Sasper

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Sasper! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- LittleOldMe 12:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

B'nei Noah

I will be working on the B'nei Noah article soon. Keep watch. Chavatshimshon 06:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

"Elfdalian"

The move from Älvdalsmål to Elfdalian was made without a discussion. Whoever made the move should explain it on Talk:Elfdalian. I would really recommend that you don't lend your account to other people in the future. At least not if they're not going to support or properly explain their edits. Peter ^Isotalo 11:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your personal advice. You are stating the obvious. However, I don't see I can do anything else now than reserving myself from edits made in my name. Reverting those contributions is not an option as I see it, since, after all, they added extensive information to the article. I don't want to enter into a discussion about the move of the article but I suggest you pose your critique on Talk:Elfdalian. --Sasper 16:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

You should encourage your friend to reveal his identity, then. Otherwise it might easily seem as some kind of unwholesome attempt at sock puppetry.

Peter ^Isotalo 19:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

I am not really sure what the very exact definition of sock puppetry is, but if you mean I could have written the article myself, but I don't want to admit it, I can only repeat what I have stated, that it is not the case. I don't have the specific knowledge about Elfdalian/Älvdalsmål that would make me able to write such an article. I don't really see either what motive I could have for writing something and then denying it. I neither distance myself from what he has written, nor do I endorse it, I just say I am not responsible. You may regard the contributions as coming from an unsigned user.--Sasper 20:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

May it be XXX himself whom you are an "agent" for, Sasper?

Jens Persson (213.67.64.22 14:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

I am not an agent for anybody; as I have stated, I haven't written the contributions of 31 December 2006 and 1 January 2007. --Sasper 05:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Iceland

Maybe you are interested in this project... --Michkalas 15:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

New Alliance

Hej Casper
Jeg har fjernet din edit fra Ny alliance siden, som du sikkert har fundet ud af, så er det en "and" i Politikken.
Mads Angelbo ^{Talk / Contribs} 07:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, the story about Eyvind Vesselbo's party switch turned out to be untrue, but the circumstances are still interesting so I added an update to the New Alliance article. --Sasper 18:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Danish regions

Hi Casper

I've taken the liberty of undoing your two page moves regarding the two Jutlandic regions. The "of"-construction just sounds a bit strange to me in this context, compared to the similar material for other countries (I am aware that Nordjyllands Amt used that construction on its English webpage, but still). It might be more English to swap the two parts of the name, e.g. X Region rather than Region X but I'm not completely sure. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find any English renderings of the names of the new regions. Have you had any such luck? Valentinian ^{T / C} 11:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

As a non-native English speaker, I can't claim the last say on this. But I still think "Region North Jutland" and "Region South Jutland" sound odd without the "of". Currently only two regions seem to have an english version of their official website, and they call themselves Region Sealand and The Capital Region of Denmark respectively. "Capital Region" is a common compound in English, formed by an an adjective + a noun, so that seems OK. I wouldn't rely on just what the regions happen to call themselves in English because that might not be the correct usage nor an official title. But I'll look out for how official state bodies translate the names. It is complicated by the fact that the Danish names are actually not compliant with good language or traditional name custom. Constructions like Area North, Sector 3, Centre East, Region Sealand used to be used only in army and business management language, and much less so than in German and English. Then they slid into the language of bureaucrats, but it is the first time they have been turned into official names of public bodies. --Sasper 17:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree, the Danish names are horrible as well. Btw, it is "Southern Denmark", rather than "South Jutland". I guess "Capital Region (Denmark)" could work. I'm surprised by the other translation, though, as Zealand is normally written with a "Z". I'll keep looking as well. Tobias Conradi suggested switching the word order to e.g. "Sjælland Region" or "Zealand Region". Valentinian ^{T / C} 18:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Btw, nice work on your article on the Gedser-Rostock bridge. Have you seen that a bridge between Bøjden and Fynshav was recently suggested as a rival to an Århus-Samsø-Kalundborg third Little Belt bridge? Valentinian ^{T / C} 15:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Yes, a dizzying lot of bridges have been proposed during the last months. Now there are not so many motorways left to suggest any more. --Sasper 17:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC

Thisted, Holstebro, Viborg, Tønder, Næstved, and Kalundborg probably disagree. :) Anyway, it will still take ages to fix the rail network and to expand all the those motorways that were originally planned as with three lanes either way but only built with two. Valentinian ^{T / C} 18:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Gedser-Rostock bridge

Hi Casper

I don't completely understand the sentence that it would be the first bridge spanning an unnamed waterway. Aren't these waters named "Kadetrenden" in Danish or is my memory just faulty :) ? Happy editing. Valentinian ^{T / C} 07:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

As far as I know, Kadetrenden is not the name of the strait between Falster and Germany, but rather the name of the east-west fairway in the middle of that strait where waters are deep enough for ships to sail. Similar to Øresund, which has Flinterenden, Drogden (and maybe even more fairways). Also, marine names such as Kadetrenden are not really used by the wider public. --Sasper 20:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, sounds sensible. But isn't the entire area simply part of the Bay of Mecklenburg? Valentinian ^{T / C} 19:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Many bodies of water lack an clear, traditional definition. I would assume the Bay of Mecklenburg only covers the German side, not the Danish one. Also, the core of the Bay of Mecklenburg is a bit further west. The fact that the Danish media presented the proposal as a "bridge from Gedser to Rostock" already hints that there is no evident name for that body of water. --Sasper 23:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Dunst (queer network in Copenhagen)

