 05:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Next Big Blockchain

Hello, Sumaya AkterBD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Next Big Blockchain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Next Big Blockchain

Hello, Sumaya AkterBD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Next Big Blockchain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 02:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sumaya AkterBD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of TotalTruthTeller24. I believe this block is a mistake because I have not engaged in any activity related to the alleged account. I have made significant contributions to Wikipedia, including international contributions, which can be verified here: [1] and [2]. I have always and will continue to adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you. Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 02:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

TotalTurthTeller24 has on multiple occasions used paid editors to recreate their articles/redirects and I believe in all likelihood that this is what occurred here. You state below that you "offer freelance work in translation and content creation"; I believe it is more than a coincidence that you admit this and have also, with only a handful of edits under your belt, requested the restoration of an article created by a prolific sock who hires people to restore their pet articles. The remainder of your edits are obvious paid editing as well. For these reasons I'm declining your appeal. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I admit that I didn't look at your global contributions before blocking you, which does lend some credence to the claim that you're not TotalTruthTeller24. You were editing from proxies, but I doubt that TTT24 can contribute in non-English languages. Can you explain your user page, though, which is an advertisement for paid services? Why did you instantly go to a page created by TotalTruthTeller24 and recreate it? Were you paid or asked to do so? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate: @BD2412:

Hi NinjaRobotPirate, Thank you for considering my appeal. Here are my responses to your questions: User Page Advertising: My user page mentions paid services because I offer freelance work in translation and content creation. While paid editing is allowed, it is only if announced on my user page, so I included this information to comply with transparency guidelines. However, I can remove it if necessary. Editing a Page Created by TotalTruthTeller24: I came across the page while browsing and found it interesting, so I decided to contribute. I was not paid or asked by anyone to recreate it. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Sumaya AkterBD Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 00:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate: @BD2412:

When I filed for undeletion, BD2412 confirmed that nothing in the article's history prohibited work being done by another editor. I was in the middle of adding new content, including a new image and a complete rewrite of the biography section to be more encyclopedic, when I was mistaken for TTT24 and blocked. If there hadn't been a quick assumption, it would have been clear that I was creating a new article, using the previous version as a template for consistency. Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 15:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

I am dubious, but would be willing to assume good faith here. I frankly don't see the case for paid editing in the creation of an article on a fictional character from the Kingsmen franchise. BD2412 T 01:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your willingness to assume good faith. I genuinely enjoy editing Wikipedia and strive to improve its content. Would I need to make another request to undelete the page after this so I can finish writing a new article as well, or would you be restoring that with my account, so I can continue contributing productively to Wikipedia? Thank you for your consideration. Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 13:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

@BD2412: Thank you for your willingness to assume good faith. I genuinely enjoy editing Wikipedia and strive to improve its content. Would I need to make another request to undelete the page after this so I can finish writing a new article as well, or would you be restoring that with my account, so I can continue contributing productively to Wikipedia? Thank you for your consideration. Sumaya AkterBD Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 15:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

To be clear, I am not unblocking you, I am just expressing my opinion here in passing by. You would need to ask the administrator who blocked you. BD2412 T 14:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

@BD2412: NinjaRobotPirate (that administrator) is actively not listening to me and has now muted me. Is there any other admin I can talk to? Or can you do it? ~~~~ Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 02:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

You can post another unblock request on this page seeking an uninvolved opinion. I do not intend to second-guess the blocking admin's judgment in this matter. BD2412 T 02:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

@BD2412 Okay, done. What should I do now? ~~~~ Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 03:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate: Hello, NinjaRobotPirate? What would the timeline be on how many days I would have to wait for you to respond on restoring my account and be given back the ability to resume editing? It’s been over a week since I’ve heard from you and BD2412 said I need to talk to you and only you. ~~~~ Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 01:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

I think you're lying. I don't see how you could have randomly ended up on a page repeatedly created by this sockmaster, recreate the exact same page, and also have a paid editing advertisement on your user page without having been paid by the sockmaster to create the page. So, no, I will not be unblocking you. I am also adding you to my muted list, so I will no longer receive any pings by you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate: I apologize for any misunderstanding. I assure you that I was not paid by anyone to create that page. My intention was solely to contribute to the platform. I understand your decision and respect it. Thank you for your time. Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 02:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Request

Hello I am posting this second unblock request to this page seeking an uninvolved opinion on advice of BD2412. I am neither a sockpuppet of or proxy editor for TotalTruthTeller24. When I filed for undeletion of Agent Galahad with BD2412, she confirmed that nothing in the article's history prohibited work on a new article of that name being done by another editor. Using the previous version of the article for consistency, I was in the middle of adding new content, including a new image and a complete rewrite of the biography section to be more encyclopedic, when I was mistaken for the article's previous editor TotalTruthTeller24 and blocked mid-edit. If there hadn't been such a quick assumption from NRP, it would have been clear that I was creating a new article, only using the previous version as a template to get started on writing it. Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 03:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Only one open request is needed at a time; adding additional requests has no effect. 331dot (talk) 21:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

I wanted to inform you that NRP is explicitly refusing to close the original review. Your assistance in resolving this matter would be greatly appreciated. Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 14:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)