Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

(tJosve05a (c) 21:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Shyamw1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (tJosve05a (c) 21:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BenLinus1214 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. BenLinus1214talk 20:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 19:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: User:Shyamw1/sandbox has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Shyamw1/sandbox. Thanks! Rankersbo (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar (December 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar (December 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question edit

  Hello, Shyamw1! I'm Wikiisawesome. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wia🎄/tlk 17:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Shyamw1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Liz Read! Talk! 15:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Shyamw1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 6 May 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

AfC notification: User:Shyamw1/sandbox has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Shyamw1/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Shyamw1 (talk) 14:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Dear Robert,

You mentioned that there is already an article on Gopalapuram Parthasasrathy in Wikipedia. I have written about Gopalaswami Parthasarathy, not Gopalapuram Parthasarathy. They are 2 different people, both were foreign policy experts. Gopalapuram Parthasarathy is still alive whereas the one I wrote about, Gopalaswami Parthasarathy, is deceased. If you have read both the articles you will realize that these are 2 different people.

I also read another comment about not having enough sources in my article - I don't remember which reviewer mentioned this. During my research I could only find 2 New York Times artilces on G.P and a book published during his birth centenary. These are both reliable, published sources and contain the necessary information.

Please look at both articles on G. Parthasarathy (the one that already exists in Wikipedia about a different person) and the one I submitted. I don't know how else to convince you that these are not the same person.

Shyamw1Shyamw1 (talk) 14:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
There are currently three pages about people with the same or similar names. There is an article in article space about Gopalapuram Parthasarathy or Gopalaswami Parthasarathy, who is a living person and appears to be a retired Indian diplomat. There is a draft Draft: G. Parthasarathy in draft space, about an earlier Indian diplomat, 1912-1995. You have also submitted a sandbox draft, User:Shyamw1/sandbox about an Indian diplomat who was born in 1912 and died in 1995. As far as I can tell, Draft: G. Parthasarathy and User:Shyamw1/sandbox are almost the same. They contain much of the same language and appear to be mostly the work of the same author. They are almost certainly biographies of the same person. Please compare the two drafts. Updates should be made to Draft: G. Parthasarathy. Are you User:Wshyam? If so, and you want the version in draft space deleted, you may request its deletion, but, if so, please explain why you are using two accounts with similar names. If you and User:Wshyam are really two different users, please coordinate your edits. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Shyamw1/sandbox. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please try addressing my questions about the two drafts and the one or two authors, rather than just resubmitting. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello Robert,

I didn't intend to make uncosntructive edits and I am sorry if that's what happened. Can you please provide specific examples of the "unconstructive" so I understand what you mean? I was merely trying to add more reliable sources to my article since your earlier comment said I needed more sources. Also, I would like to know how to delete the first draft I submitted so I am not wasting a reviewer's time? I would like my second submission (the one with more sources) to be reviewed instead. Thanks. Shyamw1 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply

I am deleting the warning because I realize that I may have been harsh. We are both confused, and I am asking for advice at the Teahouse. ~~

Thank you - I look forward to the advice. Any help I can get to improve the article and have it accepted will be greatly appreciated. Shyamw1 (talk) 20:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply

Robert, I read Wikipedia's reference for beginners section several times over the last couple of days and I redid all the references as best I could. Could you please review and let me know if anything still needs correction? Thanks so much. Shyamw1 (talk) 14:04, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply


AfC notification: Draft:Gopalaswami Parthasarathy has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gopalaswami Parthasarathy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Gopalaswami Parthasarathy has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gopalaswami Parthasarathy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Redirect edit

Don't worry about that phrase. Your draft has been moved to draft space and is still being considered. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Shyamw1 (talk) 12:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply

Just wondering about the status of my submission on G. Parthasarathy. Thanks. Shyamw1 (talk) 14:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply


Dear Robert,

I am wondering about the status of my draft article on G. Parthasarathy. I haven't heard anything since my last submission at the end of June. Please advise. Thanks. Shyamw1 (talk) 18:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question edit

  Hello, Shyamw1! I'm Wiae. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wiae /tlk 13:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


Dear Wiae, I submitted the draft after editing the language by following your instructions. However, I'm not sure I did it right. Is there any way to know if I submitted it correctly or not? Thanks in advance for your help.Shyamw1 (talk) 14:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gopalaswami Parthasarathy (diplomat) has been accepted edit

 
Gopalaswami Parthasarathy (diplomat), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 21:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


Thank you so much. I wish to thank all the editors who have patiently guided me through this long process and helped me better understand how Wikipedia works. Shyamw1 (talk) 13:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply


Dear SisterTwister, I tried searching for this article on Wikipedia but couldn't find it. Does it take a while for it to show up on Wikipedia? If yes, when can I expect to see it there? Thanks, again. Shyamw1 (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply

Dear Sister Twister,

When I search Wikipedia for the article I submitted on G. Parthasarathy, I only see the article on the other diplomat who is also known as G. Parthasarathy. I do not see the one I wrote about on the search results list. Just wondering how to make that appear when someone does a search. It is rare that two people with the same name also share the same career and that maybe the problem here. Look forward to your response. Thank you. Shyamw1 (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply


It's there - thank you! Shyamw1 (talk) 16:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1Reply