I'm really curious as to your reason for moving "Dunst (television)" to "Dunst (queer network in Copenhagen)". Have you read how the naming conventions work? Specifically, I think Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)#Qualifier between bracketing parentheses fits for this article. Even more specifically, I believe your parenthetical for the title of the article is waaaay overboard. Thoughts? -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 02:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

See Talk:Dunst (queer network in Copenhagen). --Sasper (talk) 14:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

ROTFL! Is that how the faerie article comes across!?!? I'm going to have to address that - laughter, chaos and sarcasm are rampant in the Faerie community :) [http:www.radfae.org radfae.org] is another place to check out - or eurofaerie.eu. Thanks for your help on the Dunst article :) -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 19:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Øresund

Relating to your post to Talk:Øresund regarding the name of the article (that Oresund is not a correct or popular spelling), I have moved the article from Oresund to Øresund. I took "Øresund" to be more appropriate than the Swedish spelling "Öresund" because there seems to be greater precedent for the Danish spelling and because Øresund is in the Danish Straits. If you have any comments, either contact me on my talk page, or post to Talk:Øresund. Thanks, Oldak Quill 14:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

The Alcat Test

Hey! Good job on the The Alcat Test article! You mentioned some points of view that I did not cover at all. I typed out the article as I watched the programme, so I kept the memory of the subject as clear as possible, yet I managed to forget some very important aspects. Thanks for clearing it up! Bobber0001 (talk) 06:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Paul Belien

Hi, Just a note to apologize about my interfering with your editing on Paul Beliën. I read the article, noticed the OR and decided to remove it. It's only after I did the edit that I noticed you were actively editing at the same moment. (I do stand by my decision to remove the paragraphs though.) --Luxem (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Saxo Bank

[Moved to Talk:Saxo_Bank#Saxo_Bank]

re

Hey Sasper. I think it might be best to get other editors involved with this issue, probably the best thing to do is get a Wikipedia:Third Opinion (or WP:RFC if necessary) and just settle it for good. Ostap 01:26, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Team Europe

Hi Casper, I removed your disambiguation link on 'Team Europe' as the organisation you linked is TEAM not TEAM Europe. The denomination 'Team Europe' is neither on the page you linked, nor on the main webpage of the organisation. It is only present in the internet address of the organisation. If you really think that there is a need for a disambiguation, I suggest that you create a specific page instead of inserting this link on the top of the page. CheersGpeilon (talk) 23:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Sasper. You have new messages at Difu Wu's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Slimane Hadj Abderrahmane

Good point. I was not following carefully and was under the impression that the article discussed charges he was facing in the US. Thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:20, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

No problem. I also needed to read the article carefully to be sure about that detail. --Sasper (talk) 21:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Vorupør

Hej Sasper, tak for de nye artikel, men skal den ikke flyttes til "Nørre Vorupør" som på da, de og nl.wiki? De728631 (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

No, on the contrary, I think the other ones should be moved to "Vorupør". The village is locally always known as Vorupør. You only specify Nørre or Sønder when you specifically talk about the northern or southern part. The parish is Vorupør Sogn, and the church is Vorupør Kirke. The history and institutions of the village are all connected with Vorupør as a whole, not "Nørrre Vorupør". But non-locals usually don't know that. The usage of "Nørre Vorupør" can be said to be hypercorrect, unless you specifically wish to exclude the southern village. --Sasper (talk) 15:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Ah, alright. Let's leave it at Vorupør then. De728631 (talk) 15:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Church of Denmark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parish council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Limfjord (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Salty, Thy, Skive and Struer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Kinnock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Advisor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vollsmose may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Limfjord, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hals and Thing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited T–V distinction, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SAS, Rostrum and Prince Joachim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited T–V distinction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royalty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rigshospitalet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Kingdom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2007 Andreanof Islands earthquake

The article 2007 Andreanof Islands earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No damage, injuries, or deaths. This appears to have been a non-event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dawnseeker2000 23:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sasper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sasper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sasper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erik Aalbæk Jensen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Jutland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amagerbanen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Sound and Prøvestenen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Preben Bang Henriksen

Hello, Sasper,

Thank you for creating Preben Bang Henriksen.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 15:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gemeinsamer Ausschuss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Greens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mastoid cells, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohrenstraße, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Peter Skautrup Centret moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Peter Skautrup Centret, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello Mccapra. It is difficult to find media articles about such a topic, especially in English – since the topic is a narrow, academic one. That does not make it less notable, though. I would regard that a research institute at a university can be assumed to be objective enough to be used as a reliable source for their own activities, since they fulfil academic standards (maybe contrarily to the general rule that an organisation, company or individual cannot be expected to be objective about themselves). I don't agree that the article is not suitable for publishing as it stands, although it can of course be improved. Additional sources will likely be in Danish. --Sasper (talk) 13:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, have you considered, instead creating a separate article, to make a section in Jutlandic on the research/resources about the language? A section instead of an article would make sense if it's not gonna be longer than a stub anyways, situate its relevance, and such sections already exist in various articles. Then one could make a redirect to the section. Replayful (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

A research institute should have its own article. --Sasper (talk) 14:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

That's a valid opinion, but also a question of editorial policy that I will not gain anything by discussing. Even with an independent article it makes sense for a research center to have a section on its subject's page (with a link to the "main article"). It was just an idea in case you wanted to make your text immediately useful, as I think it can basically be copied to Jutlandic for that purpose. Replayful (talk) 15:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Skautrup Centret

Hello, Sasper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Skautrup Centret, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Skautrup Centret

Hello, Sasper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter Skautrup Centret".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greenland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Jutland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)